|
|
◄
PREVIOUS
Increasing Tensions and The Whiskey Rebellion
|
NEXT
► Division into Parties and George Washington's Farewell Address
|
Building the State (1781-1797)
Expansion and Conflict
Summary
On June 1, 1792, the State of Kentucky was admitted to the Union, and four years
later, on the same day, Tennessee also joined. During the 1790s, the US
attempted to expand its territory into the west (which constituted the land just
west of the Appalachian Mountains), where opposition lay in the foreign powers
of Spain and Britain, both of which desired control of parts of North America.
Also, Native Americans populated most of this coveted land. Each of the three
nations, as well as the Natives, struggled against the others for control of the
western territory.
The US tried to strike a balance between trying to form an alliance with the
Indians and attempting to forcibly remove them. The US tried to force peace
through military action in 1790 and 1791. These military efforts yielded little
success, and the campaign ended with the November 4, 1791 defeat of the US
troops, when the Miami Indians killed 900 men out of a force of 1400. Having
failed militarily, President Washington authorized Secretary of War
Henry Knox to proclaim that the Indian title to land would be formally
recognized by the US and would not be revoked without "free consent." Laws
punishing trespassers on Indian land accompanied this policy, as did the
beginning of an initiative to "civilize the natives. However, as in the past,
Indians resisted this initiative and clung to their cultures. The attempt to
alter relations with the Indians ended in continued stalemate.
Meanwhile, the French went to war with Britain and Spain in 1793. Northern
merchants pressed for an anti-French foreign policy, and southern planters
encouraged the government to ally itself with France. The nation was torn
between two options. French diplomat Edmond Genet traveled to the United States
to argue the French case to the US government, but he was unsuccessful in
evoking government action. On April 22, 1793, Washington issued the
Proclamation of American Neutrality, refusing to be drawn into the war.
Despite this proclamation, Genet was able to persuade southwestern settlers to
offer limited military support to the French against the Spanish in Florida and
the Mississippi Valley. Additionally, Genet enlisted nearly 1,000 Americans to
function as privateers at sea, terrorizing the British navy.
Washington exhorted his people to cease their attacks on British vessels, but it
was too late. British ministers decided that only a massive show of force would
rectify the situation. Accordingly, the British navy seized over 250 American
vessels during the winter of 1794. At the same time, British naval officers
began the practice of inspecting American vessels for British subjects, who, if
they were found, were impressed into service in the royal navy. American
sailors were often seized as well. Britain further challenged US neutrality in
February 1794. Canada's royal governor denied US claims to the land north of
the Ohio River and encouraged the Indians there to resist expansion. British
troops built Fort Miami on US territory, and the Spanish, following suit, built
Fort San Fernando on US lands in the southwest.
On the brink of war, Washington dispatched negotiators to attempt to win peace
with the encroaching forces. The first to experience success was General
Anthony Wayne, who led troops into the Northwest Territory and routed a large
contingent of Indian warriors at the Battle of Fallen Timbers on August 20,
1794. The next August, twelve Indian tribes signed the Treaty of Greenville,
which ended hostilities and opened the area now known as Ohio to settlement.
Shortly after, Jay's Treaty was signed in Britain. John Jay negotiated
a settlement which removed British troops from American land and reopened trade
with the West Indies. Finally, Thomas Pinckney negotiated the Treaty of San
Lorenzo with Spain, which granted the US unrestricted access to the Mississippi
River and removed Spanish troops from American land.
Commentary
US relations with the Native Americans had grown increasingly dire by the early
1790s. Washington's military efforts in the north proved to be a complete
failure, the southern tribes had resumed hostilities with the inhabitants of the
frontier, and the Indians were unresponsive to attempts at "civilization."
Convinced that the only way to avoid the continued exile from their land at the
hands of the US government, Indian tribes allied themselves with America's
enemies. US citizens, especially those along the frontier, saw the coalitions
being built between the natives and the foreign armies. Many believed that the
only way to contest the forces of Britain and Spain, both supported by Natives,
was through an alliance with France. Many southern and western inhabitants
pressed for pro-French foreign policy, hoping that France, supported by the US,
could achieve victory in Europe, distracting the British and Spanish governments
from their preoccupation with the American West.
American feelings toward France were generally strong, in one direction or the
other. The conservative North generally disapproved of the recent French
Revolution, while more liberal southerners
generally supported it. Northern merchants realized that trade with Britain
was, more than anything else, the force sustaining their economy. The largest
portion of US trade went through British ports. New England businessmen thought
an alliance with France might force British retaliation in the form of
constriction of trade and/or all out war, while a pro-British stance might
invite an expansion of trade. Southerners, on the other hand, saw reliance on
British trade as a weakness of the national economy, and favored the expansion
of trade with France. Additionally, southern plantation owners feared the
intentions of the British toward the institution of slavery. Many based their
opinions on this subject on rumors that claimed the British had begun a bloody
slave uprising on the French-controlled island of Saint Domingue. They feared
the British would attempt to abolish slavery in the American South, and thus
advocated a pro-French foreign policy. The conflict over foreign policy in the
early to mid 1790s was yet another struggle emblematic of the division of the
nation into quarreling factions, largely based on the division between North and
South.
Jay's Treaty, perhaps the most important diplomatic achievement of the
Washington administration, was received poorly in the US, where critics saw it
as a weak attempt at negotiation, allowing the British to continue to impress
sailors and to restrict US trade with French ports in the Caribbean. Jay
himself was criticized heavily by the public and denounced as a diplomatic
failure. However, in retrospect, the treaty accomplished quite a lot,
considering the circumstances. Most importantly, it halted the advance toward
war with Britain before the outbreak of serious violence. Second, it ended the
occupation of American land by British forts, which had lasted for twelve years.
Finally, the treaty made crucial headway in resolving squabbles between the two
nations revolving around the collection of prewar debts, which had gone on for
over a decade.
In retrospect, the Washington administration accomplished a great deal in the
realm of diplomacy. It defended American territorial rights, avoided war, and
opened the crucial port of New Orleans. Though the administration had made
great strides in the establishment of the US as an international power, internal
divisions over policy showed that foreign policy was simply yet another area
that gave rise to political conflict between American citizens.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
◄
PREVIOUS
Increasing Tensions and The Whiskey Rebellion
|
NEXT
► Division into Parties and George Washington's Farewell Address
|
|
|