Summary
Finally approved on September 17, 1787, the Constitution laid out the
framework for the new United States government. It reconciled the differences
between the states on the subject of representation, and represented,
ultimately, a balance between the delegates' knowledge that the national
government had to be strengthened and their fear of despotism and tyranny.
Congress was granted the power to lay and collect taxes, to regulate
interstate commerce, and to conduct diplomacy as the single voice of the people
in international affairs. States were thus disallowed to coin money and tax
interstate commerce, and the national government had the power to invoke
military action against the states. The Constitution declared all acts and
treaties made by Congress to be binding on the states.
The Constitution set forth a government composed of 3 branches: the legislative,
executive, and judicial. Each branch was given certain powers over the others
to ensure that no one branch usurped a dangerous amount of power. This system,
known as checks and balances, was the cornerstone of the new framework of
government. The system of checks and balances represented the solution to the
problem of how to empower the central government, yet protect against corruption
and despotism.
The President was granted the power to veto acts of Congress deemed unnecessary
or unjust, and would be responsible for appointing federal and Supreme Court
judges. The Senate had to ratify treaties proposed by the President, and had to
approve the President's cabinet appointments. Congress as a joint body was
given the power to impeach, try, and remove the President from office, as well
as Supreme Court justices, should it become necessary. The judicial branch,
headed by the Supreme Court, had the responsibility and power to interpret the
laws passed by Congress.
The Constitution set forth a form of federalism that balanced the authority of
the state and national governments. The state legislatures would elect the
members of the Senate, as well as select delegates to the Electoral College,
which selected the President. Furthermore, the Constitution could be amended by
a vote in favor of amendment by three-fourths of the state legislatures. The
writers of the Constitution intended to increase the power of the national
government, but they were wary of taking too much power from the states.
One debate that was resolved by the Constitution was that of whether slaves
should be considered persons or property for reasons of representation.
Southern delegates argued that slaves should count toward representative seats,
whereas the representatives of northern states, most of which had already or
would soon abolish slavery, argued that to count slaves as members of the
population would grant an unfair advantage to the southern states. The result
of this debate was the adoption of the Three-fifths Clause, which allowed
three-fifths of all slaves to be counted as people. The Constitution further
forbade any state to refuse to return run-away slaves to the states from which
they came. Under the Constitution, Congress was permitted to ban the
importation of slaves after 1808, but there was no explicit mention of the
framers feelings about the legality of slavery.
Once approved by the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Constitution was
sent to the states for ratification.
Commentary
The Constitution set forth a new national government that completely rejected
the structure of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles had been
founded upon the idea that the United States should be a federation of
individual republics, tied by the confines of geography and the requirements of
defense into a nation. Each state had been given independent authority over its
functions and laws. The Constitution granted powers to the national government
that the period under the Articles of Confederation had proven necessary. For
instance, the Congress under the Articles had been unable to get total
cooperation from the states, and thus had not been able to pass import duties or
taxes necessary to the sustenance of the national budget. As a result, the
Constitution granted Congress the right to levy and collect taxes. The case of
interstate commerce and diplomacy were similar in that the national government
had failed to act decisively in either arena due to restrictions on power, which
were lifted by the Constitution.
The final form of government represented a compromise between those who
advocated power for the states and those who advocated power for the national
government. The Constitution set forth a government far more empowering to the
states than either the Virginia Plan or the New Jersey Plan had
suggested. Undoubtedly, the Constitution established a government system under
which the national government was far superior to that of the state, but the
final result was a republican balance, which acknowledged the need for some
level of state autonomy.
The tripartite format of government laid out by the Constitution was the central
feature of the new government. The three separate branches of the national
government helped to clearly define the major functions of the central
government and enabled the framers to design the system of checks and balances
that would protect the people from the corruption of any one branch of
government. The system of checks and balances has been hailed ever since the
drafting of the Constitution as perhaps the most important contribution of the
founders toward the goal of good government.
Slavery proved a divisive issue for the Constitutional Convention, with some
radicals even calling for its abolition by the Constitution. For reasons of
economics and political tradition, abolition was basically out of the question,
but the framers were forced to deal with issues regarding slavery, such as
representation and fugitive slave laws. However, the Constitution nowhere
clearly states the opinion of the framers on the morality, legality, or future
of slavery. This would prove to be an important admission, as the proponents
and opponents of slavery squared off over the legality of slavery in an ever
increasing zeal that spread through the decades before the civil
war. The very mention of slavery in the
Constitution convinced many that the framers had accepted the institution of
slavery and intended it to be legal. Opponents of slavery claimed that the fact
that the framers had given Congress the power to ban the importation of slaves
after 1808 proved that abolition had been the framers' ultimate goal. The
evidence suggests that the framers, much like their descendents, were split on
the topic of slavery, but that most accepted the institution as a necessary
evil.
Perhaps the most important effect of the drafting of the Constitution was its
reaffirmation of the American people, in the broadest sense, as the ultimate
source of political legitimacy in the nation, responsible for the selection of
their leaders, and shapers of the future of the nation. Additionally, the
framers recognized the need for the Constitution to be a living, evolving
document, which the people would have access to and be able to change as the
need arose.
The SparkNote on the Constitution contains a
great deal more analysis of the constitution and the history out of which it
arose.