Depicting the Psychology of War
Apocalypse Now illustrates the horror,
the absurdity, and the futility of war, but most important it portrays
war’s damaging psychological effects. As it charts the characters’
descents into literal and metaphorical darkness and fog, the film
suggests that war indulges the darkest, foggiest parts of human
nature. The protagonist, Willard, is introduced as a man already
pushed off-kilter by his first tour in Vietnam. His unsettling behavior
in the opening hotel room scene marks the beginning of his descent
and immediately raises questions as to his sanity. He can barely
stand up. He punches a fist into a mirror, destroying himself symbolically.
He wails. He cannot wait to get back to the jungle. This scene,
as well as its preceding narration, illustrates war’s capacity to
change a person’s psyche substantially. Willard can no longer lead
a normal life within the confines of civilization. He has tried
and failed, and now he feels compelled to return to combat.
When the film begins, Willard is already psychologically
damaged by the war, and his crewmates are about to experience similar damage.
If one were to take “before” and “after” snapshots of the PBR crew,
the changes that take place during their participation in Willard’s
mission would be clearly evident. When Willard first boards the
boat, its crew members seem excited by and perhaps somewhat naïve
about the journey ahead of them. Lance, particularly unaffected
by the war around him, occupies himself with his tan. Young Clean,
clueless in combat, still gets a thrill out of the radio, and Chef
is so much in denial that he thinks it perfectly safe to go on a
mango hunt in the middle of the jungle at nightfall. Chief too seems
overly calm and optimistic. But the crew’s morale plummets quickly
as the journey progresses, and each character’s sanity becomes less
certain. Lance moves further inward, helped by various drugs, and
by the film’s end he is seen frolicking in a loincloth and face
paint. Clean loses control during the inspection of the sampan,
firing at will with little provocation. Chef reaches his breaking point
after a run-in with a tiger, and Chief experiences an intense emotional
breakdown when Clean is killed by enemy gunfire.
Meanwhile, Willard becomes increasingly infatuated with
his elusive target, Kurtz. He obsessively reviews Kurtz’s dossier,
ultimately aligning himself strongly with the philosophy therein.
In narration, Willard reads aloud a letter written by Kurtz to his
son, and momentarily the voice of the “I” is unclear—are the words
those of Willard or Kurtz? Willard’s sense of self has become confused.
He feels a strong admiration for and connection to Kurtz, while
at the same time he harbors vague suspicions about Kurtz’s “methods”—even
though he has yet to encounter the man or the methods first-hand.
Upon meeting Kurtz at last, Willard realizes that Kurtz
has experienced a break from reality and is indeed insane. Kurtz
has given into the primordial temptations of jungle life, killing
at random and leaving dead bodies and severed heads as testament
to his omnipotent mayhem. He has indulged himself and become a godlike
figure, worshiped by many, answering to no one or nothing. He justifies
his unconscionable behavior by declaring moral judgment a liability
in wartime: “It’s judgment that defeats us.”
Such an extreme characterization of Kurtz’s appalling
lifestyle implies that freedom from all societal constraints results
in insanity. Kurtz’s last words are “the horror,” a phrase that
conjures up the darkest parts of the human soul, where Kurtz has
resided since he “got off the boat.” Despite Willard’s identification
with Kurtz, he does not take up Kurtz’s throne. He leaves the compound,
rejecting that darkest part of himself and presumably heading back
into the civilized world. A descent too far inward thus becomes
a descent into hell—a hell brought on by the metaphorical journey
upriver. The atrocities of war have caused the each character to
lose all sense of self and to become an other, an empty shell that
can no longer recognize itself or, like Kurtz, discriminate along
moral lines. But while Apocalypse Now implies that
war effectively displaces the self and the rights and wrongs of
morality, its conclusion suggests that the soul is capable of rejecting
such darkness.