|
|
Søren Kierkegaard
The Sickness Unto Death
Summary
Kierkegaard wrote The Sickness Unto Death under
the pseudonym Anti-Climacus, the same pseudonym under which he
wrote his two most important religious works, The Sickness
Unto Death and Practices in Christianity.
The sickness in the title is despair: despair is the sickness
that everyone has until they die. Anti-Climacus defines despair
primarily as a sickness of the self. He also says that everyone,
whether they know it or not, is in despair. The most basic form
of despair stems from not knowing you are in despair. A slightly
more advanced form comes from a desire not to exist, and the most
complex form of despair manifests in an attempt to escape the despair
of not wanting to exist. All of these varieties of despair are caused
by a tension between the infinite and the finite: Anti-Climacus
claims that, although you will die and are thus finite, you also have
an eternal self, which is infinite. After defining despair, Anti-Climacus
questions whether it is a good or a bad thing. He comes to the conclusion
that it is both. Despair is a type of suffering, so it must be bad.
However, despair is a direct result of self-awareness, and increased
self-awareness actually makes the self stronger. The stronger one's
self, the closer one is to God. Anti-Climacus claims that only a
true Christian can manage to live without despair. A true Christian
is someone who places total faith in his or her relationship with
God.
Anti-Climacus says that despair is sin, and the only way
to escape sin is to put complete faith in God. However, putting
faith in God involves an increase of self-awareness and thus an
increase in despair. We are thus faced with the prospect that the
closer to God one grows, the greater one's despair and the greater
one's sin. Only by growing infinitely close to God can despair finally
be defeated. The concrete sins, such as murder and stealing, arise
from the sin of despair. However, to despair is the worst sin of
all. This sounds like a tautologya circular line of reasoningbut
it is not. Anti-Climacus does not think of sin as something you
do but rather as something you are. All the bad things a sinner
does (stealing, killing, cheating) are not sins themselves: they
are the results of being in sin. To despair over
being in sinin other words, to despair over being in despairmerely
intensifies one's sin. The worst sin of all is to refuse forgiveness
for one's sin: the only way to escape sin is to approach God with
faith that forgiveness will be offered. Of course, approaching God
in the first place intensifies sin. This is part of the paradox
of faith.
Analysis
Much of The Sickness Unto Death hangs
on Kierkegaard's definition of a self. Kierkegaard doesn't use
the term the way you or I might in an everyday conversation. Kierkegaard's self is
not just synonymous with person. A self is, for
Kierkegaard, a set of relations. On the simplest level, a self is
a set of relations between a person and the world around him or
her. A body and a brain constitute a person, but more is required
for a self. The self is defined by external and internal relations.
While the idea of relating to oneself may sound contradictory, it
isn't really. A self relating to oneself is just another way of
describing self-awareness. Think of a person trying to decide whether
to go running or watch TV. This is an internal conflict, and a conflict
is, in essence, a relation. Different aspects of your personality
are conflicting, but the conflict itself is part of what makes up
the self. The will is synonymous with the self. The will binds together
all of one's different aspects into a coherent whole. However, for
Kierkegaard, the inability to make a choice is as much a part of
one's self as the ability to make a choice. The self is the willor,
possibly, the lack of will. The highest and most important level
of relation is not between the self and others, or the self and itself,
but between the self and God.
Everyone has a self, whether they realize it or not, and
having a self causes despair. Kierkegaard's notion of despair is
not synonymous with unhappiness. One can be in despair and not even
know it. Despair doesn't affect a person, it affects
a self. Kierkegaard's self is similar to the common concept of the
soul. Depression and unhappiness affect a person, but despair affects
the self because despair is a spiritual sickness. Nonspiritual peoplethat
is, people who don't know they have a selfsuffer this sickness
even though they aren't aware of it, because being unaware of one's
self is the most basic form of despair. People who despair at not having
a self are more aware of their spiritual aspectas they at least
recognize the possibility of having a selfbut
because they incorrectly believe they don't possess a self, they
too suffer despair. Despairing at not having a self is like worrying
that one doesn't have a coherent identity. The third kind of despair,
despair at being a self, exists in someone who realizes that his
or her identity is no greater than his or her relations, specifically
his or her relationship to God. The closer one comes to realizing
that one's self is actually just one's relation to God, the closer
one comes to escaping despair.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|