|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act One, continued
Summary
From the beginning of Nora’s conversation with Mrs.
Linde to Nora’s promise to talk to Torvald about finding Mrs. Linde work.
Nora greets the female visitor hesitantly, and the visitor
realizes that Nora does not remember her. Finally, Nora recognizes
the woman as her childhood friend, Kristine Linde and remarks that
Mrs. Linde has changed since they last met nine or ten years earlier.
Mrs. Linde says that she has just arrived by steamer that day. Nora
remarks that Mrs. Linde looks paler and thinner than she remembered
and apologizes profusely for not writing three years earlier, when
she read in the paper that Mrs. Linde’s husband had died.
Nora asks if Mrs. Linde’s husband left her very much
money, and Mrs. Linde admits that he did not. Nora then asks whether
he left her any children. When Mrs. Linde says that he didn’t, Nora
asks once more if he left her “nothing at all then?” Mrs.
Linde says that he did not leave her even “an ounce of grief,” but
this sentiment is lost on Nora. After commenting how awful life
must be for Mrs. Linde, Nora begins to talk about her three children
and then apologizes for babbling on about her own life instead of
listening to Mrs. Linde. First, though, she feels that she must
tell Mrs. Linde about Torvald’s new position at the bank, and Mrs.
Linde responds enthusiastically.
When Mrs. Linde comments that it would be nice to have
enough money, Nora talks about how she and Torvald will have “pots
and pots” of money. Nora tells Mrs. Linde that life hasn’t always
been so happy, however. Nora once had to work as well—doing tasks
like sewing and crocheting. Torvald also had to take on more than
one job, but he became ill, and the entire family had to go south
to Italy because of Torvald’s condition. Nora explains that the
trip to Italy was quite expensive and that she obtained the money
from her father. The family left for Italy at just about the time
that Nora’s father died. Nora excitedly says that her husband has
been completely well since returning from Italy and that the children
are very healthy too. She apologizes again for babbling on about
her happiness and monopolizing the conversation.
Mrs. Linde describes how she married a husband of whom
she was not particularly fond. Because her mother was confined to
bed, Mrs. Linde had to look after her two younger brothers. She
says she feels it would not have been justifiable to turn down her
suitor’s proposal and the money that would come with marriage to
him. When her husband died, however, his business collapsed, and
she was left penniless. After three years spent working odd jobs
to support her family, Mrs. Linde is finally free, because her mother
died and her brothers are grown. She adds that with no one dependent
upon her, her life is even sadder, because she has no one for whom
to live. She reveals that she came to town to find some office work.
When Nora protests that Mrs. Linde ought not work, Mrs.
Linde snaps that Nora could not possibly understand the hard work
that she has had to do. She quickly apologizes for her anger, saying
that her predicament has made her bitter. She explains that because
she has no one for whom to work, she must look after only herself, which
has made her selfish. She admits that she is happy at the news of
Torvald’s new job because of the implications it could have for her
personal interests. Nora promises to talk to her husband about helping
Mrs. Linde. Analysis
Nora’s first conversation with Mrs. Linde plays a key
role in establishing Nora’s childlike, self-centered, and insensitive
character. Though she purports to be interested in Mrs. Linde’s
problems, Nora repeatedly turns the conversation back to her own
life with Torvald. Nora’s self-centeredness is further demonstrated
in her revelation that she failed to write to Mrs. Linde after her
husband passed away. It is only now, three years after the fact,
that Nora expresses her sympathy; up to this point, she has made
no effort to think beyond herself, and the fact that she does so
now seems only a matter of polite reflex. Like an impetuous
child, Nora does not filter her thoughts, expressing what comes
to mind without regard for what is and what is not appropriate,
as when she tactlessly comments that Mrs. Linde’s looks have declined
over the years. Though she recognizes that Mrs. Linde is poor, she
unabashedly delights in the fact that she and Torvald will soon
have “pots and pots” of money. She does not recognize that such
comments might be hurtful to her old friend.
From a structural point of view, Nora, as the drama’s
protagonist, must develop over the course of the play. Because her
first conversation with Mrs. Linde shows Nora to be childlike in
her understanding of the world, it becomes apparent that Nora’s
development will involve education, maturation, and the shedding
of her seeming naïveté. Whereas Nora clings to romantic notions
about love and marriage, Mrs. Linde has a more realistic understanding
of marriage, gained from her experience of being left with “not
even an ounce of grief” after her husband’s death. Nora’s incredulity
at Mrs. Linde’s remark indicates to Mrs. Linde, and to us, that
Nora is sheltered and somewhat unsophisticated. The thread between
Nora’s initial interactions with Torvald and Mrs. Linde is the tension between
Nora’s childish nature and her need to grow out of it.
As someone who has experienced an existence that is anything but
doll-like, Mrs. Linde seems poised to be Nora’s teacher and guide
on her journey to maturity. Mrs. Linde recounts hardship after hardship
and sacrifice after sacrifice—a far cry from the pampering that
Nora receives from Torvald. At the same time, both Mrs. Linde’s
and Nora’s marriages involve sacrificing themselves to another in
exchange for money. Nora becomes her husband’s plaything and delights
in the comforts he provides her, while Mrs. Linde marries her husband
for money so that she can support her sick mother and dependent
younger brothers. Again and again in A Doll’s House, women
sacrifice their personal desires, their ambitions, and their dignity.
While Nora marries for her own welfare, however, Mrs. Linde does
so for the welfare of her family.
Unlike many of the dramatists who came before him, Ibsen doesn’t
portray rich, powerful, or socially significant people in his plays.
Rather, he populates his dramas with ordinary middle-class characters.
Ibsen’s language too is commonplace. Though his dialogue is uncomplicated
and without rhetorical flourish, it subtly conveys more
than it seems to. For instance, Nora’s insensitivity to Mrs. Linde’s
plight manifests itself when she speaks of her three lovely children immediately after
learning that Mrs. Linde has none. That Ibsen’s dialogue is apparently
simple—yet full of loaded -subtext—sets Ibsen’s drama apart from
earlier and contemporary verse plays. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||