Waiting for Godot

Samuel Beckett

How to Cite This SparkNote

Bibliography

Full Bibliographic Citation

MLA

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Waiting for Godot.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. Web. 26 May 2016.

The Chicago Manual of Style

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Waiting for Godot.” SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/godot/ (accessed May 26, 2016).

APA

SparkNotes Editors. (n.d.). SparkNote on Waiting for Godot. Retrieved May 26, 2016, from http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/godot/

In Text Citation

MLA

“Their conversation is awkward, especially when she mentions Wickham, a subject Darcy clearly wishes to avoid” (SparkNotes Editors).

APA

“Their conversation is awkward, especially when she mentions Wickham, a subject Darcy clearly wishes to avoid” (SparkNotes Editors, n.d.).

Footnote

The Chicago Manual of Style

Chicago requires the use of footnotes, rather than parenthetical citations, in conjunction with a list of works cited when dealing with literature.

1 SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Waiting for Godot.” SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/godot/ (accessed May 26, 2016).


Please be sure to cite your sources. For more information about what plagiarism is and how to avoid it, please read our article on The Plagiarism Plague. If you have any questions regarding how to use or include references to SparkNotes in your work, please tell us.

More Help

Previous Next
Online Movie Version of Godot: Watch Instantly

by godot2013, September 27, 2013

YOUTUBE LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NztNufWhD4E
YOUTUBE LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NztNufWhD4E

Official Online web series adaptation of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot

Found this review online:

http://comedytvisdead.com/2013/09/25/review-while-waiting-for-godot/

I thought it was really funny!!

0 Comments

4 out of 6 people found this helpful

An erroneous commentary

by KatyErport, April 19, 2016

Dear author of this analysis. Becket does not write in 'Waiting for Godot' that the four gospels present different accounts of the two thieves. What he writes, and what really is the case, is that only one of the four gospels present this account. And hence, the conclusion that you have made regarding the trustworthiness of the Bible is irrelevant and in fact deceiving.