Analysis of Major Characters
Billy Budd
Distinguished by his striking good looks and affable nature,
Billy's primary quality is his extraordinary, even disturbing innocence.
At twenty-one years of age, he has never directly confronted evil.
Due to his good looks, he has always been well liked and admired
wherever he goes. As a result, he naïvely takes the view that other
people always mean him the best. He has not developed the prudent
cynicism of a figure like the Dansker, who is well aware of man's
evil inclinations. He has no defense against a hateful man such
as Claggart, and cannot even perceive the malice in Claggart's sarcastic comment
about Billy's accident with the soup. If Billy had believed it when
the Dansker told him that Claggart was plotting against Billy, he
might have been able to protect himself. But Billy is blinded by
his own openhearted nature, and he misjudges the malevolent Claggart as
a friend.
Billy's demise is brought about by a combination of his
own weaknesses and evil influences that are outside of him and beyond his
comprehension. Along with his naïve trust in others, his weaknesses
include his speech impediment, which renders him unable to defend
himself when Claggart accuses him of mutiny. Melville presents this
speech impediment as more than a physical condition, howeverBilly's
hesitancy and speechlessness seem directly related to his ignorance
and innocence. He has no words with which to confront Claggart because
he cannot understand Claggart's evil or formulate any clear thoughts
about him. Faced with Claggart's lie, he can think of no way to
rebut him other than with brute force. Similarly, Billy is unable
to identify and condemn the conspirators on the ship adequately
so as to nip the situation before it buds. Essentially, Billy's
mental and emotional shortcomings render him extremely vulnerable
to the evil influences on board the ship, although the evil itself
lies in other people.
Melville portrays Billy's innocence as something to be
both admired and pitied. In a number of ways, Billy's fate parallels
that of Jesus Christ, suggesting that the sacrifice of Billy's innocence
represents both a significant loss for the world and a hope for
mankind's redemption. It would be a mistake, however, to view Billy simply
as a Christ figure. Billy is a flawed human being, even violent at
times. Unlike Christ, Billy does not willingly or even wittingly
sacrifice himself for the sake of others. Whereas Christ, in his
death, intentionally takes all of the sins of the world upon himself
to save humankind from evil, Billy dies because he cannot comprehend
evil or defend himself adequately against it. In this sense, Billy
is more human than Christwhat happens to Billy more closely resembles something
that could happen to us, and we are perhaps able to pity him and
empathize with him more deeply.
Claggart
With no power to annul the elemental
evil in him, though readily enough he could hide it; apprehending the
good, but powerless to be it; a nature like Claggart's, surcharged
with energy as such natures almost invariably are, what recourse
is left to it but to recoil upon itself and, like the scorpion for
which the Creator alone is responsible, act out to the end the part
allotted it.
If Billy represents innocence in the novel, the older,
higher-ranked Claggart represents evil. Claggart's innate wickedness
is causeless and seemingly limitless. His motives are far more sophisticated
and subtle than Billy can comprehend. Billy lacks awareness of the
discrepancies that exist between human action and human intention, always
taking actions at face value; Claggart, on the other hand, exhibits
a great understanding of deception and ambiguity and makes frequent
use of them in his nefarious plotsfor instance, he shows kindness
toward Billy to mask his unkind intentions.
Because Claggart carefully hides his own motives and
intentions, he has a tendency to assume that other people are also
motivated by hidden malice, and he overinterprets the actions of
others in order to find the ill will concealed within them. Deeply
egocentric, Claggart obtains sustenance from envy. When Billy spills
the soup, Claggart assumes that Billy has purposely directed this
action toward him, utterly ignoring the obvious indication that
Billy simply spilled by accident. Seeking to destroy Billy, Claggart
employs underhanded and vicious methods, falsely accusing Billy
of mutiny in order to see him killed.
In the novel's Christian allegory, Claggart represents
Satan, working tirelessly to pervert goodness and defeat morality
and human trust. On another level, Claggart represents the serpent
that tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. When Claggart's false
allegation prompts Billy to strike him violently, Claggart has effectively
coaxed Billy into abandoning his virtue and committing an evil deed.
Indeed, the narrator refers to Claggart's corpse as a dead snake.
Thus, it is possible to interpret Billy's death as a double victory
for Claggart: Billy dies, as Claggart wished, and he falls from moral
grace, as well.
Captain Vere
Vere symbolizes the conflict between the individual's
inner self and the role society forces the individual to play. Vere
likes Billy and distrusts Claggart, and he seems not to believe
Claggart's accusations against Billy. When Billy strikes Claggart,
Vere feels sympathy toward Billy; he does not seem to believe that
Billy has committed a terrible sin. However, Vere ignores his inner
emotions, convenes a court to try Billy, and urges the jury to disregard
their own feelings of compassion and punish Billy according to the
letter of the law.
As a man, Vere exonerates Billy, but as a ship's captain,
he finds himself duty-bound to punish him, allowing his role as
a captain to supersede his inner conscience. He does this partly
to avoid taking responsibility for Billy's death, making him the
parallel of Pontius Pilate in the novel's Christian allegory. But
he also sacrifices Billy because he believes in the ultimate supremacy
of society's laws over the desires and impulses of individuals.
With this belief, and in his actions throughout the later part of
the novel, Vere demonstrates that he places greater faith in reason
and rational philosophy than he does in the dictates of his own
heart. Famous for his wide reading and his love of philosophy, Vere
is in some ways too cerebral to be a leader of men, and in his rigorous
adherence to the rule of law he fails in his moral responsibility
to Billy.
We are likely to feel that Vere is wrong in applying
the letter of the law rather than following his heart, and one of
the basic questions that this novel poses is why Vere is wrong to
do this. One possible explanation may be that the rules governing
the treatment of someone in Billy's situation are predicated on
mistrust and cynicism about human beings. In the eyes of the law,
someone who strikes and kills his accuser, as Billy does, must be
guilty of murder, and is probably guilty of the crime for which
he was initially accused, as well. Billy's individual circumstances
are too unique and complex to be taken into consideration within
the law. The novel remains ambiguous about which is paramount, the
good of society or the good of the individual; still, it does make
clear that Vere is racked with guilt after putting the law ahead
of his conscience. Vere's last words before he dies are a repetition
of Billy's name, suggesting that he is unable to let go of his sense
of debt to Billy.