Analysis: Chapters 10–13
In this section, Dickens develops the love triangle among
Lucie, Carton, and Darnay. Rather than simply writing an encyclopedic account
of the French Revolution, Dickens balances history with the more
private struggles of his principal characters. He links the two
sides of his novel thematically, as each raises questions about the
possibilities of revolution and resurrectionCarton, for example,
like France itself, strikes out for a new life.
It is in Chapter 13 that Dickens
lays the foundation for Carton's eventual turnaround. Upon seeing
Carton, Lucie observes a change in his demeanor. Much of this change
owes to Carton's feelings for her. Just as Carton shares Darnay's
physical countenance, he also shares Darnay's devotion to Lucie.
Yet Carton's confession strikes the reader as more touching and
profound than that of his counterpart. The reader certainly believes
Darnay as he informs Manette, Dear Doctor Manette, I
love your daughter fondly, dearly, disinterestedly, devotedly. If
ever there were love in the world, I love her, but this declaration,
while direct, seems rather vapid and unimaginative. The alliteration
of dearly, disinterestedly, devotedly highlights the flatalmost
boredtone of the declaration as it slogs through its sequence of
adverbs. The closing sentence seems almost a parody of Romantic
love poetry. Darnay touts his love as a great force of the universe
but does so with the most mundane possible phrasing, and the repetition
of the word love is dogged and uninspired.
Carton's words, on the other hand, betray a
deep psychological and emotional struggle, suggesting the existence
of feelings more complex, perhaps even more worthy of reciprocation,
than Darnay's:
In my degradation I have not been so degraded
but that the sight of you with your father, and of this home made
such a home by you, has stirred old shadows that I thought had died out
of me. . . . I have had unformed ideas of striving afresh, beginning
anew, shaking off sloth and sensuality, and fighting out the abandoned
fight.
In his depiction of his love, Carton opens himself to
the reader's sympathy in a way that Darnay does not. Whereas Darnay
makes an objective, almost factual statement of his love for Lucie,
Carton describes his emotions, tinged as they are by realistic insecurity (my
degradation) and uncertainty (unformed ideas). He also speaks
poetically of old shadows and the abandoned fight; his use of
metaphor seems to reflect his inability to grasp fully his profound
feelings. Darnay, in contrast, categorizes his experience simply
as love, not pausing to ponder the emotions behind the word.
Lucie's conjecture on whether she can recall [Carton]
. . . to a better course echoes the beginning of the novel, when
Lorry recalls Doctor Manette to life. Manette had to suffer a death
of sortswasting nearly twenty years in prisonbefore being reborn
into the life of love and devotion with Lucie. Now, Carton, too,
shall have to undergo a sort of death or sacrifice in order to win
the fight for love and meaning that he claims to have abandoned.
Dickens's characteristic humor, largely absent from A
Tale of Two Cities, shines through in his depiction of
Stryver in Chapter 12. Dickens uses Stryver's
name to suggest the essential nature of his character. Coldly ambitious,
the man ruthlessly strives to distinguish himself as a great businessman
and here, in Chapter 12, endeavors to win
the hand of Lucie Manette. Dickens ironically entitles the chapter
The Fellow of Delicacy, bringing Stryver's coarseness into greater
relief. In Stryver's surly refusal to heed Lorry's gentle advice
and postpone his courtship of Lucie, we see clearly one of Dickens's
greatest talentsthe ability to capture a character through dialogue.
Were you going there [to Lucie's] now?
asked Mr. Lorry.
Straight! said Stryver,
with a plump of his fist on the desk.
Then
I think I wouldn't, if I was you.
Why?
said Stryver. Now, I'll put you in a corner, forensically shaking
a forefinger at him. You are a man of business and bound to have
a reason. State your reason. Why wouldn't you go?
The directness of Stryver's response to Lorry (Straight!)
and the emphatic nature of his accompanying thump on the table demonstrate
his blind and unshakeable ambition. His finger-wagging and blustery
imperative demanding to hear Lorry's reason reveal his aggressive
nature and refusal to be hindered in his pursuits. In his interrogating
and intimidating mannerisms, Stryver acts as if he were arguing
a legal point or cross-examining a witness. It is clear to the reader
that he approaches the courtship as he would a case in courtas
a way to gain money and statureand not out of fondness for Lucie.