Analysis of Major Characters
Henry Drummond
The infamous criminal-defense attorney Henry Drummond
arrives in Hillsboro vilified as an atheist but leaves, after losing
the trial, as a hero. To the audienceand to many of the townspeopleDrummond
makes a convincing case for the right of a human being to think.
He accomplishes this feat by exposing the contradictions underlying
his witnesses' inherited religious beliefs. During the case, Drummond
demonstrates that people know less than what they believe themselves
to know. His greatest triumph in the name of free thought is getting
Howard Blair to admit that he has not made up his mind about evolutionary
theory. When we hear this admission, Drummond's point becomes clear:
freedom of thought becomes the freedom to be wrong or to change
our minds. The world, viewed in this light, is full of possibilities.
Although Drummond typically exposes the shortcomings of
his subjects' beliefs in gentle fashion, his cross-examination of
Matthew Harrison Brady causes humiliation and hysteria. Brady self-destructs
when his convictions about the literal truth of the Bible wither
under the light of Drummond's skepticism. Until that point, Drummond
deploys his wry withis purple suspenders from Nebraska, his cracks
about the unfairness of Brady's title and the judge's announcement
of a Bible meeting but no evolutionist meetingto no one's harm,
while ironically exposing the injustice that his defendant faces.
While Drummond's attack of Brady is not mean-spirited, it is devastating.
At the same time, the power of Drummond's attack stems not so much
from Drummond's wit as from the weight of Brady's egotism, stubbornness,
and arrogance as they collapse in his ranting testimony.
Unlike Brady, Drummond does not conceive of truth as a
set of fixed rules that can be read from a book and imposed on society.
His wonder about the world, which he shares and encourages in Cates, allows
him to look behind the paint, to interpret events for more than
their obvious meanings. Drummond's thorough examination of his witnesses'
beliefs exposes complexities and contradictions in the same way
that Cates's microscopes reveal to his students complexities of
life and matter not visible to the naked eye.
Matthew Harrison Brady
At the beginning of Inherit the Wind,
Brady arrives pompously, confident that the trial is as good as
won. Scornful of the threat that Drummond might present to him as
the opposing attorney, Brady exhibits hubris, or excessive pride,
in failing to consider the prospect of his own humiliation. Playing
on his home turf in rural Christian Tennessee, Brady basks in the
glow of his simple-minded supporters' praise. When Drummond undermines
Brady's authority, Brady breaks down, for he lacks the inner strength
to reconsider his own beliefs and adjust to an unexpected challenge.
We learn that Brady ran for president in three consecutive
elections but never succeeded. This failure plagues him throughout
his life and manifests itself during the trial. When Brady falls
ill following his floundering responses to Drummond's line of questioning,
he deliriously spews forth the speech he had prepared for a possible presidential
victory. Brady is a caricature of the real-life prosecutor William
Jennings Bryan. Like Brady, Bryan lost three presidential elections
and died shortly after the Scopes Monkey Trial. In Inherit the
Wind, as in the national media in 1925,
Brady's / Bryan's death symbolized the humiliation he suffered in
the trial and the end of an obsolete brand of politics. Bryan was
a Democrat, but in the decades after his death, his party took on
a more progressive, liberal stance. Not that conservative elements
disappeared from American politicsthey now exist as tenets of the
Republican party.
Although his politics and values are rigidly fundamentalist, Brady
remains a complex character. Although he subscribes to a rather
traditional brand of Christianity, he embraces more of the Bible
than the Hillsboro preacher Reverend Brown does. When Brown harshly
calls for eternal hellfire as punishment for Cates and all those
who side with himincluding even his own daughterBrady interrupts
Brown and reminds the crowd of the Christian doctrine of forgiveness.
Brown's version of Christianity, with its frequent casting out of
sinners, is grounded in the harsher books of the Old Testament.
Brady's, on the other hand, recognizes the more compassionate elements
of Jesus' message and the possibilities that this compassion creates
for mankind.
Bertram Cates
As his jailer, Mr. Meeker, points out, Bertram Cates is
not a criminal type. A quiet, unassuming twenty-four-year-old, Cates
is innocent, naïve, and wondrous about the worldand he suffers
emotionally as a result of the townspeople's treatment of him. He
struggles to stand up as an individual even as the crowd opposes
his views and actions. Although he remains idealistic throughout Inherit
the Wind, he often needs Drummond's encouragement to persevere with
his cause. Cates doubts himself at times, especially when Rachel
pleads him to admit his guilt and beg forgiveness.
In several instances in the play, Cates displays
the humanity of an open, forgiving mind, as do the other evolutionists
and progressives. Ironically, forgiveness comes more readily to
Cates than to his staunchly Christian neighborsforemost among them
Reverend Brown, whose fire-and-brimstone sermons led Cates to abandon
the church. Although Rachel unwittingly and unwillingly betrays
Cates by testifying against him at Brady's behest, he sympathizes
with her pain as she becomes distraught during her time on the witness
stand. In fact, Cates urges the court to dismiss Rachel from the
stand, which denies her the chance to defend Cates when questioned
by Drummond. In the end, when Cates leaves town with Rachel, we
see that his trial has opened Rachel's mind as well.
Rachel Brown
Rachel's romance with Cates runs parallel to
her own personal development and highlights the primary conflict
in the playfundamentalism versus freedom of thought. Rachel's budding emotions
pull her away from her father, Reverend Brown, the religious leader
of Hillsboro. As Rachel tells more of her story, her father and
the form of Christianity practiced in Hillsboro appear more and
more cruel and heartless. Rachel relates that her father always
frightened her, even from a young age. He publicly confirms her
fears at a town prayer meeting, when he damns her soul for supporting
Cates. As Rachel's romantic interest, Cates, who teaches evolution
to his students and brings an open mind to matters of science and
religion, stands in bold opposition to Rachel's father and his views.
Perhaps most important, Cates refrains from imposing his own views
on others and is willing to engage in constant questioning of ideas.
Throughout Inherit the Wind, these two charactersCates
and Reverend Browntest Rachel's loyalties. At the conclusion of
the trial, Rachel separates from her father and departs with Catesa
choice that enables her personal liberation.