Skip over navigation

Apocalypse Now

Analysis of Major Characters

Character List

Themes, Motifs, and Symbols

Captain Willard

Army Captain Willard is a largely passive character. In fact, Martin Sheen replaced Harvey Keitel in the role after Coppola decided Keitel seemed like too active a screen presence. Sheen brings a more muted presence to the film than the forceful Keitel and, as a result, is more compelling as the audience’s guide into Vietnam. Willard’s primary action is to kill Kurtz. He spends the rest of the film watching intently and internalizing what goes on in the jungle. In his narration, Willard points out the disturbing ironies of war and attempts to insert a faint notion of morality. As he becomes more alert to the absurdities of war and the darkness of human nature, so do we. Nevertheless, we relate to him slowly, despite his role as the film's protagonist, due to his equivocal and impersonal nature. Willard frequently stares off at a point above our shoulder. The war has shell-shocked him, and the film similarly shell-shocks us.

The first shot of Willard inverts his face and superimposes it over the left side of the screen. His eyes are wide open and disturbingly blank. The subsequent scene introduces him as a man who has reached his breaking point. He is in the midst of a nervous breakdown, a state of dementia induced by alcohol and a sense of alienation from the civilized world. When the scene was shot, Sheen actually was drunk and insisted the cameras keep rolling, even after he bloodied his first by accidentally punching the mirror. Thus, from the opening scene Sheen portrays Willard as a man changed irreversibly by war. He managed to leave it physically but could not free his mind. Now he is back, abandoning all ideas of home, resigned to and eager for a return to combat.

Willard’s behavior is at times infuriatingly passive. He takes the mission—“what the hell else was I gonna do?”—and stays out of events that do not affect that mission directly. He interacts with the PBR crew only minimally. He finds Kilgore and goes along with Kilgore’s mass mayhem. He observes the Playmates’ show with amusement, barely participating. Most of Willard’s time on the river is spent reviewing Kurtz’s dossier, understanding and relating to his target more and more. The only action he takes prior to killing Kurtz is his murder of the Vietnamese peasant on the sampan—yet he only takes this action in order to preserve his mission’s priority. Even Willard’s slaughter of Kurtz is arguably passive: not only is Willard following his orders without judgment, he also is doing exactly what Kurtz wants him to do. While it might be argued that Kurtz’s murder is the only action Willard ever takes in Apocalypse Now, an argument also could be made that his only real, self-made decision is to leave Kurtz’s compound and retreat from the darkness it breeds.

Allegorically, Willard’s journey to Kurtz is a metaphor for a journey into the darkness of the soul. His mission is to find and kill Kurtz: ultimately he fulfills his mission, but along the way there is some question as to whether he will kill Kurtz or join him. As Willard increasingly aligns himself with Kurtz, he begins more fully to understand the reasons behind Kurtz’s insanity. This understanding is fueled by his own descent into near madness. But Willard is able, in the end, to retreat from his descent’s endpoint. Does he return to civilization? The film gives no answer. However, it does imply that Willard at least has given himself the opportunity to reenter the civilized world and its framework of morality—and it leaves the choice to do so up to him.

Colonel Kurtz

Green Beret Colonel Walter E. Kurtz is the archetypal evil genius. Whereas Joseph Conrad’s Kurtz in Heart of Darkness was gaunt, his flesh consumed by the jungle, Marlon Brando’s weight gain before the shooting of Apocalypse Now prevented a similar portrayal in Coppola’s film. Rather than portray Kurtz as indulgent, Brando played him as a larger-than-life character with ominous omniscience. He understands war on the deepest of levels—he sees clearly its horror and has implicated himself with helpless resignation. Indeed, he has turned his back on morality and chosen horror as his lifestyle. Whether Kurtz is insane is up to the viewer. The hanging corpses and severed heads flung around his compound attest to madness, but one could argue that Kurtz’s methods are perfectly sound in the context of a war that is itself insane. Indoctrinated into the methods of the U.S. armed forces, Kurtz did everything right until he got in trouble for killing some Vietnamese intelligence agents. His career was ruined. Bitter at what he considered hypocrisy within the military, Kurtz chose the path of subversion and created his own colony and army, where he now plays God and makes decisions outside the subjective stain of morality.

As Kurtz is Willard’s endpoint, so Willard is Kurtz’s. Kurtz sees Willard as a receptacle for the philosophy that he has lived out in Cambodia. Kurtz wants to die but must first impart his knowledge to Willard so that the assassin will be able to denounce the war after he completes his mission. Kurtz sees no hope in the world, only the darkness that he himself has fostered. He speaks in lofty, grandiose statements about “the horror” of war, yet he is fully, willingly complicit in these horrors. He has given himself full reign, freeing himself from all moral judgments—after all, what place does morality have in war? Thus, Kurtz has become a dark, godlike figure. No one holds him accountable for his actions, not even himself. Brando’s baldness gives his character a monklike, spiritual physicality that emphasizes his godly posturing. While Kurtz accepts and indulges the darkness within the soul, this darkness is what eventually breaks him down. His last words, “The horror, the horror,” suggest that he is seeing clearly for the first time and that he has greeted death so willingly because only death can liberate him from his hopelessness.

Coppola cloaks Kurtz in shadows for all of his scenes. His face is shown in full light only twice, and fleetingly both times: as he calls Willard an “errand boy,” and as he throws Chef’s head into Willard’s lap. (Brando’s face is camouflaged in the second scene.) This shadowy portrayal adds to the surreal quality of the film and the character. The poetry of T. S. Eliot, specifically “The Hollow Men” and “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” figures in Kurtz’s dialogue, as well as in the photojournalist’s blathering. All of this combines to create a character that is out-of-bounds mentally, spiritually, and physically. Despite his grandiose physicality and manner of speaking, Colonel Kurtz’s humanity has withered away. He has faced, and egged on, his demons, and they have won. He can go now, and Willard is his way out.

More Help

Previous Next

Readers' Notes allow users to add their own analysis and insights to our SparkNotes—and to discuss those ideas with one another. Have a novel take or think we left something out? Add a Readers' Note!

Follow Us