|
|
Organic Molecular Orbitals
Valence Bond Theory
So far we've presented a straightforward view of covalent
bonding as the
sharing of electrons between two atoms. However, we have yet to answer
questions such as these: How are electrons shared? What orbitals do shared
electrons reside in? Can we say anything about the energies of these
shared electrons? Our task now is to extend the orbital scheme that we've
developed for atoms to describe bonding in molecules.
Introduction to Valence Bond Theory
Valence bond theory (VB) is a straightforward extension of Lewis
structures. Valence bond theory says that electrons in a covalent bond
reside in a region that is the overlap of individual atomic
orbitals. For example, the covalent bond in molecular hydrogen can be
thought of as result of the overlap of two hydrogen 1 s orbitals.
Figure 1.1: Two hydrogen 1s orbitals overlap to form a covalent bond.
Molecular Geometry
In order to understand the limitations of valence bond theory, first we must
digress to discuss molecular geometry, which is the spatial arrangement of
covalent bonds around an atom. A very simple and intuitive approach, the
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model, is used to explain
molecular geometry. VSEPR states that electron pairs tend to arrange
themselves around an atom in such a way that repulsions between
pairs are minimized.
/PARGRAPH
For instance, VSEPR predicts that carbon, which has a valence of four, should
have a tetrahedral geometry. This is the observed geometry of methane
(CH4). In such an arrangement, each bond about carbon points to the
vertices of an imaginary tetrahedron, with bond angles of 109.5 degrees, which
is the largest bond angle that can be attained between all four bonding pairs at
once. Similarly, the best arrangement for three electron pairs is a trigonal
planar geometry with bond angles of 120 degrees. The best arrangement for
two pairs is a linear geometry with a bond angle of 180 degrees.
Figure 1.2: Optimal spatial arrangements for 4, 3, and 2 electron pairs
around an atom.
The VSEPR scheme includes lone pairs as well as bonded pairs. Since lone
pairs are closer to the atom, they actually take up slightly more space
then bonded pairs. However, lone pairs are "invisible" as far as the
geometry of the atom is concerned. For instance, ammonia (CH3) has
three C-H bonded pairs and one lone pair. These four electrons will, like
methane, occupy a tetrahedral arrangement. Since lone pairs take more space,
the H-N-H bond angle is reduced from 109.5 degrees to about 107 degrees. The
geometry of ammonia is trigonal pyramidal rather than tetrahedral since
the lone pair is not included. By similar reasoning, water has a bent
geometry with a bond angle of about 105 degrees.
Figure 1.3: Geometries of methane, ammonia, and water.
Note that multiple bonds don't affect the VSEPR scheme. A double or triple bond
is considered no more repulsive than a single bond.
Hybrid Orbitals
The Valence Bond model runs into problems as soon as we try to take
molecular geometries into account. The tetrahedral geometry of methane
is clearly impossible if carbon uses its 2s and 2p orbitals to form the C-H
bonds, which should yield bond angles of 90 degrees.
Figure 1.4: The discrepancy between the spatial arrangement of the atomic
orbitals of carbon and the geometry of methane.
Chemists invoke the concept of hybridization to explain this discrepancy.
Under this concept, to accommodate the geometry of molecules, atomic orbitals
modify themselves to become hybrid orbitals of the suitable geometry. For
instance, to attain a tetrahedral arrangement the carbon undergoes sp3
hybridization: the 2s orbital and three 2p orbitals become four sp3
hybrid orbitals. Note that the total number of orbitals is conserved, but
the orientation and energy of the orbitals have changed.
Figure 1.5: Hybridization of s and p orbitals into sp3 hybrid orbitals.
Orbital View of Multiple Bonding
Single covalent bonds can be explained by the VB model as the result of a
head-on overlap between atomic orbitals. In some cases, these may be
hybrid orbitals. Such head-on overlap is a sigma bond (σ bond),
so-called because of the bond's cylindrical symmetry. Only one σ bond can exist
between two given atoms. How, then, are double and triple bonds formed?
The answer lies in the fact that p-orbitals are capable of overlapping
sideways
in what is called a pi bond (π bond). π bonds are weaker than
σ bonds because
sideways overlap is not as effective as head-on overlap. For example, a C-C
σ bond has a typical bond energy of 80 kcal/mol, but the C-C π bond
energy is
usually around 60 kcal/mol.
Consider ethylene, which has a C=C double bond. Each carbon has three
bonds in the VSEPR scheme, so each carbon has a trigonal planar geometry.
To accommodate this geometry each carbon undergoes sp2 hybridization.
The 2s orbital and two of the 2p orbitals hybridize to form
three sp2 hybrid orbitals. The last p-orbital of each carbon atom
remains unhybridized. These unhybridized p-orbitals overlap with one another
to
form the necessary π-bond.
Figure 1.6: Hybridization into sp2 orbitals and π bond formation
in ethylene.
Triple bonds are formed in a similar process. In acetylene, the C-C triple
bond is actually one σ bond and two π bonds. Each carbon undergoes
sp hybridization. The two unhybridized p-orbitals on each carbon
form two orthogonal π-bonds.
Figure 1.7: Hybridization into sp orbitals and bonding in acetylene.
The Valence Bond Model: Conclusions
The valence bond model provides a simple and useful framework through which we
mayunderstand covalent bonding. However it has several drawbacks. First, when
using this model it is difficult to say anything about the energies of
electrons. A more serious drawback of the VB model is its assumption that
electrons are localized to specific atoms. In fact electrons are commonly
delocalized to several atoms, as described by resonance structures. The
Molecular Orbital model, while
more complex, addresses both of these issues.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|