|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home : English : Literature Study Guides : The Canterbury Tales : The Pardoner’s Introduction, Prologue, and Tale
The Pardoner’s Introduction, Prologue, and Tale
Fragment VI, lines 287–968
Summary: Introduction to the Pardoner’s Tale
The Host reacts to the Physician’s Tale, which has just
been told. He is shocked at the death of the young Roman girl in
the tale, and mourns the fact that her beauty ultimately caused
the chain of events that led her father to kill her. Wanting to
cheer up, the Host asks the Pardoner to tell the group a merrier,
farcical tale. The Pardoner agrees, but will continue only after
he has food and drink in his stomach. Other pilgrims interject that
they would prefer to hear a moral story, and the Pardoner again
agrees. Summary: Prologue to the Pardoner’s Tale
My theme is alwey oon, and evere was—
Radix malorum est Cupiditas. After getting a drink, the Pardoner begins his Prologue.
He tells the company about his occupation—a combination of itinerant
preaching and selling promises of salvation. His sermon topic always remains
the same: Radix malorum est Cupiditas, or “greed
is the root of all evil.” He gives a similar sermon to every congregation and
then breaks out his bag of “relics”—which, he readily admits to the
listening pilgrims, are fake. He will take a sheep’s bone and claim it
has miraculous healing powers for all kinds of ailments. The parishioners
always believe him and make their offerings to the relics, which
the Pardoner quickly pockets.
The Pardoner admits that he preaches solely to get money,
not to correct sin. He argues that many sermons are the product
of evil intentions. By preaching, the Pardoner can get back at anyone
who has offended him or his brethren. In his sermon, he always preaches about
covetousness, the very vice that he himself is gripped by. His one
and only interest is to fill his ever-deepening pockets. He would rather
take the last penny from a widow and her starving family than give
up his money, and the good cheeses, breads, and wines that such
income brings him. Speaking of alcohol, he notes, he has now finished
his drink of “corny ale” and is ready to begin his tale. Summary: The Pardoner’s Tale
The Pardoner describes a group of young Flemish people
who spend their time drinking and reveling, indulging in all forms
of excess. After commenting on their lifestyle of debauchery,
the Pardoner enters into a tirade against the vices that they practice.
First and foremost is gluttony, which he identifies as the sin that
first caused the fall of mankind in Eden. Next, he attacks drunkenness,
which makes a man seem mad and witless. Next is gambling, the temptation
that ruins men of power and wealth. Finally, he denounces swearing.
He argues that it so offends God that he forbade swearing in the
Second Commandment—placing it higher up on the list than homicide.
After almost two hundred lines of sermonizing, the Pardoner finally
returns to his story of the lecherous Flemish youngsters.
As three of these rioters sit drinking, they hear a funeral
knell. One of the revelers’ servants tells the group that an old
friend of theirs was slain that very night by a mysterious figure
named Death. The rioters are outraged and, in their drunkenness,
decide to find and kill Death to avenge their friend. Traveling
down the road, they meet an old man who appears sorrowful. He says
his sorrow stems from old age—he has been waiting for Death to come
and take him for some time, and he has wandered all over the world.
The youths, hearing the name of Death, demand to know
where they can find him. The old man directs them into a grove,
where he says he just left Death under an oak tree. The rioters
rush to the tree, underneath which they find not Death but eight
bushels of gold coins with no owner in sight.
At first, they are speechless, but, then, the slyest of
the three reminds them that if they carry the gold into town in
daylight, they will be taken for thieves. They must transport the
gold under cover of night, and so someone must run into town to
fetch bread and wine in the meantime. They draw lots, and the youngest
of the three loses and runs off toward town. As soon as he is gone,
the sly plotter turns to his friend and divulges his plan: when
their friend returns from town, they will kill him and therefore
receive greater shares of the wealth. The second rioter agrees,
and they prepare their trap. Back in town, the youngest vagrant
is having similar thoughts. He could easily be the richest man in
town, he realizes, if he could have all the gold to himself. He
goes to the apothecary and buys the strongest poison available,
then puts the poison into two bottles of wine, leaving a third bottle
pure for himself. He returns to the tree, but the other two rioters
leap out and kill him.
They sit down to drink their friend’s wine and celebrate,
but each happens to pick up a poisoned bottle. Within minutes, they
lie dead next to their friend. Thus, concludes the Pardoner, all
must beware the sin of avarice, which can only bring treachery and
death. He realizes that he has forgotten something: he has relics
and pardons in his bag. According to his custom, he tells the pilgrims
the value of his relics and asks for contributions—even though he
has just told them the relics are fake. He offers the Host the first
chance to come forth and kiss the relics, since the Host is clearly
the most enveloped in sin (942). The Host
is outraged and proposes to make a relic out of the Pardoner’s genitals,
but the Knight calms everybody down. The Host and Pardoner kiss
and make up, and all have a good laugh as they continue on their
way. Analysis
We know from the General Prologue that the Pardoner is
as corrupt as others in his profession, but his frankness about
his own hypocrisy is nevertheless shocking. He bluntly accuses himself
of fraud, avarice, and gluttony—the very things he preaches against.
And yet, rather than expressing any sort of remorse with his confession,
he takes a perverse pride in the depth of his corruption. The Pardoner’s earnestness
in portraying himself as totally amoral seems almost too extreme
to be accurate. His boasts about his corruption may represent his
attempt to cover up his doubts or anxieties about the life of crime
(in the name of religion) that he has adopted. It is possible to argue
that the Pardoner sacrifices his own spiritual good to cure the sins
of others. Yet he doesn’t seem to really consider his spiritual
corruption a real sacrifice, since he loves the money and the comforts
it brings him. Either way, he quickly covers up his statement, which shows
at least a flicker of interest in the good of other people, with a
renewed proclamation of his own selfishness: “But that is nat my principal
entente; / I preche nothyng but for coveitise” (432–433).
The Pardoner’s Tale is an example, a type of story often
used by preachers to emphasize a moral point to their audience.
The Pardoner has told us in his Prologue that his main theme—“Greed
is the root of all evil”—never changes. We can assume that the Pardoner
is well practiced in the art of telling this specific tale,
and he even inserts some of his sermon into it. The Pardoner’s point
is quite obvious—his tale shows the disastrous effects of greed.
The hypocrisy he has described in his Prologue becomes evident in
his tale, as all the vices he lists in his diatribe at the beginning—gluttony,
drunkenness, gambling, and swearing—are faults that he himself has
either displayed to the other pilgrims or proudly claimed to possess.
Ridiculously, when he has finished his condemnation of swearing,
he begins the tale swearing his own oath: “Now, for the love of
Crist, that for us dyde … now wol I telle forth my tale” (658–660).
Such an overtly hypocritical act is perfectly consistent with the
character that the Pardoner has presented to us, and an example
of Chaucer’s typically wry comedy.
As if on automatic pilot, the Pardoner completes his tale
just as he would when preaching in the villages, by displaying his
false relics and asking for contributions. His act is intriguing,
for he makes no acknowledgment of his hypocrisy. Only a few lines
before, in his Prologue, he exposed to the entire company the fraudulence
of his whole operation. It is inconceivable that he would now expect
to get contributions from his fellow travelers—so why does he ask
for them? Perhaps, like a professional actor, the Pardoner enjoys
the challenge of telling his tale so convincingly that he tricks
his audience into belief, even after he has explained
to them his corrupt nature. Or perhaps he takes delight in showing
the audience how his routine works, as an actor might enjoy showing
people backstage. In any case, the Pardoner’s attempt to sell pardons
to the pilgrims is a source of rancor for the Host, because, in
trying to swindle the other pilgrims, the Pardoner has violated
the Host’s notion of fellowship on which the storytelling pilgrimage
is based. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||