|
|
The Scientific Revolution (1550-1700)
Biology (1600-1680)
Summary
One of the first to apply the evolving physical philosophy of the Scientific
revolution was a professor of science at Padua, Italy, named Santorio
Santorio. His experiments laid the groundwork for the study of metabolism and
the physical and chemical processes of the human body. Santorio also adapted
the thermometer, invented by Galileo, to clinical purposes. Beginning in
1616, William Harvey, an Englishman who also studied at Padua, was the first
to demonstrate, through dissection, that the circulation of blood through the
human body is continuous. In coming to this conclusion, he broke with the
beliefs of the ancient Greek physician, Galen, who assumed that the blood
consisted of two types, one in the veins and the other in the arteries.
The contributions of Santorio and Harvey, combined with the advances in physics,
gave impetus to the attempt to explain vital workings of the human body on
mechanical grounds. The first book on physiology was written by Rene
Descartes, who set forth a complex model of the animal structure. Many of his
findings were later disproved, but at first his model attracted a significant
following. Descartes also worked to determine the residence of human reason, or
the soul. He claimed that he had discovered this in the pineal gland of the
brain, which he wrongly believed to be unique to humans.
The Italian scholar Giovanni Alfonso Borelli was the foremost thinker of the
era on human mechanics. His 1680 work, On the Motion of Animals, is
widely recognized as the greatest early triumph of the application of mechanics
to the human organism. Borelli, who extended his theories to touch upon the
flight of birds and the swimming of fish, founded the modern study of muscular
motion. Others attempted to explain human functions on the chemical level.
Franciscus Sylvius introduced the idea of chemmical affinity to explain the
human body's use of salts. He and his followers contributed greatly to the
study of digestion and body fluids.
Advances were also made in the physical and chemical study of plants, largely
spawned by Galileo's introduction of the microscope. Marcello Malpighi did
much work with microscopes and conceived an erroneous model of plant circulation
which, though incorrect, inspired further investigation into the subject.
Malpighi also worked extensively with insects, and made significant advances in
that field. Experimental work in the study of plants was done extensively by
Edme Mariotte, who sought to explain sap pressure in plants by describing a
mechanism by which plants permit the entrance but not the exit of liquid.
Commentary
William Harvey's discovery that blood circulates through the human body was an
important first step in the rejection of the physiology assumed by the students
of Galen. The knowledge that the blood circulates was the foundation for an
entire field of science that focuses on the importance of the blood. After
Harvey's discoveries, curiosity quickly flared up regarding the questions of
what exactly was carried by blood, where it was carried to and how dispensed.
The study of the circulatory system has formed the cornerstone of animal biology
since Harvey's time, each generation achieving a more complete understanding of
some aspect or other of the system, or the function of some organ or other which
is touched by it.
The advances made in physics led many biologists to see the human body as a
conglomeration of separate mechanisms, relying on the laws of physics to
function, with joints as fulcrums using the principles of leverage and all body
parts subject to the same laws which governed mechanisms built out of wood or
metal. This emphasis on separating the various functions of the human body into
separate parts often had the negative result of causing biologists to lose sight
of the larger picture of the body in total, which though a physicist might
explain the operation of each of its individual parts, remains something of a
mystery as a complete organism. Similarly, Descartes attempted to discern the
location and properties of the mechanism which produces the human quality of
reason and will. Though the pineal gland has since been proven to be not unique
to humans, and the inhabitants of modern times might scoff at Descartes
presumption, the source of human reason and will remains unknown, and the full
process of translating thoughts into actions is not understood. Descartes'
theory demonstrates the zeal of attempted mechanization of the human body, but
in reality, his hypothesis is no more flawed than many which have been presented
since.
The intensified study of biology during the seventeenth century revived the
spirit of inquiry into nature produced by the
Renaissance and resumed the questioning of the
traditional explanations of the Aristotelian system. Though many of the
claims of the Aristotelian system, especially in regard to animal biology, were
eventually proven correct, many of the ancient truths of biology, both animal
and plant, broke down during the seventeenth century. Chemical studies of the
human body began to break down the medieval belief that the human body was
filled with four substances, or 'humors'--blood, yellow bile, black bile, and
phlegm--which if thrown out of balance caused illness. Edme Mariotte took steps
toward the rejection of the Aristotelian beliefs surrounding plant biology by
questioning the ancient belief in a vegetative soul. Mariotte demonstrated that
every species of plant, and even the parts of a plant, exactly reproduce their
own properties in their offspring. He affirmed that all of the vital processes
of plants were the result of the interplay of physical forces and denounced any
non-mechanical explanation.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|