Analysis of Major Characters
Robert Jordan
The protagonist of For Whom the Bell Tolls,
Robert Jordan left his job as a college instructor in the United
States to volunteer for the Republican side in the Spanish Civil
War. Initially, he believed in the Republican cause with a near-religious
faith and felt an absolute brotherhood with his comrades on the
Republican side. However, when the action of the novel starts, we
see that Robert Jordan has become disillusioned. As the conflict
drags on, he realizes that he does not really believe in the Republican
cause but joined their side simply because they fought against Fascism.
Because he fights for a side whose causes he does not necessarily
support, Robert Jordan experiences a great deal of internal conflict
and begins to wonder whether there is really any difference between
the Fascist and Republican sides.
Robert Jordan's interior monologues and actions indicate
these internal conflicts that plague him. Although he is disillusioned
with the Republican cause, he continues to fight for that cause.
In public he announces that he is anti-Fascist rather than a Communist,
but in private he thinks that he has no politics at all. He knows
that his job requires that he kill people but also knows that he
should not believe in killing in the abstract. Despite his newfound
love for Maria, he feels that there cannot be a place for her in
his life while he also has his military work. He claims not to be
superstitious but cannot stop thinking about the world as giving
him signs of things to come. These conflicts weigh heavily on Robert
Jordan throughout the bulk of the novel.
Robert Jordan resolves these tensions at the end of For
Whom the Bell Tolls, in his final moments as he faces death.
He accepts himself as a man of action rather than thought, as a
man who believes in practicality rather than abstract theories.
He understands that the war requires him to do some things that
he does not believe in. He also realizes that, though he cannot
forget the unsavory deeds he has done in the past, he must avoid
dwelling on them for the sake of getting things done in the present. Ultimately,
Robert Jordan is able to make room in his mind for both his love
for Maria and his military mission. By the end of the novel, just
before he dies, his internal conflicts and tensions are resolved
and he feels integrated into the world.
Pablo
Pablo, the exasperating leader of the guerrilla band,
is a complex character and an unpredictable force in the novela
man who is difficult to like but ultimately difficult to condemn
unwaveringly. Pablo and Robert Jordan view each other with mutual
suspicion and dislike from the start: Pablo adamantly opposes the
bridge operation and views Robert Jordan as a threat to the guerrilleros' safety,
while Robert Jordan senses that Pablo will betray the guerrilleros
and sabotage the mission. Hemingway uses a variety of unflattering
imagery to highlight Pablo's uncooperative and confrontational nature,
often comparing Pablo to a bull, a boar, and other stubborn and
unpleasant animals.
In virtually all of his actions, Pablo displays a selfish
lack of restraint, an irresponsible individualism that contrasts
with Robert Jordan's pragmatic and morally motivated outlook. Pablo
rashly follows his impulses, whether in the cruel slaughter of the
Fascists in his hometown or in the theft of Robert Jordan's explosives. Although
this self-indulgence made Pablo a strong and courageous fighter
when he was younger, it now proves a liability, for it sows dissent
within the guerrilla band and jeopardizes the mission. As Pilar
says, Pablo once would have sacrificed anything for the Republican
cause but has gone bad as the war has dragged on and now wavers
in his loyalties.
Despite Pablo's disagreeable characteristics, however,
he is not an evil man, and we cannot label him a villain. Although
he is stubborn, rash, and sometimes brutal, Pablo displays a clear
sense of conscience and realizes when he has done something wrong.
He wishes he could bring back to life the Fascists he massacred
in his town, and he characterizes his theft of Robert Jordan's explosives
as a moment of weakness. At the same time, however, it is impossible
to ignore the fact that Pablo feels remorse over a deed only after it's
too late to do anything about it. Above all, Pablo fears death and is
exhausted with the war. He simply wants the war to end so that he may
live a peaceful life in the country along with Pilar and his horsesa
sentiment that is difficult to judge harshly. Ironically, it is Pablo,
not Robert Jordan, who survives at the end of the novel. However,
although Pablo stays alive, he does so without the moral strength
that Robert Jordan maintains and develops throughout For Whom
the Bell Tolls.
Pilar
Arguably the most colorful and likable character in For
Whom the Bell Tolls, Pilar embodies the earthiness, strength,
and wisdom of the Spanish peasantry. A large, robust, part-gypsy
woman, Pilar exercises great influence over the band of guerrillerosin
fact, we quickly become aware that Pablo leads the band in name
only. The strong and stable Pilar provides the motivating force
behind many of the novel's events. She pushes Robert Jordan and
Maria's romance, commands the allegiance of the guerrilla fighters,
and organizes the guerrilleros' brief alliance with El Sordo. She
acts as the support structure for the camp as she unites the band
of guerrilla fighters into a family, cooks for all, and sews Robert
Jordan's packs. In short, Pilar manipulates the most important characters
in For Whom the Bell Tolls and sets in place many
of the encounters that drive the plot.
Pilar, though practical, often relies on intuitive, mystical,
gypsy folk wisdom. Shrewd and worldly-wise, she claims a deep connection
to the primitive forces of fate. She claims to be able to smell death,
and she describes the smell in repulsively naturalistic detail. She
reads palms and interprets sexual experiences. Despite Robert Jordan's
cynicism, Pilar's predictions do come true. Pilar exhibits the inevitable
sadness that comes with knowledge: Neither bull force nor bull
courage lasted, she knew now, and what did last? I last. . . . But
for what? In the end, the only aspect of Pilar's personality that
seems not to show wisdom is her unswerving commitment to and belief
in the Republican side, which ultimately loses the war.
Maria
The young, gentle Maria catches Robert Jordan's eye from
the moment he meets her. She exudes a natural, glowing beauty, despite the
fact that she has recently suffered a traumatic rape and has had most
of her hair shorn off. Though she is vulnerable and lays her emotions
bare, she exhibits an inner strength, determination, and resilience
that enable her to bear her difficult circumstances. Some critics
contend that Hemingway intends Maria to represent the land of Spain
itself, ravaged by the warring forces beyond her comprehension,
yet always enduring, beautiful, and loving. Indeed, Hemingway frequently
uses earth imagery to describe Maria, comparing her hair to the
golden brown of a grain field and her breasts to small hills.
In this light, Robert Jordan's closeness with Maria mirrors his
closeness with Spain, his adopted country.
As Robert Jordan's love interest, Maria provides the impetus
for his personal development from an unfeeling thinker and doer
to a romantic individual. In his conversations with General Golz
and with Maria early in the novel, Robert Jordan reveals his belief
that he does not have time for women during the war. Even after
Robert meets Maria, he remains closed to extreme emotion or romance. Though
in love with her, Robert Jordan still shuts her out whenever he
must think about his work. However, by the end of the novel, Robert
Jordan thanks Maria for everything that she has taught him and faces
the day of his mission noting that he has integrated his commitments
to work and to love. Maria, determined to embrace their love fully,
teaches Robert Jordan how to resolve his tensions between love and
work.
Some critics of For Whom the Bell Tolls consider
Maria a weak link in the novel because her characterization depends
so heavily on the effect she has on Robert Jordan rather than on
her own motivations and conflicts. These critics argue that Maria's
submissiveness and the speed with which her affair with Robert Jordan
progresses are unrealistic. They assert that Maria is not a believable
character but rather a stereotype or the embodiment of a male fantasy.
Some feminist critics have blanched at Hemingway's treatment of
Maria's rape, especially at the fact that sexual intercourse with
Robert Jordan appears to heal Maria instantaneously. But although
Maria does come across as a rather static character, this flatness
renders her symbolic importance all the more apparent. Maria's lovely
image endures beyond the last pages of the novel, an emblem of a
land that maintains its beauty, strength, and dignity in the face
of forces that threaten to tear it apart.