Search Menu

The Myth of Sisyphus

Albert Camus

Contents

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

page 1 of 3

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

Absurd Creation: Philosophy and Fiction

Summary

In this, the third part of the essay, Camus examines artistic creation— fiction writing in particular—as the epitome of the absurd life.

The absurd man, as we have seen, lives out a kind of mime. Aware that his actions are absurd and meaningless, he cannot take them fully seriously. Rather than live fully caught up in his actions and interactions, he sees himself playing out a kind of mime in which he acts out his life.

If the absurd life is played out as a mime, the act of creation is the greatest mime of all. An artist invents an entire world that mimics our own. The absurd man does not hope to explain life, but only to describe it: art reflects different aspects of, or perspectives on, life but cannot add anything to it. There is no meaning or transcendence to be found in art, as in life itself, but the creative act of asserting one's own perspective on the world epitomizes the revolt, freedom, and passion of the absurd man.

Both our impulse to think and our impulse to create arise from the anxiety we feel when we face the fundamental contradiction of the absurdity of our lives. As we saw in part one, thinkers generally try to evade this contradiction by leaping into faith or hope. Camus asks if the same is true for creation: do people inevitably try to use art to escape from the absurd? Or can there exist absurd art?

Camus suggests that efforts to draw some distinction between art and philosophy are generally vague or incorrect, and he attacks in particular the assertion that, while a philosopher works from within his system, an artist creates from without. Both artist and philosopher work to forge their particular perspective on the world, and must inhabit that perspective in order to be creative.

Absurd art must be content to describe and not to explain: it does not try to signify anything greater, to point to some sort of meaning or consolation in life. Just as the absurd man cannot hope for transcendence, absurd art cannot promise transcendence. Bad art will weigh itself down in pretensions by trying to give a universal picture of the way things are. Good art accepts that it can only portray a certain perspective, a certain piece of experience, and leaves everything universal or general at an implicit level. A good artist is also good at living: he is alert to the vivid nature of experience and can share it eloquently.

More Help

Previous Next
Reading is awesome

by MasondedeJohn, February 13, 2017

I think you could find something interesting here -

http://writemyessay4me.org/

. Especially if you need to order a great essay about some book.

0 Comments

1 out of 1 people found this helpful

essay help

by LeonMcMillen, August 08, 2017

My experience with essay services has generally been very positive. I requested a writer from

https://digitalessay.net

to write my English essay on Jane Eyre because I was really short on time (that week my family had to move houses unexpectedly and I had no time whatsoever to sit down at a computer and do work.) Needless to say the services were good and my essay was done really quickly. The writer that I picked followed directions well. Of course, if you can do it yourself, th... Read more

Help here

by TimBolton, September 04, 2017

Here you can find some help with your writing

https://eduessayhelper.org/

Good luck