Study Questions & Essay Topics
Study Questions
1. Bernard is criticized by the Director
for not acting “infantile” enough. Discuss how and why the World State
infantilizes its citizens.
The World State infantilizes its citizens
by allowing them instant gratification and denying them responsibility.
It assigns every citizen to a caste and a particular social function
before birth, it encourages its citizens to use soma regularly
and to seek instant sexual gratification, and it conditions its
citizens to have no identity independent of the World State. John
compares the dependence of Delta workers on soma to
a prolonged childhood. Their reaction to John’s call to revolution
resembles a childhood temper tantrum. The lifelong process of conditioning
socializes the citizens into infantile dependence on the State through
the lures of pleasure, security, and happiness. Like children, they
are never allowed to make independent moral choices. Instead, these
choices are made for them through conditioned, blind obedience to
the World State’s moral laws. All of this occurs in the name of
stability. Infantilization is implemented through scientific discoveries
in human psychology, such as Pavlovian theory and hypnopaedia.
2. Discuss the relation between the
sexes in the World State. How do men and women interact? Who holds
the power in social situations, in the workplace, and in the government?
When the Director gives his new students
a tour of the Hatchery at the beginning of Brave New World, it
is made immediately clear that the students are all boys. This is
the first of many hints that women occupy positions of inferior
power and status in the World State. Another clue comes soon after,
when we learn that in order to retain the State’s control over reproduction,
many of the female fetuses are sterilized—but none of the male fetuses
are. The Malthusian belt, containing regulation contraceptives,
is another example of the burden placed on women to avoid pregnancies.
In sexual relations, men and women seem to be equally promiscuous
and equally free to initiate contact. Lenina is just as ready as
Bernard to capitalize on the fame brought through association with
John by spending time with as many partners as possible. But in
work situations and in the government men are undeniably in charge.
Assuming that Lenina and Fanny are Beta females, there are very
few Alpha women in the novel and none about whom we learn anything
significant. The people in positions of power—in propaganda (Bernard,
Helmholtz), in the Hatchery (the Director, Henry), and in the government
(Mustapha Mond)—are all male. In the social realm the relations between
the sexes are liberalized, but in the realms of work and politics
the power remains squarely in the hands of men. It is an open question
whether this state of affairs is part of the satirical target of Brave
New World or whether it simply reflects the culture in
which the novel was written.
3. Discuss the parallels between Brave
New World and Shakespeare’s The Tempest.
Many critics interpret The Tempest as
an allegory of imperialism because Prospero decides to raise Caliban
and “civilize” him. England has a long history of colonizing “savages”
it saw as being in need of “civilizing.” In some respects, the World
State practices a form of British imperialism. “Civilizing the savages”
often involved replacing native languages with English. There are
hints that English is the only language in the World State. Polish,
German, and French are referred to as “dead languages.”
Therefore, it seems that the World State has eradicated most other
cultures and languages except for a few “Savage Reservations.” John
identifies with Miranda by quoting her, and, like Miranda, he is
raised in isolation from the culture of his parents. However, John
resembles Caliban, because he becomes known as “the Savage” when
he travels to the World State.
Bernard also parallels different characters from The
Tempest. Like Prospero’s brother, Bernard uses another
person to further his own selfish interests. He uses John to acquire
greater popularity and status. However, Bernard also becomes John’s
appointed guardian, so he becomes John’s “father” on one level.
Bernard’s role as guardian is to expose John to “civilization.”
Therefore, Bernard plays Prospero, as John plays Caliban. London
society’s reaction to John reproduces the stereotype of the “Noble
Savage.” This cliché often functioned as a justification for the
cultural genocide practiced in British Imperialism. “Civilized”
British culture played the parent role to the “child-like savage”
by raising him above his “savage, childish” culture. Therefore,
the relationship between Bernard and John dramatizes the thematic
content of The Tempest, as well as the history
of British imperialism.
4. In what ways does the World State
treat people like commodities?
The Predestinators estimate the need for
various members of each caste, and the Hatchery produces human beings
to match their mathematical figures. This directly follows the economic
rules of supply and demand. Through the Podsnap and Bokanovsky Processes,
the lower castes are mass-produced on assembly lines to satisfy
the needs of a market, just like any other standardized manufactured
good. Linda’s doctor and Bernard are content to allow Linda to abuse soma even
though they know it will eventually kill her. The doctor explains
to John that it is better for her to die as quickly and quietly
as possible now that she cannot perform any economically productive
work. The doctor voices the World State’s belief that human beings
are things meant to be “used up until they wear out.” Just as with
manufactured goods, when people get old and worn out, they are thrown
away. With respect to sexual pleasure, World State citizens are
conditioned to view themselves, and others, as commodities to be
consumed like any other manufactured good. As Bernard says, Henry
and the Predestinator view Lenina as a “bit of meat,” and Lenina
thinks of herself “as meat.”
Suggested Essay Topics
1. Discuss the relationship between
science, religion, and political power in the World State.
2. What are Mustapha Mond’s arguments
against freedom? Is there any validity to them? Do you think there
is a “winner” of his debate with John?
3. It seems undeniable that most
World State members are happy, though people like John, Bernard,
and Helmholtz might criticize the quality of their lives. What,
then, is wrong with World State society? Discuss the relationship
between truth and happiness, and the use of soma?
4. Is John really more free than
the World State members? How is he conditioned in his own way?
5. How are the castes distinguished
from each other? What is their purpose? Do you think they reflect
any aspect of contemporary society or are they simply a hypothetical consequence
of a society like the World State?