|
|
The War of 1812 (1809-1815)
Treaty of Ghent (December 1814)
Summary
From 1812 to 1814, Czar Alexander I
of Russia was
faced the threat of Napoleon's invasion of Russian soil.
Alexander had no idea how much longer Napoleon would last, and was unsure of his
ability to hold out against the French Emperor. As a result, Alexander did not
want Britain distracted, fighting a far-off war against the US. Instead, he
wanted Britain focused on helping him fight Napoleon. The Russians had already defeated Napoleon, however, by the time they
finally convinced Britain and the US to come to the negotiating table in the Belgian city of Ghent in August, 1814.
John Quincy Adams led the US delegation, which also included Henry Clay,
Albert Gallatin, James Bayard, and Jonathan Russell. By 1814, Britain's top
negotiator, the Viscount Castlereagh, was too busy
with the Congress of Vienna to attend negotiations
in Ghent. Less senior diplomats represented Britain.
When the negotiations began, Britain had recently wiped out the American army at
Bladensburg. Hopeful about the prospects of the planned invasion of New York
and angry over continued American privateering that had resulted in the
destruction or theft of massive amounts of British wealth, the British
negotiators demanded advantageous terms: more territory for Canada (including a
large chunk of Maine, which the British army now occupied anyway), control of
the Great Lakes, and the creation of a neutral Indian state to act as a buffer
between the US and Canada. US negotiators refused the terms. The Ghent
negotiations seemed in vain when suddenly the tide began to turn, and the US won
the Battles of Baltimore and Lake Champlain.
With the War now at stalemate, on Christmas Eve in 1814, the Treaty of Ghent
two sides signed the Treat of Ghent. The treaty returned US-British relations to
the status they had had before the war: neither side gained or lost territory.
Issues like the Orders in Council and Impressment were never addressed.
In the eleven articles of the treaty, no mention was made of free trade, and no
mention was made of Sailor's rights. Albert Gallatin, who had been instructed to
secure an end to impressment, wrote back to Madison that Britain's Navy
being what it was, they would never agree to this. The Americans decided the
return of the status quo was enough.
News of the Treaty of Ghent took a while to reach the US. As a result, Andrew
Jackson's men fought the British at New
Orleans unnecessarily, after the treaty had
already been signed.
Commentary
The US delegation to Ghent, comprised of strong, conflicting personalities like
John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay, was bound to be plagued by disagreement and
bickering. Henry Clay could be especially difficult to get along with. He had
once said, "I would rather be right than President." Adams and Clay could hardly
stand each other. Nonetheless, this group had to make peace soon, because
despite the American military successes of September 1814, the war was crushing
the American economy. Businesses throughout the country, especially in New
England, were going bankrupt. Negotiations were not helped by comments in French
newspapers in Ghent that described the British as barbarians for their burning
of Washington.
At the Ghent peace talks, Britain was more willing to negotiate than would
usually be expected; Britain had far bigger problems than the War of 1812 to
worry about. As Britain was busy negotiating a balance of power in Europe at the
Congress of Vienna, Napoleon suddenly escaped from his exile on Elba. Faced
with the sudden prospect of a resurgent, militarist France, Britain wanted to
withdraw its forces from the American entanglement and return them to Europe.
Thus, although Americans proudly believed that their military valor and ability
changed the course of the Ghent negotiations, Britain's decisions regarding the
War of 1812 were as influenced by events in Europe as the outcomes of the
Battles of Baltimore and Lake Champlain.
Although the Treaty of Ghent addressed none of the original grievances that
started the War of 1812, most Americans considered it a success. This just goes
to show how little the War Hawks really cared about these issues: they had
just wanted an excuse to go to war. Having started the war in hopes of
conquering Canada, the US now barely got out without serious damage. Although
celebrated as a victory in the young US, the war really had been a draw, and one
in which Britain had fought with one hand tied behind its back by Napoleon. The
treaty gained none of the initial US goals. Yet in England, many people were
impressed by American scrappiness. Not even Napoleon's Grand Navy had been able
to stand up to the British Navy at
Trafalgar, but
the US had won several naval victories. In some sense, then, stalemate became
victory: no matter the particulars, the US had once again stood toe to toe with
Britain, and survived.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|