page 1 of 2
Now, Lee is at the typewriter pecking away with one finger while Austin lies on the floor, dead drunk. Austin is singing a drunken song about the sunset when Lee yells for him to be quiet. Lee needs to concentrate, as he is the screenwriter now. Austin, balking at the idea of Lee writing an entire screenplay by himself, makes the drunken suggestion that Saul Kimmer thinks Lee and Austin are the same person. Lee dismisses this remark as the liquor talking and asks for quiet again, assuring Austin that if it were not for the racket, he could rattle off the whole screenplay in one night.
Austin reasons that since Lee is now the screenwriter, he himself should now become the thief. Lee laughs heartily at the idea and makes a bet that Austin could not even steal a toaster. Initially the bet is for shared screen credit, but the stakes end up increasing to include Austin's house. All Austin wants in return, if he wins the bet, is a knick-knack from the days Lee spent in the desert. Lee, annoyed with the jabbering and with his own his inability to concentrate, smashes the typewriter into the table. Austin excuses himself, promising to see Lee in a bit.
In the same mocking vocabulary Lee has used in the play's opening scenes, Austin denounces Lee's efforts at screenwriting and pledges to take a look around the neighborhood for good places from which to steal. When Austin tries to leave, however, he only falls to the floor drunk. Lee offers to call Austin's wife, but Austin says that he needs no one's help and that he is going to steal a toaster and commit crimes bigger than anything Lee ever did. Austin manages to stand up and talks about the suburbia he is going to steal from as a sort of latter day nirvana—a speech Lee says resembles the way the old man used to talk.
Austin says that all three of them sound the same when drunk. When Lee once again mentions the prospect of bringing the old man out there with money earned from the screenplay, Austin takes a swing but then falls down. Austin says he does not want to have anything to do with the old man. Lee asks for help on the screenplay again: just a little bit, he says, just the characters. Austin insults Lee's story and his abilities as a screenwriter. Lee offers to leave on the condition that Austin help him with the screenplay, which piques Austin's interest. When asked where he would go, Lee says that he would just disappear. Austin denies the possibility of his brother disappearing, as it seems that the old man tried that once a long time ago.
Lee joins Austin on the floor for a drink, and Austin tells the vivid story of how the old man went to Mexico to get all of his teeth pulled and ended up losing his false teeth in a doggy bag of Chop Suey. Lee listens intently, unaware that the old man had any need for false teeth or that he had lost them. At the end of the story Austin declares that it is a story that is true to life.
Austin's suggestion that Saul Kimmer thinks that the two brothers are the same person is the most explicit reference to the fact that the two men represent opposite sides of a single creative artist. Individually, each brother is unable to complete anything. Here, we see Lee struggling at the typewriter, begging for even the smallest assistance from Austin. The brothers' animosity is the fundamental relationship that exists in each act of creation. Looking at the play with this relationship in mind removes the story from its seemingly naturalistic limitations and transforms it into an archetypal examination of what it means to be an artist. The struggle for creation is an extremely violent one, as demonstrated by the brothers' bickering and fighting.
Take a Study Break!