Summary
Historically, the four major forms of ascetic Protestantism have been,
Calvinism, Pietism, Methodism, and the Baptist sects. None of these
churches are completely independent of each other, or even from non-ascetic
churches. Even their strongest dogmatic differences were combined in various
ways, and similar moral
conduct can be found in all four. We see, then, that similar ethical
requirements can
correspond with very different dogmatic foundations. In examining these
religions,
Weber explains that he is interested in "the influence of those psychological
sanctions
which, originating in religious belief and the practice of religion, gave a
direction to
practical conduct and held the individual to it." People were concerned with
abstract
dogmas to a degree that can only be understood when we see how connected these
dogmas were with practical religious interests.
The first religion Weber describes is Calvinism. Calvinism's most distinctive
dogma is the
doctrine of predestination. Calvinists believe that God preordains which people
are saved
and which are damned. Calvinists came to this idea from logical necessity. Men
exist for
the sake of God, and to apply earthly standards of justice to God is meaningless
and
insulting. To question one's fate is similar to an animal complaining it wasn't
born a man.
Humans do not have the power to change God's decrees, and we only know that part
of
humanity is saved, and part damned. In the Calvinist outlook, God becomes "a
transcendental being, beyond the reach of human understanding, who with His
quite
incomprehensible decrees has decided the fate of every individual and regulated
the
tiniest details of the cosmos from eternity."
Weber argues that Calvinism must have had a profound psychological impact, "a
feeling
of unprecedented inner loneliness of the single individual." In what was the
most
important thing in his life, eternal salvation, each person had to follow his
path alone, to meet a
destiny already determined for him. No one could help him, and there was no
salvation
through the Church and the sacraments. This was the logical conclusion of the
gradual
elimination of magic from the world. There were no means at all to attain God's
grace if
God had decided to deny it.
On the one hand, this account shows why the Calvinists rejected all sensual and
emotional elements of culture and religion. Such elements were not a means to
salvation
and they promoted superstition. On the other hand, we see the origins of
today's disillusioned and pessimistic individualism. The Calvinist's
interaction with God was
carried out in spiritual isolation, even though he did belong to a church.
There was social
organization because laboring for impersonal social usefulness was believed to
be
required by God.
This account of Calvinism brings up an important question, however. How could
the
doctrine of predestination have developed in an age when one's afterlife was the
most
important and most certain part of existence? Each believer must have wondered
if he or
she was one of the elect; it must have dominated their thoughts. Calvin was
sure of his
own salvation, and his answer to such concerns was simply to be content with the
knowledge that God has chosen, and trust in Christ. Calvin rejected in
principle the
assumption that people could learn from other's conduct whether they were saved
or
damned--this would be trying to force God's secrets. However, this approach was
impossible for Calvin's followers. It was psychologically necessary that they
have some
means of recognizing people in a state of grace, and two such means emerged.
First, it
was considered an absolute duty to consider oneself to be one of the saved, and
to see
doubts as temptations of evil. Secondly, worldly activity was encouraged as the
best
means of gaining that self-confidence.
Why could worldly activity take on this level of importance? Calvinism rejected
the
mystical elements of Lutheranism, where humans were a vessel to be filled by
God.
Rather, Calvinists believed that God worked through them. Being in a state of
grace
meant that they were tools of divine will. Faith had to be shown in objective
results. What results did Calvinists look for? They looked for any activity
that
increased the glory of God. Such conduct could be based directly in the Bible,
or
indirectly through the purposeful order of God's world. Good works were not a
means to
salvation, but they were a sign of having been chosen.
Weber observes that Calvinism expected systematic self-control, and provided no
opportunity for forgiveness of weakness. "The God of Calvinism demanded of his
believers not single good works, but a life of good works combined into a
unified
system." This was a rational and systematic approach to life. Since people
had to
prove their faith through worldly activity, Calvinism demanded a kind of worldly
asceticism. It led to an attitude toward one's neighbor's sins that was not
sympathetic, but
rather full of hate, since he was God's enemy, bearing the signs of eternal
damnation.
This implied a "Christianization" of life that had dramatic practical
implications for the
way people lived their lives.
Furthermore, religions with a similar doctrine of proof had a similar influence
on
practical life. Predestination in its "magnificent consistency" was the
foundation for the
Puritans' methodical and rationalized ethics. The different branches of ascetic
Protestantism had elements of Calvinist thought, even if they did not embrace
Calvinism
as a whole. Weber again emphasizes how fundamental the idea of proof is for his
study.
His theory can be understood in its purest form through the Calvinist doctrine
of
predestination. Calvinism did have a unique consistency and an extraordinarily
powerful psychological effect. However, there is also a recurring
framework for the connection between faith and conduct in the other three
religions to be
presented.
Commentary
This chapter is somewhat disjointed from the rest of Weber's study, but does
attempt to
show some of the main aspects of Puritan life. Calvinism is Weber's primary
focus here, but in the next section he will more briefly present three other
ascetic
Protestant religions. In this section, Weber presents some of the most
fundamental
doctrines of Calvinism, as well as discussing how dogma affected practical
living. There
are a few key ideas to notice in Weber's discussion here. First, Calvinism was
important
because it stressed grace by results; there was a need for proof of one's
preordained fate.
This was not part of the original doctrine, but came out of psychological
necessity.
Second, notice the connection to the previous chapter's discussion of the
Protestant
calling. The sorts of "results" that Calvinists were looking for were part of
worldly
activity. Calvinists did not lead an isolated monastic lifestyle. They
participated in the
life of their communities, because this was part of God's expectations of them.
It is also important to notice how Weber presents Calvinism as the height of
rationalism.
It has a "magnificent consistency" and encourages systematic living and the
absence of
magic. What does Weber mean when he says that Calvinism is "rational"? The
word has
important meaning to Weber, and he uses it throughout this and other works. In
the
context of religion, "rationalization" implies systematization and consistency,
elaboration, and extension of doctrine. In terms of social institutions,
rationalization
implies ever-increasing knowledge in areas like calculation and efficiency. How
is
Calvinism rational? According to Weber, it is completely logically consistent.
If you
accept the Calvinists' presuppositions (such as the existence of God), then
their doctrines
contain no inner contradictions. Furthermore, Calvinism rejects all use of
"magic," such as
sacraments that will save those who partake in them. In contrast, the only
hints of salvation are based on a systematic and methodical life of virtue.
Calvinism was
uniquely rational in these regards. Look for Weber's use of the idea of
rationalization
throughout this work.