|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home : History & Biography : Biography Study Guides : Sigmund Freud : International Prominence: 1919–1920
International Prominence: 1919–1920
In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, which
ended in November of 1919, Freud and his family suffered, as did
most Viennese, from the total collapse of the Austrian economy.
Inflation not only meant that buckets of Austrian currency were
needed to buy daily goods, but that Freud's savings and life insurance
plan, the only supports for his wife and aging sisters should something happen
to Freud himself, were rendered worthless almost overnight. Freud
was thus forced to dedicate as much of his time as possible to treating
patients, preferably non-Austrian patients who could pay in foreign
currencies. Freud treated a number of Eastern European patients
during this time, as well as American would-be psychoanalysts who
happily paid to be analyzed by the father of psychoanalysis himself.
Freud made enough money to keep himself and his family comfortable,
but it meant maintaining a brutal schedule of therapy sessions,
sometimes up to ten or twelve fifty-five minute sessions a day.
In October of 1919, almost a year after the end of the
war, Freud was finally promoted from assistant to full professor
at the University of Vienna. The promotion meant almost nothing,
practically speaking. It came with no obligations, no additional
income, and just a few new privileges. Still, the position was
prestigious. In his letters from the time, Freud happily mentions
that after the promotion, people who had previously ignored or
scorned him finally began to talk to him with a certain amount
of respect. In July of 1919, Freud went on his first real vacation
in five years. During the war, he had been unable to travel to
his usual vacation spots in the mountains. Now, while Martha recovered
from an attack of pneumonia in a sanatorium in Salzburg, Freud
and Martha's sister Minna traveled to the Austrian spa town of Bad
Gastein to escape the summer heat.
Despite Freud's new position as a well-respected, if not
world famous, psychologist, the middle years of the 1920s were
not pleasant ones. Freud's daughter Sophie had died of influenza
in 1920. Her son, Heinz, who had been Freud's favorite grandchild,
died of tuberculosis in June of 1923. Freud took the death of Heinz
particularly hard. He seems to have invested much of his hope for
the future in his grandson, and Heinz's death was a crushing blow.
Josef Breuer, a man from whom Freud had been estranged for many
years but whom he still respected, died in June of 1925.
During these years, the Committee, Freud's secret band
of supporters, was also dying, both literally and figuratively.
In 1925, Karl Abraham died from a mysterious illness that had left
him coughing and weak for the last year of his life. Ernest Jones,
in his biography of Freud, guesses that Abraham died of undiagnosed
lung cancer. Two years earlier, in 1923, the Committee had been
weakened by a bitter dispute between two of its members, Jones
and Otto Rank, over the running of the Internationaler
Psychoanalytischer Verlag. Furthermore, in 1923, Rank
had published a book, called The Trauma of Birth, in
which he argued that the birth trauma (the pain of emerging from
the womb) was the root cause of all neuroses. Claiming that the
birth trauma contributed to neuroses was not radical,
but Rank went further, claiming that the Oedipal crisis, which
Freud said caused all neuroses, was essentially irrelevant.
Rank also began to claim that acting out in the psychotherapeutic
session was as or more important as talking through, the traditional
method of psychoanalytic treatment. This meant that Rank's patients
not only talked about, but actually acted out, their infantile traumas.
Combined with Rank's emphasis on the birth trauma, this often meant
that they pretended to emerge from the womb while Rank played the
role of mother or father. This was a practice that Freud, regardless
of his friendly feelings toward Rank, could not accept. The conflict
was made even worse when, in 1924, Rank traveled to the United States
to give a series of lectures on psychoanalysis. There, he claimed
that his particular brand of psychoanalysis, with its focus on
the birth trauma and acting out, was now widely accept in Europe,
even by Freud. Rank's claims were false, since Freud had rejected
Rank's methods in their entirety. After several back-and-forths,
with Rank alternately apologizing to Freud and restating his heretical
claims, Rank broke with Freud definitively in 1925, the year of
Abraham's death. The loss of Rank and Abraham, combined with dissension
among the Committee's other members, led to its dismantling in
May of 1926.
Other problems arose from the explosive popularity of
psychoanalysis in the United States. The International Congresses
of 1925 and 1926 were both controversial. The former Congress was
especially controversial. It took place in Hamburg, Germany, and
was the first Congress attended by a large number of American analysts. There
were many differences between the American and European psychoanalysts,
but the biggest conflict was over lay analysis, i.e. psychoanalysis
performed by analysts who had no medical training. Although Freud
himself was a physician, many European psychoanalysts were not,
including Rank and Hanns Sachs, both members of Freud's inner circle.
In the United States, in contrast, analysts were vehemently opposed
to allowing non-physicians to practice psychoanalysis. Their opposition
was probably motivated in part by the uphill battle for respectability
they were fighting. American analysts worried that unregulated,
non-medical analysts might actually be guilty of all the sins (perversion,
mysticism, etc.) for which psychoanalysis itself had been falsely
criticized. Such analysts would make the battle for respectability
much harder to win. There was no resolution of this difference
at the Congress, and it continued to complicate relations between
European and American analysts for many years to come.
During this time, Freud suffered from a personal illness
that made all of the political and psychoanalytic problems even
more trying. Freud had, for his entire adult life, been a vigorous
and unrepentant cigar smoker. In 1923, undoubtedly as a result
of this habit, a cancerous growth appeared in his mouth on the
inside of his right cheek. Drastic surgery was necessary to prevent
the spread of the cancer. Surgery was performed in two separate
sessions in the beginning of October. Most of Freud's upper right
jaw and hard palate were removed. For the next sixteen years, until
his death in 1938, Freud wore an uncomfortable prosthesis that
resembled a large set of dentures. Talking and eating were both
difficult. Over the course of these sixteen years, thirty-three
different operations were performed to remove cancerous or pre-cancerous
growths in Freud's mouth. He never stopped smoking. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||