|
|
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Robert Louis Stevenson
Chapters 6–7
Summary Chapter 6: Remarkable Incident of Dr. Lanyon
As time passes, with no sign of Hyde's reappearance, Jekyll
becomes healthier-looking and more sociable, devoting himself to
charity. To Utterson, it appears that the removal of Hyde's evil
influence has had a tremendously positive effect on Jekyll. After
two months of this placid lifestyle, Jekyll holds a dinner party,
which both Utterson and Lanyon attend, and the three talk together
as old friends. But a few days later, when Utterson calls on Jekyll,
Poole reports that his master is receiving no visitors.
This scenario repeats itself for a week, so Utterson goes
to visit Lanyon, hoping to learn why Jekyll has refused any company.
He finds Lanyon in very poor health, pale and sickly, with a frightened look
in his eyes. Lanyon explains that he has had a great shock and expects
to die in a few weeks. [L]ife has been pleasant, he says. I liked
it; yes, sir, I used to like it. Then he adds, I sometimes think if
we knew all, we should be more glad to get away. When Utterson mentions
that Jekyll also seems ill, Lanyon violently demands that they talk
of anything but Jekyll. He promises that after his death, Utterson
may learn the truth about everything, but for now he will not discuss
it. Afterward, at home, Utterson writes to Jekyll, talking about
being turned away from Jekyll's house and inquiring as to what caused
the break between him and Lanyon. Soon Jekyll's written reply arrives,
explaining that while he still cares for Lanyon, he understands
why the doctor says they must not meet. As for Jekyll himself, he
pledges his continued affection for Utterson but adds that from
now on he will be maintaining a strict seclusion, seeing no one.
He says that he is suffering a punishment that he cannot name.
Lanyon dies a few weeks later, fulfilling his prophecy.
After the funeral, Utterson takes from his safe a letter that Lanyon
meant for him to read after he died. Inside, Utterson finds only
another envelope, marked to remain sealed until Jekyll also has
died. Out of professional principle, Utterson overcomes his curiosity
and puts the envelope away for safekeeping. As weeks pass, he calls
on Jekyll less and less frequently, and the butler continues to
refuse him entry.
Summary Chapter 7: Incident at the Window
The following Sunday, Utterson and Enfield are taking
their regular stroll. Passing the door where Enfield once saw Hyde
enter to retrieve Jekyll's check, Enfield remarks on the murder
case. He notes that the story that began with the trampling has
reached an end, as London will never again see Mr. Hyde. Enfield
mentions that in the intervening weeks he has learned that the run-down
laboratory they pass is physically connected to Jekyll's house,
and they both stop to peer into the house's windows, with Utterson
noting his concern for Jekyll's health. To their surprise, the two
men find Jekyll at the window, enjoying the fresh air. Jekyll complains
that he feels very low, and Utterson suggests that he join them
for a walk, to help his circulation. Jekyll refuses, saying that
he cannot go out. Then, just as they resume polite conversation,
a look of terror seizes his face, and he quickly shuts the window
and vanishes. Utterson and Enfield depart in shocked silence.
Analysis Chapters 6–7
By this point in the story, it becomes clear that the
mystery of Jekyll's relationship to Hyde has proven too much for
Utterson's rational approach and search for logical explanations.
The uncanny aspects of Hyde's appearance, behavior, and ability
to disappear should suffice to indicate the fantastical air of the
situation. At this point, however, the strange tragedy surrounding
Lanyon roots the mystery in distinctly supernatural territory. Until
this point, Lanyon's main significance to the story has been his
function as a representative of reason. He dismisses Jekyll's experiments
as unscientific balderdash and embodies the rational man of science,
in distinct opposition to superstition and fantasy. Ironically,
all of Lanyon's earlier sentiments seem to have given way to a cryptic,
unexplained horror. Lanyon's deterioration mirrors the gradual erosion
of logic in the face of the supernatural in the novel.
This erosion is accompanied by a further breakdown of
language. As we see earlier, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde seems
to present languagea rational, logical mode of perceiving and containing
the worldas existing in opposition to the fanciful or fantastical.
For example, Stevenson refrains from describing Hyde's crimes or Jekyll's
youthful debaucheries in detail, as if such explanations might reduce
the haunting effect of these wicked actions. Correspondingly, just
as language might break down and defuse an aura of the uncanny,
the uncanny can prompt a breakdown in language. Hyde's ugliness
instigates one such loss of words. As we have seen, when Enfield
and Utterson see Hyde's face, they prove unable to describe what
exactly makes Hyde so ugly and frightening.
But the novel is permeated by other silences as well,
more akin to refusals than failures to speak: Lanyon refuses to
describe to Utterson what he has seen; Jekyll declines to discuss
his relationship with Hyde; after witnessing Jekyll's strange disappearance
from the window, Utterson and Enfield say almost nothing about it;
and Utterson carries out an informal investigation of Hyde and Jekyll
but never mentions his suspicions to anyone. This second set of
silences derives not so much from being involuntarily awestruck
by the uncanny, but rather points to an acknowledgment of a situation
that exceeds the boundaries of logic, yet with an unwillingness
to pursue it further or express it openly. Such unwillingness seems
to stem, in turn, from a concern for reputation and public morality.
Significantly, both Jekyll and Lanyon leave written records of what
they have seen and done but insist that these records not be opened
until after their deaths. In other words, the truth can be exposed
only after the death of the person whose reputation it might ruin.
Stevenson may suggest that such refusals to discuss the grittier
side of life mirror a similar tendency in Victorian society at large.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|