|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home : Other Subjects : Psychology Study Guides : Personality : Introduction : Theoretical Approaches to Personality
Theoretical Approaches to Personality
There are a variety of ways of thinking about
personality. The most prominent current
approaches are the trait or temperament
approaches, which usually have a strong biological
component, and the motivational approaches, which
follow in the footsteps of behavioristic and
social cognitive approaches. The other
approaches discussed in this SparkNote--the
psychodynamic and
humanistic-existential
approaches--are not widely practiced today, but
have strongly influenced the history of the field
and the kinds of questions that are now being
asked. Each of these approaches is briefly
summarized below; more detailed descriptions can be
found in each Topic.
Psychodynamic
The paradigm example of a psychodynamic approach to
personality is the approach that started the whole
modern field:
psychoanalysis. Sigmund Freud, a Viennese neurologist,
devised his system of psychology from clinical
interviews with his patients, most of whom were
women diagnosed with hysteria. He focused on basic
instincts, specifically the sexual and aggressive
drives, and the
id,
ego, and
superego,
mental structures that he believed interacted to
produce human behavior. Freud influenced a great
deal of later research on personality. Some of his
basic assumptions--that our behavior is mostly
determined by the unconscious, that early life
events are important determinants of life-long
behavior, and that humans are naturally violent and
selfish--continue to undergird some modern theories
of personality. Another important personality
researcher in the psychodynamic tradition is Erik
Erikson, who focused on the social drives that
influence behavior over the life-span.
Humanistic and existential
The humanistic and existential approaches came into
being in the 1950s and 1960s, and have mostly faded
since. They are important, however, because they
represented a break from the dominant paradigms of
the time: psychoanalysis and behaviorism (see below). Instead
of focusing on the unconscious, unpleasant
determinants of behavior postulated by
psychoanalysis, or the environmental factors
emphasized by behaviorism, humanistic and
existential personality researchers focused on
human tendencies towards self-improvement, self-
actualization,
and autonomy. Important humanistic theorists
include ##Abraham Maslow and Carl
Rogers#{psychology/personality/humanistic/section2}
#. One of the more influential existential
theorists was Rollo May.
Behaviorist and social cognitive
Behaviorism was one of the dominant approaches
to psychology in America for the middle half of the
twentieth century. Although it was largely based
on animal behavior, and tended to focus on basic
behaviors, it was also extended to deal with human
personality. Behaviorists like B. F. Skinner
argued that human behavior is determined by
learned environmental contingencies of reward and
punishment, not by internal structures such as the
"self" or the
id,
ego, and
instincts described by
psychoanalysis. Later researchers such as Albert Bandura
rejected the radical behaviorist claim that
internal structures were irrelevant, but they
maintained behaviorism's emphasis on behavior and
environmentally-influenced learning.
Trait and biological
Trait theory is a relatively unified set of
postulates about the main dimensions along
which human personalities differ. Trait theory got
its start in the work of Gordon Allport
and others in the 1940s and 1950s, who used a
statistical technique called factor
analysis to
determine the minimum number of independent
factors--groups of descriptive words--that could
capture most of the variance in the ways people
describe each other and themselves. Current trait
theory postulates that there are approximately five
such groups of descriptors: "openness,"
"conscientiousness,"
"extroversion,"
"agreeableness," and
"neuroticism,"
with extroversion and neuroticism being the most
important, accounting for the majority of the
variance. Trait theorists often assume that such
traits have biological components, but they are
rarely specific about what such components
might consist of. Jerome Kagan has offered a
description of
temperaments that
complements the trait theoretic approach and is
explicitly based on inherited biological
differences.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||