Important Quotations Explained
1. We
are punished for our refusals. Every impulse that we strive to strangle
broods in the mind, and poisons us. The body sins once, and has
done with its sin, for action is a mode of purification. . . . Resist
it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has
forbidden to itself, with desire for what its monstrous laws have
made monstrous and unlawful. It has been said that the great events
of the world take place in the brain. It is in the brain, and the
brain only, that the great sins of the world take place also.
Lord Henry begins his seduction of Dorian’s
mind with these words in Chapter Two. Lord Henry advocates a return
to the “Hellenic ideal,” to the sensibilities of ancient Greece
where the appreciation of beauty reigned. He strikes a contrast
between those glory days and the present mode of living, which,
he believes, is marked by a morality that demands self-denial. The
outcome of denial, he goes on to say, is only a stronger desire
for that which has been denied. This passage is a bold challenge
to conventional and restrictive Victorian morality; it dismisses
the notion of sin as a figment of the imagination. Interestingly,
if sin is relegated to the mind, as Lord Henry would have it, then
it should follow that the body is free from the effects of sin.
According to this line of thinking, Dorian’s tragedy, then, is that
he is unable to purge his “monstrous and unlawful” acts from his
conscience. One must remember, however, that Lord Henry has failed
to put his philosophy to the test. Although he is a great advocate
of sin, he is hardly a sinner, and his understanding of the soul—sickened
or otherwise—never incorporates the knowledge that Dorian gradually
acquires.
2. “To
be good is to be in harmony with one’s self,” he replied, touching
the thin stem of his glass with his pale, fine-pointed fingers.
“Discord is to be forced to be in harmony with others. One’s own
life—that is the important thing. As for the lives of one’s neighbours,
if one wishes to be a prig or a Puritan, one can flaunt one’s moral
views about them, but they are not one’s concern. Besides, Individualism
has really the higher aim. Modern morality consists in accepting
the standard of one’s age. I consider that for any man of culture to
accept the standard of his age is a form of the grossest immorality.”
As Dorian prepares, in Chapter Six,
to escort Lord Henry and Basil to the theater to see Sibyl Vane
perform, Lord Henry chastises Dorian for dismissing, in the face
of love, all of his “wrong, fascinating, poisonous, delightful theories.”
Here, Lord Henry expounds on the virtues of individualism, which
dictate that one develop according to one’s own standards. His outlook
relies on Darwinism, a fashionable theory at the time that asserted
that an organism’s development would be altered or impaired if it
were made to adjust to the standards of another organism. Lord Henry
fancies that he and Dorian are creatures that require different
standards than the masses in order to develop fully. Thus, he readily
rejects modern morality, which governs the many, in favor of a self-determined morality
that applies only to himself. Although far from a prig or a Puritan,
Lord Henry does spend an inordinate amount of time worrying over
Dorian’s development. Contrary to the principle of individualism
he takes the time to relate, he not only does his best to insinuate
himself between Dorian and Sibyl, but he also takes up Dorian’s
proper social development as his pet cause.
3. Yes:
there was to be, as Lord Henry had prophesied, a new Hedonism that
was to re-create life, and to save it from that harsh, uncomely
puritanism that is having, in our own day, its curious revival.
It was to have its service of the intellect, certainly; yet it was
never to accept any theory or system that would involve the sacrifice
of any mode of passionate experience. Its aim, indeed, was to be
experience itself, and not the fruits of experience, sweet or bitter
as they might be. Of the asceticism that deadens the senses, as
of the vulgar profligacy that dulls them, it was to know nothing.
But it was to teach man to concentrate himself upon the moments of
a life that is itself but a moment.
This passage from Chapter Eleven describes
how Dorian, adjusting to the strange privilege that his portrait
affords him, devotes himself to acquiring as many experiences as
possible. Here, in order to discover “the true nature of the senses,”
Dorian studies rare musical instruments, the arts of jewelry and
embroidery, and the psychological effects of perfume. In addition
to these pursuits, he begins to devote his time to more sordid affairs,
the nature of which is never perfectly clear. We learn, from Basil’s
subsequent confrontation, that Dorian is connected with the downfall
of numerous youths, all of whom have been brought to shame (and
some even driven to suicide) by their associations with Dorian.
Whether the outcome of these experiences is “sweet or bitter” is
not the point of the philosophy by which Dorian lives; on the contrary,
the experience itself is what matters. This “new Hedonism” is a
form of resistance against the conventional morality that Lord Henry
spends so much of his time criticizing.
4. Society,
civilized society at least, is never very ready to believe anything
to the detriment of those who are both rich and fascinating. It
feels instinctively that manners are of more importance than morals,
and, in its opinion, the highest respectability is of much less
value than the possession of a good chef. And, after all, it is
a very poor consolation to be told that the man who has given one
a bad dinner, or poor wine, is irreproachable in his private life. Even
the cardinal virtues cannot atone for half-cold entrées, as Lord
Henry remarked once, in a discussion on the subject; and there is
possibly a good deal to be said for his view. For the canons of
good society are, or should be, the same as the canons of art. Form
is absolutely essential to it. It should have the dignity of a ceremony,
as well as its unreality, and should combine the insincere character
of a romantic play with the wit and beauty that make such plays delightful
to us. Is insincerity such a terrible thing? I think not. It is
merely a method by which we can multiply our personalities.
This passage, taken from Chapter Eleven,
is important because it contains the novel’s only lapse into first-person
narration. Here, Wilde appears from behind the scenes to comment
on civilized society. He asks the reader if the insincerity necessary
to conduct oneself in polite society is “such a terrible thing,”
and admits that, in his opinion, it is not. He points, rather unapologetically,
to the surface nature of the society in which he lives and repeats
a favorite epigram that he also includes in his play Lady
Windermere’s Fan: “manners are of more importance than
morals.” Indeed, The Picture of Dorian Gray fully
supports the observations that Wilde makes in this paragraph. Despite
the corrupt nature of Dorian’s soul and despite his utter lack of
an acceptable moral code, he continues to be welcomed into society
merely because he looks good.
5. “[Y]ou
poisoned me with a book once. I should not forgive that. Harry,
promise me that you will never lend that book to anyone. It does
harm.”
“My dear boy, you are really beginning to moralize.
You will soon be going about like the converted, and the revivalist,
warning people against all the sins of which you have grown tired.
You are much too delightful to do that.... As for being poisoned
by a book, there is no such thing as that. Art has no influence
upon action. It annihilates the desire to act. It is superbly sterile.
The books that the world calls immoral are books that show the world
its own shame.”
This exchange between Dorian and Lord
Henry takes place in Chapter Nineteen, as Dorian, flayed by his
conscience, pledges to live a reformed life. Reflecting on the course
of his past twenty years, he confronts Lord Henry, whom he believes
is responsible for leading him astray. Dorian criticizes the yellow
book that, years before, had such a profound influence over him,
claiming that this book did him great harm. This accusation is,
of course, alien to Wilde’s philosophy of aestheticism, which holds
that art cannot be either moral or immoral. Lord Henry says as much,
refusing to believe that a book could have such power. While there
is something seductive in his observation that “the world calls
immoral . . . books that show the world its own shame,” Lord Henry’s
words here are less convincing than other statements to the same
effect that he makes earlier in the novel. In the latter stages
of the novel, we know of Dorian’s downfall, and we know that he
is anything but “delightful.” At this point, Lord Henry’s praising
of Dorian makes Lord Henry seem hopelessly naïve, the victim of
a philosophy whose consequences elude him.