# Conservation of Energy

### Potential Energy and Conservation of Energy

In conservative systems, we can define another form of energy, based on the configuration of the parts of the system, which we call potential energy. This quantity is related to work, and thus kinetic energy, through a simple equation. Using this relation we can finally quantify all mechanical energy, and prove the conservation of mechanical energy in conservative systems.

#### Potential Energy

Since mechanical energy must be conserved under conservative forces, but the kinetic energy can fluctuate based on the speed of the particles in the system, there must be an additional quantity of energy that is a property of the structure of the system. This quantity, potential energy, is denoted by the symbol U and can be easily derived from our knowledge of conservative systems.

Consider a system under the action of a conservative force. When work is done on the system it must in some way change the velocity of its constituent parts (by the Work Energy Theorem), and thus change the configuration of the system. We define potential energy as the energy of configuration of a conservative system, and relate it to work in the following way:

 ΔU = - W

In other words, work applied by a conservative force reduces the energy of configuration of a system (potential energy), converting it to kinetic energy.

To see exactly how this conservation works, let's derive the expression for the potential energy of a system acted upon by gravity. Consider a ball of mass m dropped from a height h. The only force acting upon the ball is gravity, so we know the system is conservative, since we proved it last section. How much work is done during the fall? A constant gravitational force of mg acts over a distance of h, so W = mgh . Thus, over the course of the fall, the potential energy is reduced by a factor of - mgh . We may define the potential energy to be zero when the ball hits the ground and calculate the potential energy at height h: ΔU = U f - U o = - mgh . Thus:

 U G = mgh

Since our choice of height h was arbitrary, this equation holds for all h relatively close to the center of the earth, and the equation is a universal definition of the gravitational potential energy.

An important property of energy is that it is a relative quantity. Just as observers moving with different velocities observe different values for the kinetic energy of a given particle, observers at a different height observe different values for gravitational potential energy, for example. When working problems we are free to choose whatever origin we like, to correspond to a convenient value for our potential energy.

Having defined potential energy, we can now see how it relates to kinetic energy, and generate our principle of conservation of mechanical energy.

#### Conservation of Mechanical Energy

We have just established that ΔU = - W , and we know from the Work- Energy Theorem that ΔK = W . Relating the two equations, we see that ΔU = - ΔK and thus ΔU + ΔK = 0 . Stated verbally, the sum of the change in kinetic and potential energy must always equal zero. By the associative property, we can also write that:

 Δ(U+K) = 0

Thus the sum of U and K must be a constant. This constant, denoted by E, is defined as the total mechanical energy of a conservative system. We can now generate a mathematical expression for the conservation of mechanical energy:

 U + K = E

This statement is true for all conservative systems, and thus for all systems in which U is defined.

With this equation we have completed our proof of the conservation of mechanical energy within conservative systems. The relation between U, K and E is elegantly simple, and is derived from our concepts of work, kinetic energy, and conservative forces. Such a relation is also a valuable tool in solving physical problems. Given an initial state in which we know both K and U, and asked to calculate one of these quantities in some final state, we simply equate the sums at each state: U o + K o = U f + K f . Such a relation further bypasses our kinematics laws, and makes calculations in conservative systems quite simple.

#### Using Calculus to find Potential Energy

Our calculation of the gravitational potential energy was quite easy. Such an easy calculation will not always be the case, and calculus can be a great help in generating an expression for the potential energy of a conservative system. Recall that work is defined in calculus as W = F(x)dx . Thus the change in potential is simply the negative of this integral.

To demonstrate how to calculate potential energy using vector calculus we shall do so for a mass-spring system. Consider a mass on a spring, at equilibrium at x = 0 . Recall that the force exerted by the spring, which is a conservative force, is: F s = - kx , where k is the spring constant. Let us also assign an arbitrary value to the potential at the equilibrium point: U(0) = 0 . We can now use our relation between potential and work to find the potential of the system a distance x from the origin:

U(x) - 0 = - (- kx)dx

Implying that

 U(x) = kx 2

This equation is true for all x. A calculation of the same form can be completed for any conservative system, and we thus have a universal method for calculating potential energy.

Though Newtonian mechanics provide an axiomatic basis for the study of mechanics, our concept of energy is more universal: energy applies not only to mechanics, but to electricity, waves, astrophysics, and even quantum mechanics. Energy pops up again and again in physics, and the conservation of energy remains one of the fundamental ideas of physics.

## Take a Study Break

### Star Trek gets SEXY

Chris Pine and Zoe Saldana heat up the red carpet!

### Are you afraid of relationships?

Auntie SparkNotes can help!

### Sexy starlet style

See every single look from the Met Gala!

### Geeky Actors: Then and Now

Travel back in time!

### Villains We Want These Actresses to Play

From super cute to super bad!

### 10 Movies Better Than Their Books

What do you think?

### How To Look Like J-Law...

When you don't look like J-Law.

### 12 Scientific Inaccuracies in Into Darkness

What did Star Trek get wrong?

## The Book

### Read What You Love, Anywhere You Like

Get Our FREE NOOK Reading Apps