|
|
◄
PREVIOUS
The Waste Land Section II: "A Game of Chess"
|
NEXT
► The Waste Land Section IV: "Death by Water"
|
Eliot's Poetry T. S. Eliot
The Waste Land
Section III: "The Fire Sermon"
Summary
The title of this, the longest section of The Waste Land, is taken from a
sermon given by Buddha in which he encourages his followers to give up earthly
passion (symbolized by fire) and seek freedom from earthly things. A turn away
from the earthly does indeed take place in this section, as a series of
increasingly debased sexual encounters concludes with a river-song and a
religious incantation. The section opens with a desolate riverside scene: Rats
and garbage surround the speaker, who is fishing and "musing on the king my
brother's wreck." The river-song begins in this section, with the refrain from
Spenser's Prothalamion: "Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song."
A snippet from a vulgar soldier's ballad follows, then a reference back to
Philomela (see the previous section). The speaker is then propositioned by Mr.
Eugenides, the one-eyed merchant of Madame Sosostris's tarot pack. Eugenides
invites the speaker to go with him to a hotel known as a meeting place for
homosexual trysts.
The speaker then proclaims himself to be Tiresias, a figure from classical
mythology who has both male and female features ("Old man with wrinkled female
breasts") and is blind but can "see" into the future. Tiresias/the speaker
observes a young typist, at home for tea, who awaits her lover, a dull and
slightly arrogant clerk. The woman allows the clerk to have his way with her,
and he leaves victorious. Tiresias, who has "foresuffered all," watches the
whole thing. After her lover's departure, the typist thinks only that she's
glad the encounter is done and over.
A brief interlude begins the river-song in earnest. First, a fisherman's bar is
described, then a beautiful church interior, then the Thames itself. These are
among the few moments of tranquility in the poem, and they seem to represent
some sort of simpler alternative. The Thames-daughters, borrowed from Spenser's
poem, chime in with a nonsense chorus ("Weialala leia / Wallala leialala"). The
scene shifts again, to Queen Elizabeth I in an amorous encounter with the Earl
of Leicester. The queen seems unmoved by her lover's declarations, and she thinks
only of her "people humble people who expect / Nothing." The section then comes
to an abrupt end with a few lines from St. Augustine's Confessions and a
vague reference to the Buddha's Fire Sermon ("burning").
Form
This section of The Waste Land is notable for its inclusion of popular
poetic forms, particularly musical ones. The more plot-driven sections are in
Eliot's usual assortment of various line lengths, rhymed at random. "The Fire
Sermon," however, also includes bits of many musical pieces, including Spenser's
wedding song (which becomes the song of the Thames-daughters), a soldier's
ballad, a nightingale's chirps, a song from Oliver Goldsmith's The Vicar of
Wakefield, and a mandolin tune (which has no words but is echoed in "a
clatter and a chatter from within"). The use of such "low" forms cuts both ways
here: In one sense, it provides a critical commentary on the episodes described,
the cheap sexual encounters shaped by popular culture (the gramophone, the men's
hotel). But Eliot also uses these bits and pieces to create high art, and some
of the fragments he uses (the lines from Spenser in particular) are themselves
taken from more exalted forms. In the case of the Prothalamion, in fact,
Eliot is placing himself within a tradition stretching back to ancient Greece
(classically, "prothalamion" is a generic term for a poem-like song written for a
wedding). Again this provides an ironic contrast to the debased goings-on but
also provides another form of connection and commentary. Another such
reference, generating both ironic distance and proximate parallels, is the
inclusion of Elizabeth I: The liaison between Elizabeth and Leicester is
traditionally romanticized, and, thus, the reference seems to clash with the
otherwise sordid nature of this section. However, Eliot depicts Elizabeth--and
Spenser, for that matter--as a mere fragment, stripped of noble connotations and
made to represent just one more piece of cultural rubbish. Again, this is not
meant to be a democratizing move but a nihilistic one: Romance is dead.
Commentary
The opening two stanzas of this section describe the ultimate "Waste Land" as
Eliot sees it. The wasteland is cold, dry, and barren, covered in garbage.
Unlike the desert, which at least burns with heat, this place is static, save
for a few scurrying rats. Even the river, normally a symbol of renewal, has
been reduced to a "dull canal." The ugliness stands in implicit contrast to the
"Sweet Thames" of Spenser's time. The most significant image in these lines,
though, is the rat. Like the crabs in Prufrock, rats are scavengers,
taking what they can from the refuse of higher-order creatures. The rat could
be said to provide a model for Eliot's poetic process: Like the rat, Eliot takes
what he can from earlier, grander generations and uses the bits and pieces to
sustain (poetic) life. Somehow this is preferable to the more coherent but
vulgar existence of the contemporary world, here represented by the sound of
horns and motors in the distance, intimating a sexual liaison.
The actual sexual encounters that take place in this section of the poem are
infinitely unfruitful. Eugenides proposes a homosexual tryst, which by its very
nature thwarts fertility. The impossibility of regeneration by such means is
symbolized by the currants in his pocket--the desiccated, deadened version of
what were once plump, fertile fruits. The typist and her lover are equally
barren in their way, even though reproduction is at least theoretically possible
for the two. Living in so impoverished a manner that she does not even own a
bed, the typist is certainly not interested in a family. Elizabeth and
Leicester are perhaps the most interesting of the three couples, however. For
political reasons, Elizabeth was required to represent herself as constantly
available for marriage (to royalty from countries with whom England may have
wanted an alliance); out of this need came the myth of the "Virgin Queen." This
can be read as the opposite of the Fisher King legend: To protect the vitality
of the land, Elizabeth had to compromise her own sexuality; whereas in the Fisher
King story, the renewal of the land comes with the renewal of the Fisher King's
sexual potency. Her tryst with Leicester, therefore, is a consummation that is
simultaneously denied, an event that never happened. The twisted logic
underlying Elizabeth's public sexuality, or lack thereof, mirrors and distorts
the Fisher King plot and further questions the possibility for renewal,
especially through sexuality, in the modern world.
Tiresias, thus, becomes an important model for modern existence. Neither man nor
woman, and blind yet able to see with ultimate clarity, he is an individual who
does not hope or act. He has, like Prufrock, "seen it all," but, unlike
Prufrock, he sees no possibility for action. Whereas Prufrock is paralyzed by
his neuroses, Tiresias is held motionless by ennui and pragmatism. He is not
quite able to escape earthly things, though, for he is forced to sit and watch
the sordid deeds of mortals; like the Sibyl in the poem's epigraph, he would like
to die but cannot. The brief interlude following the typist's tryst may offer
an alternative to escape, by describing a warm, everyday scene of work and
companionship; however, the interlude is brief, and Eliot once again tosses us
into a world of sex and strife. Tiresias disappears, to be replaced by St.
Augustine at the end of the section. Eliot claims in his footnote to have
deliberately conflated Augustine and the Buddha, as the representatives of
Eastern and Western asceticism. Both seem, in the lines Eliot quotes, to be
unable to transcend the world on their own: Augustine must call on God to
"pluck [him] out," while Buddha can only repeat the word "burning," unable to
break free of its monotonous fascination. The poem's next section, which will
relate the story of a death without resurrection, exposes the absurdity of these
two figures' faith in external higher powers. That this section ends with only
the single word "burning," isolated on the page, reveals the futility of all of
man's struggles.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
◄
PREVIOUS
The Waste Land Section II: "A Game of Chess"
|
NEXT
► The Waste Land Section IV: "Death by Water"
|
|
|