|
|
Invisible Man Ralph Ellison
Chapters Two & Three
Summary: Chapter Two
Recalling his time at the college, the narrator
remembers with particular fascination the college's bronze statue
of its Founder, a black man. He describes the statue as cold and
paternal, its eyes empty. At the end of his junior year, the narrator
takes a job driving Mr. Norton, one of the college's white millionaire
founders, around the campus. In an attempt to show the old gentleman
the countryside near the campus, the narrator unwittingly drives Norton
to an area of ramshackle cabins. The cabins, which once served as
slave quarters, now house poor black sharecroppers. Though Norton
finds the cabins intriguing, the narrator immediately regrets having
driven him to this area, as he knows that Jim Trueblood lives here.
The college regards Trueblood with hatred and distrust because he
has impregnated his own daughter. Norton reacts with horror when
the narrator reveals this information, but he insists on speaking
with Trueblood.
Trueblood explains that he had a strange dream and woke
to find himself having sex with his daughter. Norton listens with
a morbid, voyeuristic fascination. Trueblood expresses wonder at
the fact that white people have showered him with more money and
help than before he committed the unspeakable taboo of incest. Norton, shocked
at the story, hands Trueblood a one-hundred-dollar bill to buy toys
for his children. He gets back into the car in a daze and requests
some whiskey to calm his nerves.
Summary: Chapter Three
The narrator, fearing that Norton might die
from shock, drives to the nearest tavern, the Golden Day, which
serves black people and also happens to be a brothel. As he approaches
the Golden Day, the narrator encounters a group of mentally disturbed
black war veterans who are being allowed an afternoon outside their home.
Their attendant is nowhere to be seen. The narrator intends to dash
in and out of the tavern, as the establishment has a bad reputation,
but the proprietor refuses to sell take-out whiskey. Some of the
veterans help carry Norton inside, since he has fallen unconscious.
As they soon as they pour some whiskey down his throat, he begins
to regain consciousness. The brutish attendant in charge of the
veterans now appears, shouting down from the area of the building
devoted to the brothel. Clad only in shorts, he asks why the veterans
are yelling. A brawl ensues. Norton falls unconscious again, and
the narrator and one of the veterans carry him upstairs to where
the prostitutes stay.
This particular veteran claims to be a doctor and a graduate
of the college. After Norton wakes, the veteran mocks Norton's interest
in the narrator and the college. He says that Norton views the narrator
as a mark on his scorecard of achievement rather than as a man and
that the narrator thinks of Norton not as a man but as a god. He
calls the narrator an automaton stricken with a blindness that makes
him do Norton's bidding and claims that this blindness is the narrator's
chief asset. Norton becomes angry and demands that the narrator
take him back to the college. During the ride back, Norton remains
completely silent.
Analysis: Chapters Two & Three
With Ellison's first detailed image of Chapter Two, he
extends his critique of the ideas upheld by Booker T. Washington
and his followers. The statue honoring the Founder seems to depict
an abstract father symbol rather than an actual individual. Though
the Founder has allegedly made a great mark on history, we never
even learn his name. His individuality and humanity seem lost in
the statue's cold bronze and stiff expression. The Founder's anonymity
echoes the absence of Booker T. Washington's name in the narrator's
graduation speech after the battle royal in Chapter One, an absence made
conspicuous by the narrator's verbatim quotes from Washington's
Atlanta Exposition Address. Ellison uses the Founder as a double
for Washington. Both men seemingly set out to design a program for
the advancement of black Americans (Washington founded the school
now called Tuskegee University), and both, hailed as great visionaries,
enjoy fervent worship on the part of their followers. Sadly, within
the text both have become invisible men: not even a record of their
names exists in the novel. By omitting their names, Ellison attempts
to signify such figures' metaphoric invisibility within the real
worldthe futility of their actions, their failure to exert any
real force on society. The novel also suggests that both men suffer
blindness: with the statue's empty eyes, Ellison implies that
Washington's philosophy is illusionary.
Part of Ellison's derision of Washington lies in his belief
that Washington underestimated the power of prejudice among white Americans.
Yet, in this chapter, Ellison also explores prejudice from a new
angle, examining the social prejudice that emerges from economic
and educational inequalities and that can exist between educated
and uneducated blacks. Just as the monetary rewards of the battle
royal incite the narrator and his classmates to turn on one another
in Chapter One, the rewards of social advancement offered by the
college incite the students and faculty to turn their backs on one
of the least-empowered groups of American blacks: the poor sharecroppers.
In an attempt to conform to the role of the model black citizen
expected of them by white trustees, these higher-status blacks disown
the dishonorable Jim Trueblood. This attempt to break from the lower-status
blacks in order to gain greater favor with the white community seems
to illustrate the narrator's grandfather's statement in Chapter
One that blind conformity to the good slave role constitutes an
act of treachery.
With the character of Mr. Norton, the novel introduces
another instance of white condescension and self-aggrandizement
masquerading as generosity and philanthropy. Norton's interest in
the college stems more from self-interest than more a genuine desire
to improve the difficulties of black Americans. Explaining to the
narrator why he became involved in the college, he says, in the
Golden Day, I felt . . . that your people were somehow closely
connected with my destiny (Chapter Three, emphasis added). Earlier,
in the car, he tells the narrator, You are my fate (Chapter Two,
emphasis added). Norton never concedes to the narrator the right
to claim his fate as his own; instead, their fates become one, with
Norton claiming ownership over both. This seemingly benevolent white
man actually possesses a latent racism, and he takes pride in his
work with the college because it has allowed him to direct and control human
life. Although he states that the students constitute his fate and
that it is his destiny to improve their lives, Norton has, in reality, put
himself in the position of determining their common fate.
Norton's influence over the lives of the black
students remains an insidious one; he exerts power over them while
appearing to empower them. This element of deception and illusion
reintroduces Ellison's motif of invisibility and blindness. Norton
exerts his power invisibly, without appearing to be a controlling
force; indeed, his power allows him to become intimately involved
in the lives of thousands of students who have never even seen him. There
is a chilling undertone to his remark to the narrator that [y]ou
are bound to a great dream and to a beautiful monument (Chapter
Two, emphasis added). The narrator believes that the school offers
him freedom, but, in fact, he remains tied to the dreams and monuments
of men like Nortonthe word bound even invokes the image of a
shackled slave. The narrator's residence and study at the college
become a kind of imprisonment to which both Norton and the narrator
are blind.
Norton's act of generosity to Trueblood contains the same
tensions between kindness and self-interest. He takes a distinct
voyeuristic delight in Trueblood's story, seeming to derive from
it both entertainment and the thrill of forbidden pleasure. Indeed,
Norton's detailed descriptions of his own daughter suggest that
Trueblood's story may provide him with an imaginative outlet in
which he vicariously can live out his own incestuous desires. Norton,
who continually mentions his daughter's beauty and purity, at one
point remarks, I could never believe her to be my own flesh and
blood. The one hundred dollars that Norton gives Trueblood, then,
seems a payment for describing the very sin that Norton himself
seems to have wanted to commit. Although he claims that he intends
the money for Trueblood's children, the gift seems tainted, like Norton's
gifts to the college, by illegitimate motives, and serves to degrade
rather than to help the recipient.
When the doctor-veteran at the Golden Day tavern calls
the narrator an automaton, the comment revives the problematic
relationship between white benefactor and black beneficiary. The veteran
explicitly identifies Norton's narcissism by stating that Norton
sees the narrator as a mark on the scorecard of his achievement.
Poor stumblers, he says, neither of you can see the other. . .
. But neither Norton nor the narrator takes kindly to having his figurative
blindfold removed: just as Norton wishes to believe himself an influential
humanitarian, so does the narrator wish to continue under the illusion
that the college offers him the freedom to determine his own fate
and identity. Ellison imbues this scene with an extremely ironic
social critique: though the veteran emerges as the only character
to recognize and speak the truth, society labels him insane for
daring to see beneath the surface and for telling the tale of what
he has seen.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|