|
Reconstruction (1865–1877)
The
End of Reconstruction:
1873–1877
Events
1873
Depression of 1873 hits
Supreme Court hears Slaughterhouse Cases
1874
Democrats become majority party in House of Representatives
1875
Civil Rights Act of 1875 passed
1876
Samuel J. Tilden and Rutherford B. Hayes both claim
victory in presidential election
1877
Congress passes Electoral Count Act
Hayes becomes president
Hayes removes remaining troops from the South
to end Reconstruction
Key People
Rutherford B. Hayes -
Ohio governor chosen to run against Democrat Samuel
J. Tilden in the presidential election of 1876;
received fewer popular and electoral votes than Tilden but became
president after Compromise of 1877
Samuel J. Tilden -
Famous New York prosecutor; ran for president on
Democratic ticket against Rutherford B. Hayes in election of 1876;
fell one electoral vote shy of becoming president
Waning Interest in Reconstruction
As the Depression of 1873 wore
on into the mid-1870s,
northern voters became decreasingly interested in southern Reconstruction. With
unemployment high and hard currency scarce, northerners were more
concerned with their own financial well-being than in securing rights
for freedmen, punishing the Ku Klux Klan, or readmitting secessionist
states. After Democrats capitalized on these depression conditions
and took control of the House of Representatives in 1874,
Reconstruction efforts stalled.
The Civil Rights Act of 1875
The Radical Republicans’ last successful piece of legislation
in Congress was the Civil Rights Act of 1875.
The bill aimed to eliminate social discrimination and forbade discrimination
in all public places, such as theaters, hotels, and restaurants.
The bill stated that blacks should be treated as equals under the
law and that they could sue violators of the law in federal court.
Unfortunately, the act proved ineffective, as Democrats
in the House made sure the bill was unenforceable. The act stated
that blacks had to file claims to defend their own rights; the federal
government could not do it for them. Many blacks were still poor
and worked hard to make a living, and House Democrats knew that lawsuits
would require money and considerable effort.
Democrats Take the South
Meanwhile, Democrats were steadily regaining control of
the South, as the already-weak Republican presence in region only became
weaker as northerners lost interest in Reconstruction. The Depression
of 1873,
along with continued pressure from the Ku Klux Klan,
drove most white Unionists, carpetbaggers, and scalawags out
of the South by the mid-1870s,
leaving blacks alone to fight for radical legislation. Democrats
regained their seats in state legislatures, beginning with majorities
in Virginia and Tennessee in 1869 and
moving steadily onward to other states. Many Democrats used violence
to secure power, and several Republicans were murdered in Mississippi
in the 1875 elections.
Blacks continued to be terrorized and intimidated into not voting.
By 1877,
Democrats had majorities in every southern state.
The Slaughterhouse Cases
The shift of political power in the South was only one
cause of the end of Radical Reconstruction. The other key factor
was a series of sweeping Supreme Court rulings in the 1870s
and 1880s
that weakened radical policy in the years before. The first of these
were the 1873 Slaughterhouse
Cases, so named because they involved a suit against a New
Orleans slaughterhouse. In these cases, the conservative Supreme
Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment protected U.S. citizens
from rights infringements only on a federal level, not on a state
level.
United States v. Cruikshank
Moreover, in 1876,
the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Cruikshank that
only states, not the federal government, could prosecute individuals
under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.
As a result, countless Klan crimes went unpunished by southern state
governments, who tacitly condoned the violence.
The final nail in the coffin was the Civil Rights Cases
of 1883.
In these rulings, the Court further declared the Civil Rights Act
of 1875 unconstitutional,
saying that the Fourteenth Amendment applied only to discrimination
from the government, not from individuals. Collectively, these rulings
from the Supreme Court, along with the Democratic Party’s political
resurgence in the South, brought an end to Radical Reconstruction.
The Election of 1876
In 1876, the Democratic Party,
having already secured a majority in the South, made a concerted
effort to win the White House as well. The party nominated
the famous Grant-era prosecutor Samuel J. Tilden as
their presidential hopeful. After briefly thinking about re-nominating
Ulysses S. Grant for an unprecedented third term, Republicans
instead nominated Ohio Governor Rutherford B. Hayes. Even
though Hayes was a relative unknown, Republicans thought of him
as the perfect candidate: he had been a Union general in the Civil
War, had no controversial opinions, and came from a politically
important state. In the election, Tilden received 184 electoral votes
of the 185 needed to become president. Hayes
only received 165 votes and lost
the popular vote by approximately 250,000 votes.
However, the election results were disputed because of
confusing ballots in South Carolina, Louisiana, and Florida. Under
normal procedure, disputed votes would be recounted in front of
Congress by the president of the Senate. However, the president
of the Senate was a Republican and the Speaker of the House was
a Democrat, so neither man could be trusted to count the votes fairly.
The Compromise of 1877
Congress therefore passed the Electoral Count Act in 1877 to
establish a special committee to recount the votes in a fair and
balanced way. The committee consisted of fifteen men from the House,
Senate, and Supreme Court. The committee concluded by a
margin of one vote that the Republican Hayes had won the disputed
states and therefore was the new president. Democrats were outraged
at first but quickly realized that the situation gave them the perfect
opportunity to strike a bargain with the opposition to
achieve their political goals.
The result was the Compromise of 1877,
in which Democrats agreed to let Hayes become president in exchange
for a complete withdrawal of federal troops from the South. Republicans
agreed, and shortly after Hayes was sworn in as president, he ordered
the remaining federal troops to vacate South Carolina and Louisiana.
Reasons for the End of Reconstruction
Ultimately, Reconstruction ended because of several factors.
Northerners were tired of a decade of Reconstruction efforts and
had become less interested in the South with the rise of speculation
and profit-making in the Gilded Age and then the hardships of the Depression
of 1873.
In addition, the conservative Supreme Court repeatedly struck down
Radical Republican legislation, issuing rulings that had a devastating
effect on blacks’ civil liberties. Meanwhile, the persistent scare
tactics of the Ku Klux Klan and other southern white groups drove
many Republicans out of office, giving Democrats a majority in every
southern state by 1877.
Finally, the Compromise of 1877 and
removal of the remaining federal troops from the South signaled
the end of the Reconstruction era.
The Successes of Reconstruction
Reconstruction was a success in the sense that America,
after 1877, could
once again be called the United States. All of the southern states
had drafted new constitutions; ratified the Thirteenth, Fourteenth,
and Fifteenth Amendments; and pledged loyalty to the Union. Together,
the Civil War and Reconstruction also settled the states’ fights
vs. federalism debate that had been going on since the Virginia
and Kentucky Resolutions of the 1790s
and the Nullification Crisis of the 1830s.
As one historian noted, the United States before the Civil War were a
country, but the United States after the war was a
nation.
The Failures of Reconstruction
However, although Reconstruction was a success in a broad
sense, it was a failure in several specific ways. The swift changes
in political power in the South rendered useless most of the legislation
that Radical Republicans had passed through Congress. Rutherford
B. Hayes’s removal of federal troops from the South in 1877 allowed many
former Confederates and slave owners to regain power, and this return
of power to whites also meant a return to the policy of the old
South. Southern politicians passed the black codes and voter qualifications
and allowed the sharecropping system to thrive—all with the support
of a conservative U.S. Supreme Court, whose key court rulings in
the 1870s
and 1880s
effectively repealed the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and
the Civil Rights Act of 1875.
As a result, by 1877,
northerners were tired of Reconstruction; weary of battling southern
elites, scandal, and radicalism; and had largely lost interest in
supporting black civil rights. Theoretically, North and South reached
a compromise: black civil liberties and racial equality would be
set aside in order to put the Union back together. As it turned
out, blacks would not regain the support of the federal government
until the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|