Study Questions & Essay Topics
Study Questions
1. The ending
of the giver has been interpreted in a few different
ways. Choose one possible interpretation of the ending and argue
its validity, using clues from the text to explain your conclusions.
The two major interpretations of The
Giver’s ending are that (1) Jonas and
Gabriel have truly escaped the physical boundaries of their society and
discovered a real village in Elsewhere, and (2)
Jonas’s vision of the village is only a hallucination that he experiences
as he and Gabriel freeze to death in the snow in the middle of nowhere.
Both arguments can be solidly supported by references in the text.
In order to argue that the two children freeze to death
in the snow and that their vision of the village is only an illusion,
we can rely on the uncanny similarity between the landscape Jonas
sees—or thinks he sees—and the memories the Giver has transmitted
to him in the past. It is extremely unlikely that Jonas would come
upon a hill that looks just like the hill from his memory of the
ride on the sled, and then come upon an identical sled waiting to
take him to the bottom of the hill. Given that for the last leg
of their journey, Jonas has been relying on memories of sunshine
to keep himself and Gabriel alive and happy, it would make sense
that Jonas relies on the most pleasant memories he has when the
cold and exhaustion grow too much for them. When Jonas admits that
the music he thinks he hears behind him might be “only an echo,”
he could be implying that the vision before him is an echo too—of
his own memory. Another point to consider is that it seems unlikely
that Jonas could travel on a bicycle further than search planes
could fly and that communities that have not gone over to Sameness
could be found so (relatively) close to Jonas’s own community.
To argue that Jonas and Gabriel do survive and reach the
village safely to begin a new life, we can explain that although
the events of the last pages mirror events from Jonas’s memories,
we learn toward the end of the book that Jonas is losing all of
the memories that were transmitted to him by the Giver. The last
memory that brings him joy is not a memory of sunshine, but a “real”
memory of people Jonas has met in his life—his friends and family.
This suggests that the things Jonas sees in the world around him
are really there, since he has lost the memories. The music that
he hears is real, because music was never a part of his memory.
The serendipitous appearance of the sled is strange, but not inconsistent
with the atmosphere of magic and mysticism that pervades Jonas’s
new life and his relationship with the Giver.
2. Among other
things, the community in the giver eliminates most
traditional distinctions between men and women, but occasionally
stereotypes and customs still exist to distinguish male children
from female children and men from women. What rules remain in place
in the community that differentiate men from women? Why do you think
these specific rules were retained while others were not?
Even though Lowry seems to take pains to
eliminate gender stereotypes in the society in The Giver,
supporting the idea that everyone in the society is as similar to
one another as possible, ideas about the differences between men
and women still linger. Of course, it makes sense that girls are
given “special undergarments” at age eleven, but it makes less sense
that girls wear braids with hair ribbons until age nine. The hair
ribbons are the only decorative element mentioned in the entire
novel. Perhaps they are just used to distinguish girls from boys,
ignoring the original, aesthetic purpose of hair ribbons. Another
vestige of gender roles is the structure of the family units: though
the roles of “mother” and “father” are not clearly defined, each
family consists of a father, mother, sister, and brother. Since
no one has sex, and the parents do not produce children together,
the persistence of heterosexual couples is either a meaningless
echo of the traditional nuclear family or an effort to provide both
male and female children with appropriate role models. In any case,
the community seems to appropriate some of the gender distinctions
of pre-Sameness society, but uses them for entirely different purposes.
The Giver, however, seems to have more nostalgic, traditional notions
about gender differences, or at least about femininity. His description
of Rosemary emphasizes traditionally feminine qualities: she is
beautiful, delicate, and sensitive. He has trouble giving her memories
of physical pain and suffering, although he gives them much more
easily to Jonas. Jonas, too, associates femininity with gentleness
and fragility, even though his father is clearly more gentle and
nurturing than his mother. When the Giver tells him about Rosemary,
Jonas thinks that he would never want his “favorite female” Fiona
to suffer as he has suffered, enduring the difficult memories. Perhaps
the nostalgia that the Giver and Jonas feel toward the pre-Sameness
period extends to the pre-Sameness traditions of gender differences.
3. In a book like the
giver, which features a society unlike our own, to whom
some concepts we consider ordinary would seem completely outlandish,
the author must present familiar things—sleds, love, sunburns—with fresh
eyes. Choose something ordinary that is described as extraordinary
in the book, and evaluate Lowry’s success in capturing strangers’
reactions to the familiar object.
One of the first moments when Jonas encounters
something familiar to us, the readers, but totally unfamiliar to
him is the moment when the apple changes in midair. Not only is
the moment significant as the first time we see Jonas experience
something totally new, but it presents an interesting challenge
to both the reader and the writer: at this early point in the story,
Jonas has not yet begun his training, and so he does not expect
unusual things to happen to him. When the apple changes, Lowry must
communicate the quality of its change without using any vocabulary
or ideas that Jonas would not already know. She cannot tell us directly
that there is no color in Jonas’s world, since the entire story
is told from Jonas’s perspective: he does not know what color is,
so he does not know that color exists. Lowry has to show us somehow
that something is missing from Jonas’s world, so that we recognize
the “change” that Jonas witnesses as the restoration of the missing
quality.
To accomplish this, Lowry places subtle clues throughout
the story that call attention to the absence of color. When Lily
describes the newchild’s eyes, for example, she mentions that they
are “funny” like Jonas’s, without making any mention of their color. Jonas’s
meditation about his own eyes continues for a long time without
any mention of their color, only of their shade, something that
might strike us as slightly unusual. When Jonas takes note of all of
the physical qualities of the apple after he has seen it briefly change,
he mentions size, shape, and shade, but never the color. This clue
is extremely subtle, since “shade” can be a synonym for “color.” The
discordant element here is Jonas’s statement that the shade of the
apple is “nondescript” like his tunic: we assume the apple is red,
and few people would call red “nondescript.” In using subtle indications
like these, Lowry allows us to participate in Jonas’s bewilderment
at the apple’s change—we stretch our imaginations wondering how
an apple could change—and at the same time prepares us for the Giver’s
revelation that Jonas is beginning to see color.
Suggested Essay Topics
1. One of the more controversial
topics that Lowry touches upon in the giver is
euthanasia, or the practice of ending someone’s life to ease their
suffering. Jonas’s community practices euthanasia on very old citizens
as well as upon unhealthy newchildren. Jonas’s horror at this practice motivates
him to take drastic measures to reform the society, and yet many
people in our own society consider euthanasia to be a compassionate
practice and one that should be available to all citizens. Discuss
the attitude toward euthanasia as expressed in the giver. Does
the novel condemn, promote, or conditionally accept the practice?
2. It is difficult for us to
imagine a world without color, personal freedoms, and love, but
in the giver, the society relinquishes these things
in order to make room for total peace and safety. Consider the pleasures
and experiences that our own society discourages in order to preserve
the public good (certain recreational drugs, for example.) In the
context of the lessons Jonas learns in the giver, explain
why we should or should not sacrifice an orderly community in order
to allow individuals more spiritually or sensually satisfying experiences.
Where do you think the line between public safety and personal freedom should
be drawn?
3. Read at least one other novel
depicting a dystopian society. What techniques does this society
use to maintain order? How does its structure differ from the community’s
in the giver?
4. Consider the community’s repression
of sexuality in the giver. What function does it
serve in helping the society run smoothly? What dangers does sexuality
pose to a structured community, and how are those dangers different
from the dangers posed by love? If you have read brave new
world by Aldous Huxley, compare that society’s use of sexuality
and promiscuity to keep people from accessing deeper feelings to the
giver’s restriction of sexuality for essentially the same ends.
5. Despite the community’s emphasis
on precise language, language is often used as a tool for social
control in the giver. Choose two or three words
used in the society (examples are release, newchild, Stirrings)
that distort or conceal the meaning of the words we use now in order
to promote the rules and conventions of the community, and describe
how their use affects the behavior and attitudes of the people in
the community.
6. the giver is
one of the most frequently censored books in America, partially
because some critics believe that Lowry is promoting the community
Jonas lives in as an exemplary place to live. Although it might
be extreme to suppose that Lowry supports all of the institutions
that her protagonist rejects, examine the giver’s
attitude toward the community rules and culture. Which aspects of
the community are the targets of the most criticism and condemnation?
Do any aspects of the society escape criticism?
7. Analyze the giver’s
relationship to the social questions that were most frequently discussed
in the early 1990s. To what degree is the
giver a cautionary tale? Who is the object of its warning?