|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home : English : Literature Study Guides : Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass : Chapter XI: Who Stole the Tarts?
Chapter XI: Who Stole the Tarts?
Summary
Alice arrives in the courtroom and finds the King and
Queen of Hearts on their thrones, surrounded by a large crowd of
animals and the whole deck of cards. The Knave lies chained before
them. Alice surveys the room and takes great pleasure in identifying
the various features of a court of law that she has read about.
Alice notices that all of the jurors are writing down their own
names, which the Gryphon explains that they all must do lest they
forget their names before the trial’s end. Alice calls the jurors
“stupid things,” and the jurors immediately write this down. She
snatches a squeaking pencil out of the hand of the juror Bill, last
seen as the servant of the White Rabbit, and he promptly begins
writing with his finger.
The White Rabbit, serving the court as a herald, reads
the accusation that the Knave of Hearts has stolen the Queen’s tarts.
The Mad Hatter comes forth as the first witness, bearing a teacup
and a piece of bread and butter. The King bids the Hatter remove
his hat, but the Hatter refuses, explaining that he does not own
the hats, he merely sells them. As Alice watches, she finds that
she has started to grow again. The Dormouse becomes upset by Alice’s
growth and storms off to the other side of the court to avoid being
crushed by Alice. The Hatter delivers a bungled testimony, nervously
suggesting that the March Hare said something. Before he can relate
what the March Hare said, the Hare denies that he said something.
The Hatter tries to explain that the Dormouse said something, but
the Dormouse doesn’t reply because he has fallen fast asleep.
A juror asks the Hatter what it was the Dormouse said,
but the Hatter cannot remember. The King insults the Hatter’s stupidity, which
prompts a guinea pig to start cheering. The guinea pig is immediately
“suppressed” by being tied up in a bag and sat on. Once the guinea
pig has been suppressed, the King commands the Hatter to stand down.
The Hatter replies that he can stand no lower, so the King bids
him sit down. Another guinea pig begins cheering and is similarly
suppressed. Finally, the King permits the Hatter to leave, and he
sneaks off before the Queen has time to order one of the officers
to chop off his head.
The King calls the Cook as the next witness. The King
asks her what the tarts are made of, and the Cook replies “Pepper.”
The Dormouse sleepily calls out the word “treacle,” and the courtroom
flies into chaos. Amidst the frenzy, the Cook disappears. The King demands
that the next witness be called, and the White Rabbit calls Alice
to the stand. Analysis
Alice has failed to find meaning in Wonderland but hopes
that she will find logic and order in the trial. She sees the Wonderland
court as a true court of justice, viewing the institution of law
as a refuge of sanity in which an objective and undeniable truth
will prevail. She excitedly identifies the various components of
a court of law, such as the jury box and the jurors. The similarities
of the Wonderland court to an aboveground court reinforce Alice’s
faith in the sanctity of law. Alice takes great pleasure in recognizing
the elements of a courtroom given the degree to which her expectations
and perceptions have been confounded throughout her travels. Alice
desires meaning and order and the trial becomes to the last opportunity
to realize her need for coherence and sanity.
Alice quickly realizes that in a world without meaning,
the search for truth and order can only be a sham. The King repeatedly demands
a verdict but one never materializes. The trial mocks the legal
process. The importance of trivial points supersedes core issues of
right and wrong, innocence and guilt. The absurdity of the legal trial
recalls the ridiculous Caucus Race, in which pointless activity serves
as a means to arrive at conclusions that have nothing to do with
the intended purposes of the institutions. Just as the Caucus Race
has no clear winner, the trial fails to determine the culpability of
the Knave. Several critics have pointed out that the concept of
law itself, rather than the Knave, is on trial in this scene. As
with the Caucus Race, Carroll indicts the legal system in Wonderland
as a way of critiquing the legal system in our own world. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||