|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lines 1008-1250
Summary
Hrothgar hosts a great banquet in honor of Beowulf. He
bestows upon him weapons, armor, treasure, and eight of his finest
horses. He then presents Beowulf’s men with rewards and compensates
the Geats with gold for the Geatish warrior that Grendel killed.
After the gifts have been distributed, the king’s scop
comes forward to sing the saga of Finn, which begins with the Danes
losing a bloody battle to Finn, the king of the Frisians, a neighbor
tribe to the Danes. The Danish leader, Hnaef, is killed in the combat.
Recognizing their defeat, the Danes strike a truce with the Frisians
and agree to live with them separately but under common rule and
equal treatment. Hildeburh, a Danish princess who is married to
Finn, is doubly grieved by the outcome of the battle: she orders
that the corpses of her brother, the Danish leader Hnaef, and her
son, a Frisian warrior, be burned on the same bier. The Danes, homesick
and bitter, pass a long winter with the Frisians. When spring comes,
they rise against their enemies. Finn is then defeated and slain,
and his widow, Hildeburh, is returned to Denmark.
When the scop finishes recounting the saga, Wealhtheow
enters, wearing a gold crown, and praises her children, Hrethric
and Hrothmund. She says that when Hrothgar dies, she is certain
that the children will be treated well by their older cousin,
Hrothulf, until they come of age. She expresses her hope that Beowulf
too will act as a friend to them and offer them protection and guidance.
She presents Beowulf with a torque (a collar or necklace) of gold
and a suit of mail armor, asking again that he guide her sons and
treat them kindly.
That night, the warriors sleep in Heorot, unaware that
a new danger lurks in the darkness outside the hall. Analysis
The bard’s tale of the conflict between the Danes and
the Frisians—the Finnsburg episode, as this poem-within-a-poem is
commonly called—contains some of the most beautiful and resonant
language in Beowulf, utilizing many devices characteristic
of Anglo-Saxon poetry. One such device is deliberate, emphatic understatement,
as in the lines, “Hildeburh had little cause / to credit the Jutes”
(1070–1071), where the point is that, in
fact, she has enormous cause to discredit them. Also prominent is
the use of kennings—compound words that
evoke, poetically and often metaphorically, specific ideas, such
as such as “ring-giver” (1101) for king (a
king being one who rewards his warriors with rings) and “sea-lanes”
(1156) for ocean.
The Finnsburg episode relates loosely to Beowulf’s
central narrative. Although it isn’t relevant to the main plot,
it invokes the idea of vengeance as a component of honor. The story
also highlights a tension in the heroic code by presenting the point
of view of the Danish princess Hildeburh. Married to the Frisian
king but herself a daughter of the Danes, Hildeburh experiences
a divided loyalty. She has a son fighting on one side and a brother
on the other. Like many other women in the Germanic warrior culture
depicted in Beowulf, Hildeburh functions as a “peace-pledge
between nations”—an epithet that the poet later applies to Wealhtheow
(2017). Through marriage, Hildeburh helps
to forge a connection between tribes. Of course, the practice of
using women as peace tools is problematic for the men too. Here
an uncle and a nephew are on opposing sides, even though their Germanic
culture prizes a particularly strong bond between a man and his
sister’s son. In the Finnsburg episode peace proves untenable. Hildeburh
must be taken back to Denmark—the ties between the two groups must
be severed—before the conflict can rest.
The story also gives the reader a sense of the Anglo-Saxon
idea of wyrd, or fate, in which individuals conceive
of themselves as directed by necessity and a heroic code that compels
them to act in certain fixed ways. The strong discussion of fate
in this section is ominous, and the reader quickly gets the sense
that the Danes and Geats are a little too exuberant in their rejoicing
over the defeat of Grendel. The narrator compounds this troubling
feeling by informing us that a reversal of fortune is coming: “how
could they know fate, / the grim shape of things to come” (1233–1234). Beowulf’s plot
often anticipates itself in this manner. It may even seem to us
as though the narrator is giving away the plot and destroying the
suspense. For the Beowulf poet, however, the pull
of fate is so strong that an event that is fated to
happen in the future already has a strong presence. Fate walks among
these characters whether they know it or not.
The narrator’s tendency to project forward to future events
manifests itself as well in his hints that Hrothulf, Hrothgar’s
nephew, will usurp the throne from Hrothgar’s sons. Wealhtheow’s
statement that she is certain of Hrothulf’s goodness creates a moment
of dramatic irony, as the poet is well aware that Hrothulf has evil
in mind. The treachery related in the Finnsburg episode casts a
similarly ominous pall over Wealhtheow’s speech and suggests that treachery
will mark the future just as it has the past. Such continuity is
symbolized in the golden torque that Wealhtheow presents to Beowulf.
The poet’s glance forward to Hygelac’s death while wearing the torque
(which Beowulf will have given him) reinforces how symbols link
the past, present, and future in this culture. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||