Context
Plot Overview
Character List
Analysis of Major Characters
Themes, Motifs, & Symbols
Part One, Chapter 1
Part One, Chapter 2
Part One, Chapter 3
Part One, Chapter 4
Part One, Chapter 5
Part One, Chapters 6–7
Part Two, Chapter 1
Part Two, Chapters 2–3
Part Two, Chapters 4–5
Part Two, Chapter 6
Part Two, Chapter 7
Part Three, Chapters 1–2
Part Three, Chapters 3–4
Part Three, Chapter 5
Part Three, Chapter 6
Part Three, Chapter 7
Important Quotations Explained
Key Facts
Study Questions & Essay Topics
Nadsat Glossary
Quiz
Suggestions For Further Reading and Viewing
|
A Clockwork Orange Anthony Burgess
Analysis of Major Characters
Alex
Alex is the narrator and protagonist of A Clockwork
Orange. Every word on the page is his, and we experience
his world through the sensations he describes and the suffering
he endures. He is at once generic and highly individual, mindless
and substantive, knowingly evil and innocently likeable.
At first, Alex appears to be little more than a robot
programmed for violence. In the world of the novel, youth violence
is a major social problem, and Alex represents a typicalthough
highly successfulteenager. He dresses in the heighth of fashion,
frequents all of the popular hangouts, and is the undisputed leader
of his gang. Like most teenagers in A Clockwork Orange,
Alex speaks in a highly stylized slang called nadsat.
Alex is unique in his unyielding commitment to the ideals of violence,
as well as the aesthetic pleasure he takes in his crimes. Alex elevates
his evil behavior to the status of art. Alex loves art itself, particularly
classical music. A devout enthusiast of Beethoven, Mozart, and other
composers, Alex experiences something akin to religious joy when
he listens to classical music. To Alex, the delight he finds in
classical music is closely related to the ecstasy he feels during
acts of violence. When listening to one recording, for example,
Alex imagines carving the whole litso [face] of the creeching [screaming]
world with [his] cut-throat britva [razor]. Throughout the novel,
Alex further emphasizes the connection between music and violence
by reserving his most musical language for the descriptions of his
most brutal crimes.
Alex experiences the pleasures of music and brutality
in a direct and sensuous manner, without mediation or meditation.
Unlike F. Alexander, one of Alex's primary antagonists, Alex remains
completely uninterested in explaining his actions in terms of abstract
or theoretical notions, and he rarely considers himself in a larger
social context. When faced with various hypotheses as to the origin
of his depravity, Alex's responses are staunchly anti-intellectual.
Unlike his probation officer, P.R. Deltoid, Alex believes that evil
represents a natural state for human beings, and is as valid a state
of being as goodness. According to this reasoning, Alex believes
that the State, which seeks to deprive him of the choice to act
cruelly, encroaches on his freedom as an individual. Thus, in choosing
violence, Alex ultimately affirms his sense of self.
Alex's vileness in A Clockwork Orange underlines
the theme that human beings, no matter how depraved, shouldn't be
deprived of their freedom of self-determination. The State's destruction
of Alex's ability to make his own moral choices represents a greater evil
than any of Alex's crimes, since turning Alex into an automaton ultimately
sanctions the notion that human nature is dispensable. Alex truly
grows as a human being only in the last chapter, after the government
removes his conditioning and he can see the error of his ways for
himself, without the prompting of an external, controlling force.
F. Alexander
Though they share a name, F. Alexander and Alex are quite
different from each other. While Alex is an intuitive creature who
makes decisions based on impulse, F. Alexander is an intelligent
type bookman type who behaves according to abstract concepts, which
he ponders from the safety of his country home, far away from the
city streets with which he seems so concerned. F. Alexander thinks
in broad, theoretical terms, and has trouble focusing on specifics. When
Alex begs for mercy after being beaten by the police, F. Alexander
pities him not as a suffering boy, but as an abstract victim of the
modern age. Similarly, when Alex asks him how he expects to improve
Alex's life through the exploitation of his victim status, F. Alexander
can't provide an answer. F. Alexander claims to want to help people like Alex,
but he remains unconcerned with Alex as a particular, individual
person.
F. Alexander's failure to embrace actual human reality
can be read as a criticism of liberalist ideologies, which Burgess
has criticized for being committed to improving the lot of mankind
at the expense of man himself. F. Alexander's belief that man is
a creature of growth and capable of sweetness is a noble one,
especially because he has experienced first-hand the kind of evil
men are capable of. However, his readiness to use Alex, also a creature
of growth and capable of sweetness, as a thing with which to wage
war against the State reveals a certain degree of hypocrisy.
Minister of the Interior
The Minister of the Interior comes into power during the
two years Alex is incarcerated. As the highest-ranking representative
of the State, the Minister embodies the government's changing attitude toward
its citizens. The government he represents is even more repressive
than the one Alex knows in Part One, and its cardinal virtue is
the stability of society. To achieve this goal, the Minister has put
two sweeping policies into effect with regard to criminal behavior.
For already-incarcerated offenders, the Minister has decided to move
ahead with an experimental rehabilitation program that destroys
criminal tendencies. In this way, he can free up jail space for political
dissidents, who threaten the new State order. In his other policy
modification, the Minister gives badges to the remaining street
thugs so that these violent criminals can authoritatively impose
social order.
With the character of the Minister, Burgess satirizes
the tendency of socialist governments to overlook the needs and
rights of individuals who threaten communal order. Personal liberties
mean nothing to the Minister, and neither do principles. He candidly
admits to having sacrificed Alex's individual, human qualities in
exchange for a passive young man who can't help but act in a socially
acceptable manner. In these ways, the Minister differs from both
F. Alexander and P.R. Deltoid. Unlike the former, he doesn't care
about principles, and, unlike the latter, he doesn't bother to study
the origins of violence. Rather, the Minister possesses a distinctly
utilitarian attitude toward accomplishing the goal of total State
security. Ironically, this acutely pragmatic attitude also prompts
the Minister to cure Alex, when the Minister realizes that he needs
Alex's endorsement to quell the public outrage stirred up by F.
Alexander. In ensuring society's stability, the Minister always
observes the following mantra: The point is that it works.
Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|