Context
Plot Overview
Character List
Analysis of Major Characters
Themes, Motifs & Symbols
Part I, Chapter I
Part I, Chapters II–IV
Part I, Chapters V–VIII
Part I, Chapters IX–XI
Part II, Chapter I
Part II, Chapter II
Part II, Chapter III
Part II, Chapters IV–V
Part II, Chapter VI–VII
Part II, Chapter VIII
Part II, Chapter IX
Part II, Chapter X
Important Quotations Explained
Key Facts
Study Questions & Essay Topics
Quiz
Suggestions for Further Reading
|
Notes from Underground Fyodor Dostoevsky
Part I, Chapter I
Summary
The narratorreferred to in this SparkNote as the Underground Manintroduces
himself. He describes himself as sick, wicked, and unattractive,
and notes that he has a problem with his liver. He refuses to treat
this ailment out of spite, although he understands that keeping
his problems from doctors does the doctors themselves no harm.
The Underground Man explains that, during his many years
in civil service, he was wicked, but that he considers this wickedness
a kind of compensation for the fact that he never accepted bribes.
He almost immediately revises this claim, however, admitting that
he never achieved genuine wickedness toward his customers, but only managed
to be rude and intimidating as a kind of game.
We learn that the Underground Man has retired early from
his civil service job after inheriting a modest sum of money. He
only held onto his low-ranking job so that he would be able to afford food,
not because he got any satisfaction from it. He notes that he is filled
with conflicting impulses: wickedness, sentimentality, self-loathing,
contempt for others. His intense consciousness of these opposing
elements has paralyzed him. He has settled into his miserable corner
of the world, incapable of wickedness and incapable of action, loathing
himself even as he congratulates himself on his own intelligence
and sensitivity. He adds that the weather in St. Petersburg is probably
bad for his health, but that he will stay there anyway, out of spite.
In a note to Chapter I included in some editions as an
introduction to the novel, Dostoevsky explains his intention in
writing Notes from Underground. He tells us that
the author of the work is fictional, but notes that the nature of
society makes it inevitable that people like this fictional narrator
exist. As to the structure of the novel, Dostoevsky explains that
in the first fragment, entitled Underground, the Underground
Man introduces himself and explains why he appeared and had to
appear among us. The second half, entitled Apropos of the Wet
Snow, consists of the Underground Man's accounts of actual events
in his life.
Analysis
The first chapter of Notes from Underground gives
us a precise sketch of the Underground Man's character. By the end
of the first paragraph, we get a sense of the issues that preoccupy
the Underground Man. Contradictions and indecision are fundamental
to his character. He says that his liver hurts, but then immediately
tells us that he is not sure it is his liver. He knows he is sick,
but he refuses to see a doctor out of spite, even though he knows
that in pursuing this spiteful behavior he is only in hurting himself.
He develops this idea of indecisive action later in the chapter,
when he talks about the conflicts swarming inside him.
This inability to act stems from several important factors.
First, the Underground Man is a nihilist, which means that he believes that
traditional social values have no foundation in nature, and that human
existence is essentially useless. The Underground Man despises the
society in which he lives. Not only is the weather bad in St. Petersburg,
but the culture of the city is built on bureaucracy and hypocrisy.
Accepting bribes is common and widely tolerated. The Underground
Man is filled with bitterness toward all aspects of society, but
he is aware that he is powerless to act against it or within it. He
cannot even manage to be a wicked civil servant. Instead, he takes
his aggressions out on himself, refusing to see a doctor and remaining
in an unhealthy climate out of spite. This behavior is the first
evidence we have of the Underground Man's masochism, his enjoyment
of his own pain and humiliation. The Underground Man explores this
idea in more depth later in the novel.
Another important factor that contributes to the Underground Man's
indecision is his intense self-consciousness. Though the Underground
Man is frequently irrational, he is also extremely analytical and
acutely conscious of every thought, urge, and feeling that crosses
his mind. It is this heightened consciousness that makes him aware
of all of the opposite elements inside him, so much so that he
can never make a decision or act confidently on any of his desires.
The Underground Man is also highly conscious of what others think
of him. He is intensely aware of our presence as readers. He addresses
us frequently and directly, calling us gentlemen, and he constantly
analyzes and revises his statements in the fear that we are judging
him. Indeed, the Underground Man treats us like a panel of hostile
judges, looking down upon his underground life from our comfortable
position above ground, from the vantage point of the social world
he has fled.
Because we are aware that the Underground Man is conscious
of our presence, we must question the validity of any statements
he makes about not writing for our benefit. The Underground Man
is a prime example of what is known in literature as an unreliable
narrator: because everything we learn from the Underground Man is
filtered though the lens of his own nihilistic, anguished perspective,
we can never be sure he is telling us the objective truth about
anything. We must use what we learn about the Underground Man's
psychological state to fully understand his motives for telling
us something, and to get a clear picture of the facts of his interactions
with people.
Dostoevsky's note highlights the fact that the Underground
Man is an unreliable narrator. By telling us that the Underground
Man is fictional, and by describing the social conditions that might
have produced someone like the Underground Man, Dostoevsky distances
himself from his narrator. Because Notes from Underground is
written in first person, it is easy to imagine that Dostoevsky and the
Underground Man share the same perspective. However, one of the
hallmarks of all of Dostoevsky's works is his ability to create
distance between himself and his characters. One of the techniques
he uses to accomplish this distance is humor. Indeed, in this novel,
the Underground Man's behavior is so absurd that it often verges
on the comic. Though Dostoevsky may share many of the Underground Man's
opinions about society, he prefers to put those opinions in the mouth
of someone rather unappealing and unconvincing. Dostoevsky feared
that if he made his arguments too well, his readers would accept
them without weighing their good and bad points.
The fact that the Underground Man is a civil servant is
another important element. Many of Dostoevsky's most famous characters are
low-ranking civil servants who are lost in the society of nineteenth
century St. Petersburg. The Underground Man is just an average man,
neither a philosopher nor a professional writer. As such, he does
not use any philosophical terms when discussing his ideas. Although
in his youth he was a great admirer of the literary, by the time
he is writing these notes, he has generally abandoned literary language,
except in cases when he uses it ironically. Instead, the Underground
Man uses everyday language with a kind of deliberate awkwardness.
  Help |
Feedback |
Make a request |
Report an error |
Send to a friend
|
|