|
|
◄
PREVIOUS
Philosophy of Right, I–II: Abstract Right and Morality
|
|
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Philosophy of Right, III: Ethical Life
Summary
The morality that we see expressed in contracts and exchanges, which
reflect a reciprocal respect between individuals for one another's
rights, is only a particular expression of a wider and deeper dimension
of moral life that Hegel calls ethical life. Ethical life is a system
of norms and mores belonging to a social body, made up of spheres
of social interaction and interdependence in which all individuals
are embedded. Whereas morality turns people away from what is toward
what ought to be, ethical life is merely what is, the set of meanings
and practices that guide people in everyday activities whether they
are aware of it or not. Ethical life is present in the three important
levels of social life. In its most elementary form, it is present
in the family and finds expression in basic emotions such as love
and altruism. In civil society, a sphere of social interaction corresponds
to economic life or the system of needs. Civil society engages
individuals as bearers of Abstract Rights, as owners of property
and bearers of legal rights. In civil society, individuals relate
to one another in universal terms.
While private property as the basis of abstract right
and morality is a positive force in promoting individual freedom,
individualistic material interests, such as the pursuit of economic
gain, could potentially destabilize society. When left unchecked,
these destabilizing forces tend to polarize humanity into rich and
poor. The individualism of private material acquisition also weakens
the expression of the basic social bonds and common culture that
hold society together. Certain institutions must be in place to
prevent the system of private property and the individualist worldview
it sustains from undermining society itself. Government authority,
in addition to providing basic infrastructure and protection from crime,
must both promote and protect society from economic individualism,
ensuring that those without property or work are provided for. Corporate
institutions, such as guilds or labor unions, must be in place not
just to look after the economic needs of workers and tradesmen but
to give them a sense of belonging and connection to the social whole
of which they are a part.
After the family and civil society, the third and highest
moment of ethical life is the institution of the state. The state
is the medium through which individuals come to realize their location
in the ethical life of society, as parts of a greater whole. The
state is an expression of spirit unfolding in history through dialectical
development. Whereas earlier forms of the state were imperfect expressions
of collective spirit, the modern state has evolved as a rational
adaptation to structures of modern life. Given the image of the
universal person and the emergence of the autonomous rights-bearing
individual, the modern state, as the highest form of collective
association, serves to integrate this vision of individual freedom
and autonomy into an appreciation of common social bonds, preventing
these two opposed tendencies from pulling society apart and allowing
freedom and rights to coexist with a full expression of communal
spirit.
Analysis
Philosophy of Right is Hegel's most controversial
work, as many readers have objected to the central role he attributes
to the state in realizing a reconciliation of modern individuality
and freedom with the need for collective belonging. However, Hegel's
model of the rational state, though by no means purely democratic,
does not invest power in authority simply to suppress individuality.
Hegel understands the state in terms that are somewhat unfamiliar
to modern readers, who, in the wake of the totalitarian states that arose
during the twentieth century, tend to be skeptical of theories that
give political institutions the task of solving society's problems. For
Hegel, the state is not just a political and authoritarian entity but
the broadest arena of social relations corresponding to common culture,
or ethical life. It is in the institution of the state, therefore, that
the contradictions of ethical life will reveal and fix themselves. In
modern society, the role of the state is to reconcile the egoistic
and individualizing tendencies of civil society with the need for
common belonging.
Hegel largely adopts Kant's description of the moral,
rational individual but believes that Kant's understanding of individuality
is an expression of a particular historical epoch, namely of the
modern world. Hegel is thus regarded as one of the first philosophers
of modernity and of a particularly modern understanding of history.
If there is a unifying ambition throughout his vast writings, this
ambition lies in his attempt to describe the origins and implications
of this image of the individual and how it relates to the religious,
economic, and political aspects of modern life. Here he shows how
this notion of individuality is rooted in practical life but also
that it has a fundamental tension with the expression of ethical
life.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
◄
PREVIOUS
Philosophy of Right, I–II: Abstract Right and Morality
|
|
|
|