SparkNotes: Free Study Guides No Fear Shakespeare: The Bard made easy SparkCharts: Just the facts TestPrep: SAT, ACT, and more 101s: College texts condensed Subject Finder: Browse by subject SparkCollege: Get in! SparkLife: 100% study-free home_bottom home_top BN_link
 
◄ PREVIOUS
Parmenides of Elea
NEXT ►
Empedocles
 
 

Presocratics

 
 

The Eleatics: Zeno of Elea and Melissus of Samos

 

Introduction

 
Parmenides inspired many philosophers to follow in his footsteps. The movement he founded is called the school of Elea, and its members are referred to as the Eleatics. The school of Elea was the first movement to treat pure reason as the sole criterion of truth. Logical consistency and internal theoretic coherence, rather than any sort of observational evidence, guided their entire search for knowledge. The main Eleatic positions were inherited from Parmenides: (1) there is no genesis or corruption; (2) there is no plurality out of unity; (3) there is no change; (4) it is impossible to speak or think of non-being.
 

Zeno of Elea

 
Zeno of Elea was Parmenides' most eminent student and was also probably his lover. He was working at roughly the same time as Anaxagoras and Empedocles, and devoted his career to devising arguments in defense of the doctrine of the Parmenidean Real. In his famous paradoxes he attempted to shows that pluralism (i.e. the idea that there really is a plurality of existing things) runs into even greater absurdities than Parmenides' doctrine. His arguments use the method of reductio ad absurdum, in which he begins with the premise he wants to deny, and then shows that this premise leads to a logical contradiction. Zeno did not view these arguments as paradoxes, since he believed that the premises he was trying to undermine (for instance, the existence of motion) were false. Since we today believe that these premises are true, (i.e. we do believe that there is motion in the world, and we do believe that there is a plurality of existing things) we find his brilliant puzzles slightly disturbing.
 

Melissus of Samos

 
Melissus of Samos was the last of the famous Eleatics, writing around 440 B.C. He argued for Parmenides' claims in his own original way, drawing on the distinction between "is" and "seems" and the metaphysical consequences of the former. If something "is" X, he claimed, then it must be X essentially, and so it can never not be X. So, for instance, if something is hot, and does not just seem hot, then it can never stop being hot. Since nothing retains properties indefinitely and through all circumstances, he argues, nothing really is, except the Parmenidean Real.
 
 
 
Help | Feedback | Make a request | Report an error | Send to a friend

◄ PREVIOUS
Parmenides of Elea
NEXT ►
Empedocles
 
 
 
Presocratics message board
Ask a question or post an answer on the community boards.
 
Writing Help
A blog about grammar, writing, and your papers.
 
Study On Your Way to Class
 
PDF
Download a printable version of this SparkNote.
 
 
 
Can't face the work right now? Waste a few minutes with us.
Life
It's already July
Better get cracking on that summer fling
 
Life
"You look tired"
Translation: "You look absolutely horrible."
 
Books
James pulls the old mom's-voice-playing-on-a-VHS trick
And Dan can't believe Bella falls for it
 
 
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About | Sitemap
©2009 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.