|
|
Europe (1848-1871)
The Second Empire in France (1852-1870)
Summary
In December 1848, Louis Napoleon, nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte, was elected
president of the Second Republic. Most political leaders in Paris at the time
considered him a lightweight--easily manipulated, not terribly bright or
competent. Louis surprise the entire nation when, on December 2, 1851, he
seized power in a coup d'etat and became dictator of France. Exactly one year
later, he declared himself Napoleon III and set out to bring France back to its
former glory on the Continent in the Second Empire.
On the surface, France under Napoleon III glittered; in terms of specifics,
France was the symbol of success in many areas. During Napoleon III's reign,
the French economy flourished due to high demand for French goods, a new banking
system put France's financial house in order, and a massive program of public
works turned Paris into the envy of the entire world. The city was completely
redesigned and improved by Baron Georges Haussmann. Haussmann ripped into
poor neighborhoods, replacing them with museums, apartments for the bourgeoisie,
brownstones, architectural wonders, wide and straight boulevards, etcetera.
Paris, previously the most radical and most volatile of European capitals, took
a decidedly more conservative bend--policing was easier, the bourgeoisie pushed
the workers into the surrounding suburbs, and the rich came in droves to the
center.
In foreign policy, Napoleon III had some success and some horrible failures. As
a victor in the Crimean War and a key supporter of Italian unification,
Napoleon III made French foreign policy dominant (for a time) on the Continent.
With Savoy and Nice back under the French fold, Napoleon III could boast an end
to the encirclement imposed upon France after the defeat of his uncle. However,
his involvement in Mexico was a fiasco. In 1861, Napoleon III sent a military
force to that nation to pacify the Mexican countryside, setting up Austrian
archduke Maximilian as emperor of Mexico. France, as Mexico's largest creditor,
had the support of Mexico's conservative elite who opposed the liberal policies
of the previous president in Mexico City. However, Maximilian suffered from a
serious lack of popular support in Mexico; once Napoleon III withdrew his troops
to fight in Europe, Maximilian fell to popular uprising and was executed in the
summer of 1867. French prestige was damaged and public criticism threatened to
bring down Napoleon III's regime.
The proximate cause of the demise of the Second Empire was France's defeat at
the hands of Prussia in the Franco-Prussian War. After Prussia occupied
Paris, Napoleon III fled, and Prussia set up an unstable republican government
based on universal manhood suffrage and multiparty parliamentarianism.
Commentary
To explain the success of the Second Empire, we must see Napoleon III as one
of the first modern politicians, keenly aware of the role of public opinion and
skillful in the management of information and outward appearances. Napoleon III
began his public works project not simply to make Paris a livable place (a
reasonable goal, considering how dirty and crime-ridden Paris had been
beforehand), but also to show his public and the world how successful and
wealthy France had become. He wanted Paris to be the center of world culture
and politics not only because he was fiercely patriotic, but also because the
effect such international prestige would have on his voting public would be
necessary to the maintenance of his regime. Napoleon III mastered the art of
the public appearance and the modern-day "photo-op" before such modern politics
actually took hold in other places (such as the United States).
The rest of France's success, based primarily on the economic boom in Europe at
the time, was not Napoleon III's doing, but we can attribute some credit to him
for maintaining it in France. Years of stable, dictatorial rule in Paris
brought international investment back into France, resulting in a period of
sustained economic growth and a stable period of wages increasing faster than
prices. The rich did get richer, but abject poverty in the cities diminished,
as well. Granted, poverty remained (despite Napoleon III's original promise in
the presidential election of 1848; however, no one could argue against the fact
that the economy was improving and France was doing pretty well.
So, why did France fall so easily? It is too easy to point to the cause usually
cited in textbooks--that Napoleon III's France was a hollow shell. That might
have been true, but so was Austria, so was Russia, so was the Ottoman Empire,
and they took much longer to fall from grace. It is possible that France fell
first because of Prussia's absolute advantage in strength on the Continent; it
was in the wrong place at the wrong time in the face of such a strong enemy.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|