|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Counterparts”
Summary
In a busy law firm, one of the partners, Mr. Alleyne,
angrily orders the secretary to send Farrington to his office. Farrington
is a copy clerk in the firm, responsible for making copies of legal
documents by hand, and he has failed to produce an important document
on time. Mr. Alleyne taunts Farrington and says harshly that if
he does not copy the material by closing time his incompetence will
be reported to the other partner. This meeting angers Farrington,
who mentally makes evening plans to drink with his friends as a
respite. Farrington returns to his desk but is unable to focus on
work. He skirts past the chief clerk to sneak out to the local pub
where he quickly drinks a beer.
Two clients are speaking with the chief clerk when Farrington returns
to the office, making his absence apparent. The clerk asks him to
take a file to Mr. Alleyne, who is also with a client. Farrington realizes
that the needed file is incomplete because he has failed to copy
two letters as requested. Hoping that Mr. Alleyne will not notice,
Farrington delivers the incomplete file and returns to his desk
to work on his project. Again unable to concentrate, Farrington
dreams of hot drinks and crowded pubs, only to realize, with increasing
rage, that completing the task is impossible and that he has no
hope of getting an advance on his paycheck to fund his thirst. Meanwhile,
Mr. Alleyne, having noticed the missing letters, has come to Farrington’s
desk with his client, the jovial Miss Delacour, and started another
abusive critique of Farrington’s work. Farrington claims ignorance
and wittily insults Mr. Alleyne to the amusement of Miss Delacour
and his fellow clerks.
Forced to apologize to Mr. Alleyne, Farrington leaves
work without completing his project and dreading the sure backlash
at the office. More determined than ever to go to the pub, Farrington pawns
his pocket watch for drinking money. At his first stop he meets
his friends Nosey Flynn, O’Halloran, and Paddy Leonard, and tells
them of his shining moment insulting his boss. Another clerk from
the office arrives and joins them, repeating the story. Soon the
men leave the pub, and O’Halloran, Leonard, and Farrington move
on to another place. There Leonard introduces the men to an acrobat
named Weathers, who happily accepts the drinks the other men buy
for him. Farrington becomes irritated at the amount of
money he spends, but the men keep drinking and move to yet another
pub. Weathers meets the men there and Farrington begrudgingly buys
him another drink out of courtesy. Farrington’s frustrations build
as he flirts with an elegant woman sitting nearby who ultimately
ignores his advances. Leonard and O’Halloran then convince Farrington
to arm wrestle with Weathers, who has been boasting about his strength
to the men. After two attempts, Farrington loses.
Filled with rage and humiliation, Farrington travels home
to Shelbourne Road, a lower-middle-class area southeast of the city center.
Entering his dark house, he calls to his wife Ada but is met by one
of his five children, his son Tom. When Tom informs him that Ada
is at church, Farrington orders Tom to light up the house and prepare
dinner for him. He then realizes that the house fire has been left
to burn out, which means his dinner will be long in coming. With
his anger at boiling point, Farrington begins to beat Tom, who plaintively
promises to say a Hail Mary for Farrington if he stops.
Analysis
While many characters in Dubliners desire
something, face obstacles that frustrate them, and ultimately forfeit
their desires in paralysis, Farrington sees everything in the world
as an obstacle to his comfort and never relents in his vitriol.
The tedium of work irritates Farrington first, but so does everything
he encounters in the story. The root of Farrington’s violent and
explosive behavior is the circular experience of routine and repetition
that defines his life. Farrington’s job is based on duplication—he
copies documents for a demanding boss. His job, in other words,
is to produce replications of other things, and the monotony of
this job enrages him. Farrington envisions release from such deadening
activity in the warmth and drink of public houses, but his experiences
there only beget further routine. He repeats the story of the confrontation
with Mr. Alleyne to his friends, who then also repeat it. Following
the “round” tradition in which each person in a group takes turns
buying drinks for all companions present, he continually spends
money and consumes more alcohol. The presence of Weathers, who takes advantage
of this system, makes Farrington realize how such tradition and
repetition literally rob him. His anger mounts throughout the story.
Farrington hurtles forward in the story without pausing
to think about his actions or why he feels such discontent. As a
result, his circular activities become more and more brutal. When
he loses two arm wrestling matches to Weathers, a “mere boy,” he
goes home only to beat his own boy. What begins as mundane copying,
the story hints, spins out of control into a cycle of brutal abuse.
While other characters in the collection acknowledge their routine
lives, struggle, then accept their fate passively, Farrington is
unaware and unrelenting. The title, “Counterparts,” refers to a
copy or duplicate of a legal paper, the stuff of Farrington’s career,
but also to things that are similar or equal to each other. Farrington
lives a life of counterparts, to dangerous ends. His pawning of
his watch may symbolically release him from the shackles of schedules
and time demands, but the frustrations of work only take on new
and more extreme forms at the pub and at home. For Farrington, life
repeats itself: work is like the pub is like home. As “Counterparts”
illustrates, this bleeding between different areas of life inevitably
exists. When maddening routine and repetition form the backbone
of experience, passivity may result, but so too might volatile frustration.
The abuse that other stories in Dubliners allude
to becomes explicit in “Counterparts,” and the consistent emotional
theme of anger underpins every event in the story. Joyce uses adjectives
like heavy, dark, and dirty to
describe Farrington—he is quite literally worn out by frustration
and anger. Not even the desperate servitude and piety of his son
touch him, signaling that spirituality fails to save and
protect. Farrington is unable to realize that his own actions are
far worse than the mocking cruelty of his boss. Joyce refers to
Farrington both by his name and as “the man” throughout the story.
In one sentence he is the familiar character of Farrington that
the reader follows throughout the story, yet in another he is “the
man” on the street, on the train, in an office. Farrington, in a
sense, acts as an exchangeable or general type, both a specific
man and everyman. Joyce’s fluid way of addressing him thus serves
to weave Farrington into the Dublin streetscape and suggest that
his brutality is nothing unusual.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||