Analysis
Augustine titled his deeply philosophical and theological autobiography
Confessions to implicate two aspects of the form the work would take.
To
confess, in Augustine's time, meant both to give an account of one's faults
to God and to
praise God (to speak one's love for God). These two aims come together in
the
Confessions in an elegant but complex sense: Augustine narrates his
ascent from
sinfulness to faithfulness not simply for the practical edification of his
readers, but also
because he believes that narrative to be itself a story of God's greatness
and of the
fundamental love all things have for Him. Thus, in the Confessions
form equals
content to a large degreethe natural form for Augustine's story of
redemption to take
would be a direct address to God, since it is God who must be thanked for
such
redemption. (That said, a direct address to God was a highly original form
for Augustine
to have used at the time).
This idea should also help us understand the apparently lopsided and unusual
structure of
the text. The first nine Books of the Confessions are devoted to the
story of
Augustine's life up to his mother's death, but the last four Books make a
sudden, lengthy
departure into pure theology and philosophy. This shift should be
understood in the same
context as the double meaning of 'confessions'for Augustine, the story of
his sinful life
and redemption is in fact a profoundly philosophical and religious matter,
since his story
is only one example of the way all imperfect creation yearns to return to
God. Thus, the
story of the return to God is set out first as an autobiography, and then in
conceptual
terms.
This idea of the return also serves as a good access to the philosophical
and theological
context in which Augustine is thinking and writing. The most important
influence here
(besides the Bible) is Neoplatonism, a few major texts of which Augustine
read shortly
before his conversion. The Neoplatonist universe is hierarchical, but
things lower on the
scale of being cannot be said to be bad or evil. Everything is good in so
far as it exists,
but things lower on the scale have a less complete and perfect Being. In
contrast to God,
who is eternal, unchanging, and unified, the lower levels of being involve
what we know
as the visible universea universe of matter in constant flux, in a vast
multiplicity, and
caught up in the ravages of time.
Augustine's lasting influence lies largely in his success in combining this
Neoplatonic
worldview with the Christian one. In Augustine's hybrid system, the idea
that all
creation is good in as much as it exists means that all creation, no matter
how nasty or
ugly, has its existence only in God. Because of this, all creation seeks to
return to God,
who is the purest and most perfected form of the compromised Being enjoyed
by
individual things. Again, then, any story of an individual's return to God
is also a
statement about the relationship between God and the created universe:
namely,
everything tends back toward God, its constant source and ideal form.
A question to which much of the last four Books of the Confessions is
devoted is
how this relationship between an eternal God and a temporal creation could
exist. How
could the return to God be a process that takes place over time, if God is
an eternal
essence to which we already owe our very existence? How did God create the
world (and
'when' could this have happened) if God is eternal and unchanging? The
solution, for
Augustine, involves a deep understanding of the simultaneity of eternity and
time. Time,
he argues, does not really existit is more of an illusion we generate for
ourselves for
unclear reasons (fundamentally, we fall into time because of our distance
from God's
perfection). Past and future exist only in our present constructions of
them. From God's
point of view, all of time exists at once--nothing comes 'before' or 'after'
anything else
temporally. God created the universe not 'at' a specific time, but rather
creates it
constantly and always, in one eternal act.
This idea puts the both the Neoplatonic worldview and Augustine's own act of
'confessing' in a new perspective. There no longer needs to be any conflict
between the
idea of a return to God over 'time' (as with the young and sinful Augustine)
on the one
hand and everything's constant existence in God on the other. Since time is
simply an
illusion of the lower hierarchy, it means the same thing to wander and
return to God as it
does to owe one's existence to God at every momentthese are just two
aspects of the
same thing, one aspect told as a story and the other told in religious and
philosophical
terms.
Thus, again, Augustine's text is remarkably and complexly coherent, despite
its apparent
eccentricities and shifts in content. He is laying out the story of his
life, opening himself
as completely as possible to God and to his readers. In so doing, he is
praising God for
his salvation. Further, he is illustrating, with a temporal example, a
specific view of the
universe as unified across all time in an unchanging God.
We have left Christ out of this discussion, largely because the most
challenging aspects
of Augustine's thought often concern his use of the Neoplatonic system.
Nonetheless,
Christ is crucial to Augustine, although he has no place in Neoplatonism.
Christ is the
mechanism by which the return to God is effected. It is through Christ that
a human can
come to know his or her existence in God, since Christ is God made human.
Augustine
suggests that Christ is also wisdom itself, since wisdom too is a kind of
intermediary
between God and the lower levels of creation. It is in this wisdom, in the
context of this
'Christ,' that God created the universe, and it is through this wisdom,
Christ, that the
universe can return to Him.