Ender's Game

Orson Scott Card

Study Questions and Essay Topics

Key Facts


Study Questions

Why does Orson Scott Card use a young boy as the protagonist in a book about a great war between humanity and aliens?

Card chooses a child because one of the major points of Ender's Game is that children are not qualitatively different from adults. They may be smaller, but their emotions and thoughts are just as valid as older peoples'. What makes someone human is their ability to communicate their thoughts, not their size or their age. Children are often not taken very seriously, and Card wants us to take Ender and all of the other children in his book extremely seriously. The comparison goes both way—if children are just as complex as adults are then adults must also be very similar to children. This is also true in Ender's Game, since children manipulate adults frequently, and the entire adult world is counting on a child for salvation. The point is not necessarily to glorify the role of children as much as to take away the false distinction that is made between childhood and adulthood. In many more ways than we commonly imagine, little kids are just like mature adults, and in just as many ways older people often act like children.

How are good and evil addressed in Ender's Game?

Card does not definitively say whether he believes that human nature is inherently good or evil. All people are complex creatures filled with conflicting desires and attributes. As a result, there is no such thing as pure good or pure evil. Earlier on it appears that Ender represents pure good and that Peter is pure evil, but these distinctions quickly fall apart. Ender certainly tries to be good, and he cares deeply about others, but the summation of his attempts to be good could hardly be called so by the end of the novel. Ender kills Stilson and Bonzo, as well as the entire bugger race except for one queen. Peter, on the other hand, is motivated by nothing except personal gain, and he does not care for people at all. Yet Peter saves many lives by coming to power the way he does. Even when we act for good reasons we cannot be assured of a good outcome. On the other hand, if we believe that certain ends are good, like Graff and Rackham, we may commit evil acts in order to achieve them. However, what matters in the end is the result as much as the person. Peter may have done some good in his life, but it was unintentional, and if he made no attempt to right the wrongs he committed. Ender, who never wanted to hurt anyone, feels responsible for many evils, and he dedicates the remainder of his life to remedying those that he can. A love for humanity and the desire to do no harm to our fellow human beings is a good trait, and even if it leads to certain bad actions or outcomes, those who have it will always try to do the right thing.

What is Card saying about manipulation in Ender's Game?

Everyone seems to be manipulating everyone else in this book, suggesting that manipulation is a universal human trait. Valentine says as much to Ender in the end of the book. At that point he feels as if his entire life he has been manipulated. Valentine points out, quite rightly, that we can never free ourselves from the influences of others, and that people will always be manipulating others. However, what we can do is decide who we will let influence us. She is appealing to Ender to follow the path that she has set up for them, and he agrees to go, for reasons that differ from hers. Ender wants to go to try to help repay his debt to the buggers. This fits fine with what Valentine said, since he is able to follow the course that she wants him to take but for reasons that make it a valid option for him. The choices we make in life are often dictated to us by others, but what Card seems to be suggesting is that we will be happy if we can find our freedom within the road that somebody puts forward—that is, you can trust the influence of those who care about you.

Suggested Essay Topics

Compare the way that Ender treats Bean to the way that Graff treats Ender. What does this say about the role of leadership or authority?

Ender kills two children while only trying to defend himself. What is Card saying about violence?

The buggers can communicate instantaneously, and they fought humans at first because they did not believe that they were sentient beings? Is this a statement about war? About communication?

The I.F. has control over Ender because they were the ones who authorized his birth. Does Card seem to imply that governments or international alliances be allowed to have such control over individuals?

Are the characters in Ender's Game realistic? What features, if any, do they share with real people? What features, if any, do they have that are unique to the book? What does this say about the way people are? What does it say about the way they should be?

More Help

Previous Next
Ender Vs. Peter Motivation

by ICanReadMusicToo, June 03, 2013

I think the foil of the brothers' motivations can be simplified like this:

Ender is always doing the wrong thing for the right reasons:
Ender always wants to do no harm, but is often forced to harm/destroy by situations beyond his control. He does his best to do things in the most moral way, and for only the most moral purposes, but that's not always as possible as he would like.

Peter does the right thing for the wrong reasons:
Peter simply wants to do whatever is the easiest/most beneficial for himself, and is in... Read more


273 out of 292 people found this helpful


by GrammarJunkie18, July 12, 2013

Some theories: Can Peter, Ender, and Valentine represent the id, the ego, and the superego? Seems likely to me. Also, what is the significance of all the names in the novel? Note that Peter, Andrew, and Valentine are saints. What did they do? I guess Valentine is something love-related, and Peter is the bad apostle, right? Also, who were Locke and Demosthenes historically? I know that John Locke was an English philosopher in the 1600s, and Demosthenes was a Greek philosopher, right? And Eros, the name of the planet - what's the significance ... Read more


55 out of 66 people found this helpful


by Cillaejobbigjustnu, October 16, 2013

The teachers doesn't show any compassion to the pupils of the battle school. Althought we (me and my ego's) think that they have more compassion and care alot more of the children than they show through. We think that it is to make strong soldiers and that they don't want them to be weak and want to go home etc.

See all 14 readers' notes   →