Important Quotations Explained
1. The
difference between the peacefulness of interior nature and the wilful
hostilities of mankind was very apparent at this place. In contrast
with the harshness of the act just ended within the tent was the
sight of several horses crossing their necks and rubbing each other
lovingly as they waited in patience to be harnessed for the homeward
journey. Outside the fair, in the valleys and woods, all was quiet.
The sun had recently set, and the west heaven was hung with rosy
cloud, which seemed permanent, yet slowly changed. To watch it was
like looking at some grand feat of stagery from a darkened auditorium.
In presence of this scene after the other there was a natural instinct
to abjure man as the blot on an otherwise kindly universe; till
it was remembered that all terrestrial conditions were intermittent,
and that mankind might some night be innocently sleeping when these
quiet objects were raging loud.
In Chapter I, after selling his wife
and daughter to a sailor for five guineas, Michael Henchard steps
out of the furmity-merchant’s tent and considers the world described
above. Here, Hardy employs his talent for description that serves
to make the physical world of the characters real and accessible,
while carrying a symbolic meaning that resonates with the larger
themes of the work as a whole. First, he evokes beautifully the
natural world of Weydon-Priors: the horses, the surrounding woods,
the “rosy cloud[s]” at sunset. With the patient horses that rub
their necks lovingly and stand as a counterpoint to Henchard’s patently
unloving treatment of his wife, the passage departs from strict
realism and veers toward symbolism. By contrasting the human and
natural worlds in this way and determining that “all terrestrial
conditions were intermittent,” that love and hate, kindness and
cruelty are in constant flux, Hardy effectively sets the stage for
his drama.
2. He
advertised about the town, in long posters of a pink colour, that
games of all sorts would take place here; and set to work a little
battalion of men under his own eye. They erected greasy-poles for
climbing, with smoked hams and local cheeses at the top. They placed
hurdles in rows for jumping over; across the river they laid a slippery
pole, with a live pig of the neighborhood tied at the other end,
to become the property of the man who could walk over and get it.
There were also provided wheelbarrows for racing, donkeys for the
same, a stage for boxing, wrestling, and drawing blood generally;
sacks for jumping in.
Several times throughout the novel,
Hardy evokes details of a kind of life that was becoming extinct
even as he described it. Casterbridge is a town situated between
two times: the age of simple, agricultural England and the epoch
of modern, industrialized England. The drama enacted between Henchard
and Farfrae is, in part, the conflict between tradition and innovation,
between the past and the future. Given enough time, the strongest
traditions will fade as surely as memories of the past. Thus, Hardy
plays the part of the amateur anthropologist, recalling rather fondly
the details of rural living that were eclipsed by the advent of
modern technologies. In Chapter XVI, he colorfully describes the
day of celebration that Henchard plans. It is a world of simple
pleasures—smoked hams and local cheeses—a world in which neighbors
have not yet succumbed to the brutal competitiveness of industrial
capitalism but instead share ownership of livestock. It is essentially
a romantic and nostalgic view of a world that, even during Hardy’s
time, no longer existed. Nevertheless, Hardy cannot resist including
details that confirm his understanding of the brutality of the universe,
as in the cruelty inherent in such pastimes as “boxing, wrestling,
and drawing blood generally.”
3. Character
is Fate, said Novalis, and Farfrae’s character was just the reverse
of Henchard’s, who might not inaptly be described as Faust has been
described—as a vehement gloomy being who had quitted the ways of
vulgar men without light to guide him on a better way.
This passage from Chapter XVII relates
to Farfrae’s enormous business success after Henchard requests that
he leave his employment and stop courting Elizabeth-Jane. The phrase
“Character is Fate,” from Novalis, an eighteenth-century German
novelist and poet, offers us a context for understanding much of
Henchard’s ensuing struggle. Henchard blames much of the suffering
he endures on cruel forces that are bent on human destruction. In
Chapter XVII, however, Hardy reminds the reader that Henchard has
much to do with his own downfall. In the same chapter, we read that
“there was still the same unruly volcanic stuff beneath the rind
of Michael Henchard as when he had sold his wife at Weydon Fair.”
This “volcanic stuff” refers to Henchard’s passionate disposition.
Whatever he feels—be it love, hate, desire, or contempt—he feels
it overpoweringly. The same holds true for his guilt over selling
Susan, which tracks him from Weydon-Priors to Casterbridge, where
it overshadows his life for twenty years. His desire to right these
past wrongs and his conviction that he deserves to suffer for them
account for his suffering as much as any malignant force of the
universe.
4. MICHAEL
HENCHARD’S WILL
That Elizabeth-Jane
Farfrae be not told of my death, or made to grieve on account of
me.
& that I be not bury’d in
consecrated ground.
& that no
sexton be asked to toll the bell.
&
that nobody is wished to see my dead body.
&
that no murners walk behind me at my funeral.
&
that no flours be planted on my grave.
&
that no man remember me.
To this
I put my name.
Michael
Henchard
In his introduction to Modern
Critical Interpretations: Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge, Harold
Bloom cites the above passage, taken from the novel’s final chapter,
as the most powerful and eloquent of all of Hardy’s writing. Indeed,
there is a remarkable power and beauty in the simplicity of these
lines. Henchard’s will is the tragic last statement of a tragic
man whose unremitting doubts regarding his life’s worth not only
lead to his death but also follow him there. From the moment Henchard
sells his wife at the Weydon fair, he feels a keen anxiety over
the value of his name. He pledges a twenty-one-year reprieve from
alcohol and sets himself on a course that delivers him to the most
honored business and social offices of a small country town. Unsatisfied
with this seeming reformation of himself, however, he continues
to let his guilt eat away at him and eventually relinquishes the
name and reputation he has built for himself. His last wish, to
be allowed to die anonymously and to go unremembered, is the ultimate
gesture of a man who craves good repute but doubts his own worth.
5. Her
experience had been of a kind to teach her, rightly or wrongly,
that the doubtful honour of a brief transit through a sorry world
hardly called for effusiveness, even when the path was suddenly
irradiated at some half-way point by daybeams rich as hers. But
her strong sense that neither she nor any human being deserved less
than was given, did not blind her to the fact that there were others
receiving less who had deserved much more. And in being forced to
class herself among the fortunate she did not cease to wonder at the
persistence of the unforeseen, when the one to whom such unbroken
tranquillity had been accorded in the adult stage was she whose
youth had seemed to teach that happiness was but the occasional
episode in a general drama of pain.
These lines make up the final passage
of the novel and provide a thoughtful, balanced summary of its proceedings.
Elizabeth-Jane decides to honor Henchard’s last wishes as best she
can. She does not mourn him or plant flowers on his grave. She does,
however, come close to honoring him inwardly, when she reflects
here on the unfair distribution of happiness, which she considers
the most valuable human currency. Her reflection mitigates Henchard’s
obsession with the worth of his name and reputation, for in the
face of such a “sorry world,” all honor seems “doubtful.” But it
also grants the fallen mayor a quiet, unassuming kind of forgiveness.
She certainly has Henchard in mind when she thinks of the many people
who “deserved much more” out of life. Indeed, given that the world emerges
as “a general drama of pain,” both we and Elizabeth-Jane begin to
understand better Henchard’s disastrous mistakes and missteps. Even
his lie regarding Newson becomes less grievous when we consider
that he meant only to secure a happiness that had, for so many years,
eluded him. In such a bleak world, the course of Henchard’s life
seems not to merit punishment so much as it does pity.