General Summary
Context
Important Terms, People, and Events
Timeline
Post-Roman Europe I: Italy and Southern Gaul From Theodoric to the Lombards (488-600)
Eastern Rome from Marcian to Justin: Doorstep of Byzantium (450-527)
From Eastern Roman Revanche to Byzantium under Siege I: Justinian I (527-565)
From Eastern Roman Revanche to Byzantium under Siege II: Justin II to Heraclius (565-641)
Islamic Expansion and Political Evolution, 632-1000
From Roman Gaul to the Merovingian Kingdom of the Franks (450-511)
Clovis' Sons and Creeping Merovingian Anarchy (511-640)
Charlemagne and the Carolingian State(s) to 843
End of the First European Order: Foreign Invasions, Carolingian Obsolescence, and Doorstep of the High Middle Ages (840s-950s)
Political Arrangements in Europe towards the Second Millennium
Christianity, 325-650s: Conversion, the Papacy, and Monasticism I
Christianity, 650s-950s: Conversion, the Papacy, and Monasticism II
Review Test
Further Reading
|
◄
PREVIOUS
Islamic Expansion and Political Evolution, 632-1000
|
NEXT
► Clovis' Sons and Creeping Merovingian Anarchy (511-640)
|
Early Middle Ages (475-1000)
From Roman Gaul to the Merovingian Kingdom of the Franks
(450-511)
Summary
Around the middle of the third century CE, a certain group
among the many Barbarian tribes began to coalesce into a larger
super-tribe along he east bank of the Upper Rhine River. They
called themselves the Franks, meaning fierce or free. They did
not raid Gaul substantially, since they were not able to develop
any political unity and were led by several kinglets. With the
beginning of the large-scale barbarian invasions of the fourth
century, the Romans found them useful auxiliaries and foederati,
allowing them to settle on the west side of the Rhine. These Franks
that crossed over were called the Salic Franks, and located mostly
to northeastern Belgium. Unlike other Barbarians, they began to
cultivate the area heavily, as they were possessed of a substantial
peasant element. They did not go through a process of Romanization
akin to the Goths', and did not adopt Christianity. In 406, when
Rhadagaesius led the great Barbarian contingent over the Rhine,
the Franks, who were not able to hold them back, stayed where they
were, lacking political unity or a taste for Roman civilization.
In the next fifty years, Gaul withered economically from
its earlier status as a copy of Roman civilization to the south.
After the Huns in the 450s, all the Barbarians settled through hospitalitas left the
areas allotted to them and created kingdoms. Aegidius, the last Roman
(though German) general in Northern Gaul, made himself the political
leader of the area's Romans. Cut off from Italy by Burgundians,
Visigoths, and others, he relied for warriors on indigenous Barbarians:
the Franks. On two occasions he hired a Frankish chieftain named
Childeric to help, once perhaps in a battle with the Visigoths
at Orleans (463). During this period from the 450s to the 480s,
the nature of Frankish activity in Gaul changed: a) different chiefs
raided deeper into the political vacuum of Gaul, at the same time
as they jockeyed with each other for popularity and preeminence
based on an ability to attract armies looking for booty; and b) Frankish
peasants crossed the Rhine in greater numbers, not returning after
raiding, but settling, founding villages. The raids were lucrative,
and certain petty kings were able to get the trappings of royalty.
Childeric was able to build a palace in Tournai, decorated with
stolen treasures. At his death in 481, Frankish domains straddled
the Rhine, pushing into Gaul.
Childeric's son was Chlodovecus, or Clovis. Though his
father's expansion had been unspectacular, he did inherit some
wealth, a supposed lineage going back to Germanic gods, as well
as Frankish warriors' expectations that he would continue his father's
raiding success. The first opportunity came in 486. Aegidus'
son Syagrius was in control of North-central France stretching to
the Visigothic domains, and at the Battle of Soissons, Clovis defeated
him, opening the area to settlement of thousands of Frankish peasants.
This was the demographic basis of Frankish rule. He then spent
the next decade in obscure campaigns eliminating rival Frankish
leaders. Then in 596, he defeated the Alamanni in Eastern-Central
Gaul, expanding his kingdom further.
Sometime between 496 and 507, Clovis converted to Catholic Christianity,
after a brief Arian transition phase. His baptism by the bishop
of Rheims was followed immediately by the conversion of 3000 of
his troops, after which the rest of his people converted. This
meant that while other Germans, including Theodoric's Goths in
control of Italy, were Arian and viewed heretically by the Church, Clovis
could present himself and his kingdom as the only legitimate Catholic
ruler in the region. Gallo-Roman bishops cooperated with the Franks,
and some, like Gregory of Tours, went on to present his conquests,
starting with that of the Alamanni, as stemming from Catholic convictions.
At this point, Clovis began pressuring the Visigoths in southwestern
Gaul, whose leader Alaric II had been exiling Catholic bishops
no longer willing to cooperate with the Arian ruler. Finally, in
507 he moved in force against the Visigoths. Gregory casts him
as saying he could no longer tolerate Arian rule in southern Gaul.
Crossing the Loire, he routed Alaric II's forces at the Battle
of Vouille, sacked Visigothic cities, and forced them to flee to
Spain. It is at this time that Theodoric the Ostrogoth expanded
into Provence. In 508, Clovis went to Tours and assumed the Imperial
Tunic in the form of an honorary consulship bestowed by Eastern
Emperor Anastasia who was showing his disquietude with Theodoric's
rule. Clovis then issued the Salic Laws, the first written code
of Frankish law. Catholic bishops helped in its preparation, and
it gave him the appearance of a proper ruler. By his death in
511, he had created a totally new political unit, Regium Francium.
It included all of Roman Gaul and the old Germanic reservations
with the exception of the Burgundian kingdom. Further, he had
eliminated all other Frankish kingly families, leaving only his
own. His conversion to Catholicism removed a bar to Frankish-Gallo-Roman
intermarriage.
Commentary
It is with the Frankish assumption of dominion in Gaul
that the Dark Ages reached this region. Not all have felt this
way. In the beginnings of the twentieth century, a Belgian socio-economic
historian named Henri Pirenne tried to revise the view that the
Barbarian migrations spelled the doom of the Antique in Europe.
According to him, as the Barbarians came to enjoy Roman society rather
than destroy it, one had to look elsewhere, and later, for the decomposition
of Mediterranean civilization based on long-distance commerce and
high culture. For him, it was the Islamic expansion, which brought
a war-like band of Arabs into domination of the trade routes.
Not at all inclined towards trade, they strangled the Mediterranean
basin, ushering in the impoverished early Middle Ages.
There are several problems with this perspective. First,
everything we know about Islamic commercial relations from the
600s on suggests that they were quite positively predisposed towards
cultivating both internal trade and long- distance, international
commerce. Not only did trade provide them with commodities and funds
they needed in an expanding civilization, it also provided Islamic
rulers with finances in the form of customs revenue. Second, Pirenne,
writing at a time of Western economic dominance over the Middle
East, perhaps forgot that Muhammad himself had been a long-distance
merchant in Arabia and Syria, and that the elites of early Islam
all came from a similar background. We even are indebted to Muslims
for such innovations as the check, as well as risk and profit-sharing
mechanisms permitting the funding of inter-regional trade, called mudaraba in
Arabic and commenda in Latin. These were used
widely in the emerging Italian merchant cities from the tenth century
onwards. Third, more recent historians have shown that where Eastern-origin
commodities did start to disappear from European markets after
the rise of Islam, it was often due to hording by European rulers,
or monopolizing by governments. In other respects, such commodities
had become scarce prior to Islam's emergence.
More directly relevant for us, though, is that the Pirenne
Thesis tempts us to forget the sheer degradation resulting from
the Frankish domination in Gaul, in terms of socio-economic order
and political-legal technology. First, we must remember that the
Franks were the last substantial German tribal group to enter into
Gaul. They were Romanized in only the most superficial way, and
should thus be seen as part of the second Barbarian wave of Germans migrating
only to the Roman provinces directly adjoining their ancestral
areas across the Rhine. Also, the sheer numbers of them that came,
settling the land thickly as peasants and warriors, made it impracticable
for them to shed any aspect of their Germanic identity. Contact
with Ripuarian Franks on the pother side of the Rhine guaranteed
maintenance of Germanic custom, just as it provided an inexhaustable
source of Frankish manpower. This ultimately subdued totally any
remaining aspects of Roman society in northern Gaul, which had
been the least thoroughly integrated in the Roman political and
cultural system to begin with. Even when the Salic Franks came
over the Rhine in the fifth century, they had gone through only
the most rudimentary process of political unification. Clovis
was only one of many petty kinglets vying with each other in the
quest for booty and the warrior retinues that raiding would attract.
Luckily for him, his father had raided sufficiently successfully
to attract growing numbers to Clovis' banner. There was no political
acumen to Clovis' rise, just effective thuggery in the bogs and
forests of Gaul.
All this had ramifications for the nature of the Merovingian
polity unfolding under Clovis and his successors. In short, Roman institutions
were replaced in almost their entirety by their much more primitive
Frankish analogues. In the sphere of trade and commerce, there was no
Frankish analogue. While an Frankish peasants provided an agricultural
base, other commodities found their way into Frankish hands through
requisition, imposition of new duties, or simply by plunder. Indeed,
part of Clovis' success was that he was an open-handed raider,
providing for his friends and protege in the manner of the comitatus from
which the kingdom evolved. Indeed, unlike Roman political culture,
the glue of the Merovingian dominions was the personal tie between
war- leader-cum-king and warrior. This personal bond would evolve
into feudalism in the future.
Fiscally speaking, the Frankish approach was exceedingly
retrogressive. While Clovis did not abolish traditional Roman
land taxes, his Frankish warriors and peasants would not pay, considering
a tax on mere land-use to be subversive. Franks were therefore exempt,
with indigenous Gallo-Romans still having to pay it. As their
population declined, though, so did the revenues. Also, Frankish
kings often gave gifts to local elites, one of which was an exemption
from land taxes, and when there was an urban disturbance, Frankish
leaders would burn tax registers (as well as homes) to gain allies.
As fixed taxes ebbed away, indirect taxes such as tolls remained.
The problem here was ensuring that local royal agents actually
transferred the funds to the palace treasury. Over time, too,
the coinage system declined. In the early sixth century, Franks
stopped minting the Roman bronze coins, preferring gold. With
no small change for daily transactions, a monetary trade system reverted
t commodity barter.
The closest thing to a royal bureaucracy was the King's
camp-turned-house- turned-palace. It was quite basic, similar to
pre-migration chieftains' residences, only now, rulers' trusted
associates bore Roman-sounding titles with marginal resemblance
to actual functions. The treasury was often a huge chest under
the king's bed, for example. Beyond that, royal officers had extremely
tenuous links to the local level, based either on familial bonds
or extortion. Thus, the king's closest warrior associates provided
the rudimentary administration of the kingdom. Based upon the declining
urban units called civitates, counts, or comes, would
be appointed to various regions, based upon their pre-existing
residence there, or participation in its plundering/conquest.
They had three tasks: A) To administer the royal lands. These
were lands which had belonged to the Roman government, and which
Clovis had requisitioned to himself upon conquest. The count was
to collect the indirect duties and send them to the king. Here,
of course, was much room for individual power cultivation. Personal
ties could weaken if the sovereign was not a dominant individual,
and the lack of technology or coercive resources meant that over
time, revenues could remain with the counts. Of course, the mere
fact that kingship in Germanic society was a relativistic, tenuous
institution implied that all counts, given the slightest chance,
would try to increase their powers at the expense of the king and
other counts. B) The count was also to provide a local court for
Frankish law. Called the mallus, it contained
elders as advisers--rachinburgii. The court was
a non-compulsory service for Franks, and rather than impersonal
justice based on precedent, etc., as in Roman times, traditional
Germanic justice was pursued, based on wergeld, blood money,
so as to avoid blood- feuds. Thus, practices such as oath-taking
in order to exonerate oneself-- compurgation--were accompanied by
ordeals of physical suffering for individuals whose character was
deemed less trust-worthy. In time, as more and more of the roman
tradition receded, the indigenous Gallo-Roman population would accept
this kind of justice as well. C) Every spring the count was to
bring his armed retinue to wherever the king was camping out.
After gathering together a retinue-based army, the royal host would
conduct wars incorporating plunder, discipline of wayward notables,
and raiding on the frontiers in hopes of expanding the borders.
In this scheme, there was no concept of continuous policing of
counties by their leaders. Administration of the countryside, or
provision of rural security, was not a concern of either kings or
most counts. As well, there was no relatively regular army on Frankish
frontiers, as there had been in roman times. Aside from campaigns
of conquest, borders were left undefended and thus vulnerable.
Of course, that military organization was localized meant that
aspiring counts, as well as disappointed royal relatives, could usurp
a fair amount of power.
By the mid-seventh century, something kindly referred
to as a fusion of Gallo- Romans and Franks was occurring. Based
on the decay of Roman forms not maintained by a weakened demographic base
and an unconcerned Frankish component, it was evidenced in shared
attitudes to principles of law, kingship, and social bonds. Beyond
this, the Frankish choice of Catholicism from the beginning, as
opposed to heretical Arianism, smoothed the process of growing together.
Borders to intermarriage and common spiritual expression were
removed, though the Christian patina in Gaul remained superficial
at best into the 700s. Still, Merovingians often did patronize
the Church, allowing some entry of culture into early medieval
Western Europe.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
◄
PREVIOUS
Islamic Expansion and Political Evolution, 632-1000
|
NEXT
► Clovis' Sons and Creeping Merovingian Anarchy (511-640)
|
|
|