|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
In the other Topics, we have discussed a variety of
approaches to personality, each of which starts
from a particular theoretical framework--such as
the importance of instincts and early life
experience in Freudian
theory--and
then goes on to investigate how people
differ within that framework. In this section, we
consider an approach that started very
differently. Trait theory, unlike the rest of the
theories we discuss, is almost completely
"atheoretic"; that is, it is based on
empirical studies of the ways people
describe themselves and their own behavior, and
makes few or no claims about the underlying
processes that might lead to such behaviors and
self-descriptions.
How could one go about creating an atheoretic
approach to personality? The early trait
theorists, like Raymond Cattell and Hans Eysenck,
did it by going to the dictionary. After culling
from it a large set of words that could be used to
describe someone's personality, they then asked
large numbers of people to fill out questionnaires
indicating the extent to which they, or other
people, could be described with each of those
words. Using a statistical method called factor
analysis, they then tried to determine whether
there were clusters of words that tended to hang
together. An example of a group of words that
hang together is "happy," "glad," and "joyful":
anyone who can be described with one of these words
can probably also be described with the other two.
In the first section, we summarize the models that
Cattell and Eysenck came up with to describe the
results of their factor analyses. In brief,
Cattell believed that there were sixteen important
factors--for example, "sociable-unsociable" or
"shrewd-naive." Eysenck came up with a much
simpler model, one that included only two basic
traits: "extroversion-introversion" and
"neuroticism-stability." Note that both Cattell's and Eysenck's traits
describe dimensions along which personality can vary, a personality continuum
rather than particular personality types. In this section we also
describe the currently accepted set of basic
traits, often known as the "Big Five": openness,
conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
In the second section, we examine one of trait
theory's assumptions: that traits are heavily
influenced by biology. First we discuss evidence
in the field of behavioral genetics derived from
studies of adopted children and twins reared in
different families. This evidence suggests that
many aspects of personality are highly heritable
and that the environment may not play as large a
role as we think. Second, we discuss Jerome
Kagan's theory of temperament, particularly his
studies of inhibited children, and the differences
and similarities between his approach and the
approach of trait theorists.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||