Like Italy, Germany had quite a few serious issues to resolve once unification
took place. Regional differences, developing since the first settlement of the
Germanic tribes during the Roman Empire, were distinct, and local princes
refused to give up substantial power to the central government. The Berlin
assembly, therefore, was kept weak. Germany, like the United States under the
Articles of the Confederation, seemed merely a
loose of confederation of autonomous states. In Germany's case, one state,
Prussia, was absolutely dominant due to its size, power, and military strength.
This, combined with Bismarck's skillful conduct in international and national
affairs as chancellor, kept the empire together until 1914.
However, the creation of a unified Germany in central Europe marked one of the
greatest revolutions in the history of international relations. Since the
establishment of nation-states in Europe, France, under the Valois-Bourbon royal
line, dedicated its foreign policy to the weakening of Habsburg (Austrian and
Spanish royal families) and the continued disunity of the Germanic provinces.
Now that central Europe was united into two major powers--Germany and
Italy--Europe was quite a different place. What would now become of the
traditional balance of power in place since the defeat of Napoleon? The whole
point had been that no one nation should gain excessive power and strength on
the Continent. With the unification of Germany in central Europe--an essential
economic and strategic region--was the balance of power doomed?