|
|
◄
PREVIOUS
The Articles of Confederation as Law of the Land
|
NEXT
► The Demise of the Articles of Confederation
|
Building the State (1781-1797)
Settling the West
Summary
Another challenge for the national government under the Articles of
Confederation lay in overseeing the expansion of the United States westward.
Settlers, speculators, and state governments all pressed for expansion into the
wilderness lands granted to the US under the 1783 Treaty of
Paris. The Ordinance of 1785 was the
government's first attempt to control western expansion. It outlined the
protocol for settlement, and established the basic geography of a township as a
parcel of land six miles square. Each township was then divided into
subsections to be occupied by settlers. After two successful years of
settlement, the Northwest Ordinance, passed July 13, 1787, defined the
process of the creation and admission of new states into the union from the area
north of the Ohio River, designated the Northwest Territory. The Northwest
Ordinance forbade slavery in the area as long as it was merely a territory, but
allowed citizens to vote on the legality of slavery upon achieving statehood.
The major obstacles to Western expansion were the interests of foreign nations,
most notably Britain and Spain, and the fact that Native Americans largely
occupied the land to the west. Many political leaders advocated attempting to
integrate the Natives into white American life. However, the Indians were not
eager to give up their culture or their land. In postwar negotiations, many
Indian tribes that had fought against the Continental Army had to accept
treaties that deprived them of much of their land. The Iroquois, Delawares, and
Shawnees, all wartime enemies of the US, were forced to give up nearly all of
their land. However, most Indians rejected the validity of these treaties and
refused to leave their traditional homes.
Mohawk Chief Joseph Brant, the commander of the
most successful of all Indian forces during the Revolutionary
War, led the Indian resistance. In
1786, Brant organized the northwestern Indian tribes into a military alliance to
resist the movement of white settlers into the Northwest Territory. The
alliance faltered because of a lack of support from certain portions of the
Iroquois tribe, but nevertheless, it caused problems for settlers, and was a
major concern for the national government. In the South, Spain and its Indian
allies mobilized to prevent westward expansion by US settlers. The Creek
Indians, under Alexander McGillivray, offered staunch military resistance to the
seizure of Indian homelands, most notably in and around Georgia. Spain, for its
part, restricted American access to the Mississippi River that had been granted
to the US by the Treaty of Paris. Spain had not signed the treaty, and denied
its validity with regard to the Mississippi, which it claimed as its own. In a
move to further discourage westward settlement, the Spanish closed the port of
New Orleans altogether to American commerce in 1784, a fierce blow to the US
economy.
Commentary
The early initiatives of the national government in regard to the settling of
the West were the Confederation's only successful and lasting contributions.
Both the Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance were effective in
outlining the procedures by which the West was settled. Both measures served as
models for later legislation outlining the process of creating and admitting
states throughout the West. However, the Ordinances had very little immediate
effect because of the Indian occupation of the Northwest Territory. The battle
against the Indians for land went back to the seventeenth century and the
original colonists. For as long as North America had been an area of interest
for European powers, the Natives had been harassed and pushed westward, forced
out of their traditional homes. In postwar negotiations, many American leaders
had taken the stance that the Indians were a vanquished people and that their
land, in full, belonged to the United States.
Therefore, it was not surprising that the Indians would have built up such
hatred toward the white settlers, and as a result, provided the major obstacle
to settling the West during the years of the Confederation. Indian resistance
in the northwest stemmed from efforts to maintain control of Native American
homeland and the hope that the British would provide support in the form of arms
and ammunition should the struggle escalate to the point of military action.
During the Revolutionary War the Indians had largely supported the British,
fearing an expansionist independent America. Now as their fears were realized,
they hoped the British would return the favor, and thought that perhaps they
could defeat the forces of the weak and disorganized central government with
British help. However, unable to unify the tribes, and receiving far less
British support than had been hoped for, the Indian tribes, while not totally
defeated and driven out of the Northwest Territory, certainly were not
victorious in their attempts at resistance.
Indian resistance in the South was more successful due to both the leadership of
Alexander McGillivray and the support of the Spanish government. The Spanish
equipped and aided the Indians in their raids of the frontier states that had
occupied Indian land, leading a campaign of terror against those who did not
evacuate the land the Creeks claimed as their own. Moreover, the efforts at
constricting expansion in the South were successful largely because of the
restrictions on trade and travel that the closing of the Mississippi imposed on
settlers in the Mississippi Valley. The Spanish, like the British earlier in the case of the West Indies, saw the weakness of the US national government under the Articles of Confederation as a chance to protect their own interests. They closed the port of New Orleans without fear of facing repercussions from a weak central government unable to control commerce and unsuccessful in attempts to ward off Indian resistance.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
◄
PREVIOUS
The Articles of Confederation as Law of the Land
|
NEXT
► The Demise of the Articles of Confederation
|
|
|