Skip over navigation

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

David Hume

How to Cite This SparkNote

Suggestions for Further Reading

Full Bibliographic Citation

MLA

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. Web. 13 Dec. 2014.

The Chicago Manual of Style

SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.” SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/dialogues/ (accessed December 13, 2014).

APA

SparkNotes Editors. (n.d.). SparkNote on Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Retrieved December 13, 2014, from http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/dialogues/

In Text Citation

MLA

“Their conversation is awkward, especially when she mentions Wickham, a subject Darcy clearly wishes to avoid” (SparkNotes Editors).

APA

“Their conversation is awkward, especially when she mentions Wickham, a subject Darcy clearly wishes to avoid” (SparkNotes Editors, n.d.).

Footnote

The Chicago Manual of Style

Chicago requires the use of footnotes, rather than parenthetical citations, in conjunction with a list of works cited when dealing with literature.

1 SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.” SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/dialogues/ (accessed December 13, 2014).


Please be sure to cite your sources. For more information about what plagiarism is and how to avoid it, please read our article on The Plagiarism Plague. If you have any questions regarding how to use or include references to SparkNotes in your work, please tell us.

More Help

Previous Next
Whomever wrote this may very well be Kantian but...

by Bobarooney, May 29, 2014

This chapter is about the Cosmological argument for God's existence, not the Ontological. Of course, Ontological arguments get their name from the term 'ontos' meaning existence, yet it is missleading and potentially detrimental that this is written as though it is about the ontological argument. I've not read the whole thing, though at a glance it is quite obviously mistaken. In short, whomever wrote this cannot have read the 11 paragraphs of Section IX in the DNR.

In truth, the first part of Demea's argument runs closely with Dr Sam... Read more

0 Comments

3 out of 3 people found this helpful

Follow Us