|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis of Major Characters
Richard III
Richard is in every way the dominant character of the
play that bears his name, to the extent that he is both the protagonist
of the story and its major villain. Richard III is
an intense exploration of the psychology of evil, and that exploration
is centered on Richard’s mind. Critics sometimes compare Richard
to the medieval character, Vice, who was a flat and one-sided embodiment
of evil. However, especially in the later scenes of the play, Richard
proves to be highly self-reflective and complicated—making his heinous
acts all the more chilling.
Perhaps more than in any other play by Shakespeare, the
audience of Richard III experiences a complex,
ambiguous, and highly changeable relationship with the main character.
Richard is clearly a villain—he declares outright in his very first
speech that he intends to stop at nothing to achieve his nefarious
designs. But despite his open allegiance to evil, he is such a charismatic
and fascinating figure that, for much of the play, we are likely
to sympathize with him, or at least to be impressed with him. In
this way, our relationship with Richard mimics the other characters’
relationships with him, conveying a powerful sense of the force
of his personality. Even characters such as Lady Anne, who have
an explicit knowledge of his wickedness, allow themselves to be
seduced by his brilliant wordplay, his skillful argumentation, and
his relentless pursuit of his selfish desires.
Richard’s long, fascinating monologues, in which he outlines
his plans and gleefully confesses all his evil thoughts, are central
to the audience’s experience of Richard. Shakespeare uses these
monologues brilliantly to control the audience’s impression of Richard, enabling
this manipulative protagonist to work his charms on the audience.
In Act I, scene i, for example, Richard dolefully claims that his
malice toward others stems from the fact that he is unloved, and
that he is unloved because of his physical deformity. This claim, which
casts the other characters of the play as villains for punishing Richard
for his appearance, makes it easy to sympathize with Richard during
the first scenes of the play.
It quickly becomes apparent, however, that Richard simply
uses his deformity as a tool to gain the sympathy of others—including
us. Richard’s evil is a much more innate part of his character than
simple bitterness about his ugly body. But he uses this speech to
win our trust, and he repeats this ploy throughout his struggle
to be crowned king. After he is crowned king and Richmond
begins his uprising, Richard’s monologues end. Once Richard stops
exerting his charisma on the audience, his real nature becomes much
more apparent, and by the end of the play he can be seen for the
monster that he is. The Princes
The most famous crime of the historical Richard III, and
the deed for which he was most demonized in the century following
his death, is his murder of the two young princes in the Tower of
London. For centuries after the death of Edward IV, the fate of
the princes was a mystery—all that was known was that they had disappeared.
It was speculated that Richard had them killed, it was speculated
that they had spent their entire lives as prisoners in the tower, and
it was speculated that they had escaped and lived abroad. The English
author Sir Thomas More wrote that they were killed and buried at
the foot of a staircase in the White Tower. Many years later, in 1674,
workers in the Tower of London discovered two tiny skeletons hidden
in a chest buried beneath a staircase of the tower. The skeletons
date from approximately the late fifteenth century, and serve as
the best evidence that the young sons of Edward IV were in fact
murdered in the tower. There is still no conclusive proof
that it was Richard who had them murdered—some scholars even think
it could have been Richmond. Still, thanks to popular legend, Shakespeare’s
play, and the biography of Richard that More wrote a few years before
the play, Richard has gone down in history as the most likely culprit.
Because the story of the princes in the tower was so
well known, it was crucial to Richard III that
Shakespeare make the princes memorable and engaging figures despite
their youth and their relatively small roles in the story. As a
result, Shakespeare creates princes who are highly intelligent—they
are among the only characters in the play to see through Richard’s
scheme entirely. They are courageous, standing up fearlessly to
the powerful Richard. They are charismatic, outdoing Richard in
games of wordplay. However, they are utterly, pitifully helpless
because they are so young. Though Elizabeth remarks that her younger
son is a “parlous boy,” meaning sharp or mischievous, the princes
are never a threat to Richard, and they are unable to defend themselves
against him (II.iv.35). Yet Shakespeare creates
the sense that, had the princes lived, they would have grown up
to become more than a match for their wicked uncle. Margaret
Though she plays a very minor role in the play’s plot,
mostly prowling around the castle cursing to herself, Margaret is
nevertheless one of the most important and memorable characters
in Richard III. The impotent, overpowering rage
that she directs at Richard and his family stands for the helpless,
righteous anger of all Richard’s victims. The curses she levels
at the royals in Act I, which are among the most startling and memorable
in all of Shakespeare, foreshadow and essentially determine future
events of the play. Her lesson to Elizabeth and the duchess about
how to curse paints a striking picture of the psychology of victimization
and the use of language as a means of alleviating anguish.
As the wife of the dead and vanquished King Henry VI,
Margaret also represents the plight of women under the patriarchal
power structure of Renaissance England. Without a husband to grant
her status and security, she is reduced to depending on the charity
of her family’s murderers to survive—a dire situation that she later
wishes on Elizabeth. Margaret is a one-dimensional character, representing rage
and pain, but she is vital to the play for the sheer focus of torment
she brings to the world surrounding Richard’s irresistible evil.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||