Calculus BC: Series


The Integral Test

Suppose we have a function f (x) , defined for all x≥1 , which is positive and decreasing. This function defines a sequence {f (n)} and a series

f (n) = f (1) + f (2) + ...    

Considering the following figure, we see that

f (2)≤ f (x)dx    

since a rectangle with height f (1) and width 1 is contained within the region below the graph of f from 0 to 1 .

Figure %: The Function Contains the Rectangular Regions

Similarly,

f (3)≤ f (x)dx    

and so on. Thus we have

f (1) + f (2) + ... + f (n)≤f (1) + f (x)dx    

But the left side of this inequality is simply the n th partial sum for the series under consideration. If

f (x)dx    

is defined, then the partial sums are bounded, so the series converges.

This logic goes the other way too. As the figure below demonstrates,

f (1)≥ f (x)dx    

and so on.

Figure %: The Rectangular Regions Contain the Function

Thus

f (1) + f (2) + ... + f (n)≥ f (x)dx    

If does not exist, then the integral becomes arbitrarily large for large n , as do the partial sums for the series. Therefore the series f (n) does not converge. We summarize the results of this section in the following statement.

If f is a positive, decreasing function defined for x≥1 , then f (n) converges if and only if the limit

f (x)dx    

exists. If so, denote this limit by L . Then the value to which the sum converges satisfies the following inequality:

L f (n)≤f (1) + L    

Take a Study Break

Green YOUR SCHOOL!

Click here to get involved with dosomething.org!

John Krasinski's BIG MIRACLE

Click to watch the trailer and read exclusive star interviews!

Do you like Anna?

Read Dear Albert... from ANNA's perspective!

BATTLESHIP, the movie

Here's why we're super jazzed about it.

Do energy juices actually work?

Our blogger puts 'em to the test!


The Book

Cover image

Read What You Love, Anywhere You Like

Get Our FREE NOOK Reading Apps