|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Episode Two: “Nestor”
Amor matris: subjective and objective genitive. Summary
Stephen is teaching a history class on Pyrrhus’s victory—the
class is not very disciplined. He drills the students, and a boy
named Armstrong phonetically guesses that Pyrrhus was “a pier.”
Stephen indulges him and expands on Armstrong’s answer, calling
a pier “a disappointed bridge.” He imagines himself subserviently
dropping this witticism later for Haines’s amusement. Thinking of
Phyrrus’s and Caesar’s murders, Stephen wonders about the philosophical inevitability
of certain historical events—is history the fulfillment of the only
possible course of events, or one of many?
Stephen takes the class through Milton’s Lycidas as
he continues to ponder his own questions about history, questions
he thought about while reading Aristotle in a Paris library. An
image from Milton’s poem makes Stephen think of God’s effect on
all men. Stephen thinks of the lines of a common riddle then decides
to tell the students his own riddle as they gather their things
and prepare to leave to play field hockey. Stephen alone laughs
at his impenetrable riddle about a fox burying his grandmother under
a bush.
The students leave, except for Sargent, who needs help
with his arithmatic. Stephen looks at the ugly Sargent and imagines
Sargent’s mother’s love for him. Stephen shows Sargent the sums,
thinking briefly of Buck’s joke that Stephen’s Hamlet theory is
proven by algebra. Thinking again of amor matris, or
mother’s love, Stephen is reminded of himself as a child, clumsy
like Sargent. Sargent heads outside to join the hockey game. Stephen
walks outside, then goes to wait in Deasy’s office while Deasy,
the schoolmaster, settles a hockey dispute.
Mr. Deasy pays Stephen his wages and shows off his savings
box. Deasy lectures Stephen on the satisfaction of money earned
and the importance of keeping money carefully and of saving it.
Deasy remarks that an Englishman’s greatest pride is the ability
to claim he has paid his own way and owes nothing. Stephen mentally
tallies up his own abundant debts.
Deasy imagines that Stephen, whom he assumes is Fenian,
or an Irish Catholic nationalist, disrespects Deasy as a Tory—a
Protestant loyal to the English. Deasy argues his Irish credentials—he
has witnessed much Irish history. Deasy then asks Stephen to use
his influence to get a letter of Deasy’s printed in the newspaper.
While he finishes typing it, Stephen looks around his office at
the portraits of racehorses and remembers a trip to the racetrack
with his old friend Cranly.
Stephen hears shouts welcoming a goal scored on the hockey field.
Deasy hands Stephen his completed letter and Stephen skims it. The
letter warns of the dangers of foot-and-mouth cattle disease and
suggests that it can be cured. It seems that Deasy resents the influence
of those people who currently have power over the situation. He
also seems to blame Jews for similar corruption and destruction
of national economies. Stephen argues that greedy merchants can
be Jewish or gentile, but Deasy insists that the Jews have sinned
against “the light.”
Stephen remembers the Jewish merchants standing outside
the Paris stock exchange. Stephen again challenges Deasy, asking
who has not sinned against the light. Stephen rejects Deasy’s rendering
of the past, and states, “History is a nightmare from which I am
trying to awake.” Ironically, a goal is scored outside in the hockey
game as Deasy speaks of history as the movement toward the “goal”
of God’s manifestation. Stephen counters that God is no more than
“a shout in the street.” Deasy argues first that all have sinned,
then blames woman for bringing sin into the world. He lists women
of history who have caused destruction.
Deasy predicts that Stephen will not remain at the school
long, because he is not a born teacher. Stephen suggests that he
may be a learner rather than a teacher. Stephen signals the end
of the discussion by returning to the subject of Deasy’s letter.
Stephen will try to get it published in two newspapers. Stephen
walks out of the school, pondering his own subservience to Deasy.
Deasy runs after him to make one last jab against the Jews—Ireland
has never persecuted the Jews because they were never let in to
the country. Analysis
History is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake. Episode Two, “Nestor,” takes place at the boys school
where Stephen teaches. It is a half-day for the students and Stephen
will leave for the day after he teaches his class and is paid by
Mr. Deasy. The episode focuses on teaching and learning. We see
Stephen positioned first as a teacher and then as a student in his
conversation with Mr. Deasy. The subject of both educational scenes
is history, and history as linked to memory. Stephen’s history lesson
for his class relies on their memory of learned historical facts.
Mr. Deasy’s impromptu history lesson for Stephen is anchored by
Deasy’s own personal memories of historical events. Stephen himself
resists the linking of history with memory. For Deasy to define
history in terms of his personal recollections affords him too much
control over the reconstruction of it (thus do Haines and Deasy
use history to absolve themselves of responsibility). For Stephen,
history is something that he cannot control: “History is a nightmare
from which I am trying to awake.” Stephen’s statement refers both
to his grappling with the circumstances of his own past, and to
the philosophical problem of how history should be used to understand
present circumstances.
Part of Stephen’s personal history that has nightmarishly,
though subtly, plagued him through this episode and the first is
his mother’s death. Stephen’s unsolvable riddle about the fox burying
his grandmother suggests this personal pain. As he tutors Sargent,
Stephen’s ruminations about a mother’s love and love for one’s mother
also evoke her absence and stand in contrast to Deasy’s later misogyny. Stephen’s
imagination of a mother’s love creates a moment of compassion and
allows for an effective teaching between Stephen and Sargent. Otherwise,
Stephen’s interactions with his students have been distracted and
cryptic. Stephen himself credits Deasy with accuracy when Deasy
intuits later in the chapter that Stephen was not born to be a teacher.
On the whole, Deasy seems pompous and self-righteous.
We are prepared for the didactic nature of Deasy’s conversation
with Stephen by our first glimpse of Deasy on the hockey field,
yelling at the students without listening to them. Deasy is unperceptive—mistakenly
assuming that Stephen is Fenian, he launches into a history lecture.
The purpose of this lecture is less to teach than to assert authority,
an authority that is undermined by several factual errors that Deasy
makes. Like Haines, Deasy (a Unionist from the north) is pro-British
as well as anti-Semitic. Just as Haines used history to clear himself
of blame in Episode One (“It seems history is to blame”), so Deasy
uses history to blame others, notably Jews and women.
This prelude of anti-Semitism will be evoked later in
the day, as Jewish Leopold Bloom faces similar bigotry. Deasy’s
anti-Semitism rests on his sense that the mercantile Jews have brought
decay to England. According to Deasy, the Jews have sinned against
“the light,” the light being those Christians who understand history
as moving toward one goal—the manifestation of God’s plan. But the presentation
of Deasy’s character undermines his own convictions. Instead of
Christianity and light, Deasy himself deals in coins and material
goods. His moralistic color scheme, in which good Christians are
light and dangerous Jews are dark, is not to be the color scheme
of Ulysses, in which the two heroes, Stephen and
Bloom, are dressed in black, and the dangerous characters, such
as Buck Mulligan, are associated with brightness.
Notably, Stephen challenges only Deasy’s anti-Semitism
during the conversation, and not any other of Deasy’s ill-considered
comments. Stephen’s overall passivity and politeness toward Deasy seem
to have more to do with his unwillingness to participate in a political
argument on Deasy’s terms. Stephen’s bohemian-intellectual comment
that God is “a shout in the street” is a clear departure from the
terms of Deasy’s argument, and it confuses him. Deasy is aggressive
and likens their conversation to armed confrontation—breaking lances.
Stephen dislikes violence. The subject of his morning history lesson,
Pyrrhus, is notable for winning a battle, yet reckoning the cost
of the violence too great. During his conversation with Deasy, Stephen
is rattled by the noises from the hockey field outside. He envisions
the field hockey match as a joust and imagines the boys’ moving
bodies as sounds and gestures of bloody battle. Rather than remaining
in this atmosphere, prey to Deasy’s aggressive comments, Stephen
politely signals the end of the conversation by rustling the sheets
of Deasy’s letter. When Deasy runs after Stephen in the driveway
to report an anti-Semitic joke, Stephen’s non-participation is palpable.
His thoughts are silent; his mind has moved on. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||