|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book IV
Returning to Thagaste from his studies at Carthage, Augustine began to
teach rhetoric, making friends and chasing a career along the way. Though
giving some account of these worldly matters, Augustine spends much of Book IV
examining his conflicted state of mind during this period. Having begun his
turn toward God (through the desire for truth) but continuing to be ensnared in
sinful ways, Augustine wrestled painfully with the transitory nature of the
material world and with the question of God's nature in relation to such a
world.
[IV.1-7] Augustine opens this Book with a short description of his
pursuits in Thagaste, which he says consisted primarily of "being seduced and
seducing, being deceived and deceiving." He points out that he spent his public
hours in pursuit of empty, worldly goals (his ambition to attain public office,
which required great skill in oratory as well as contacts and money) and his
private hours pursuing a "false religion" (Manicheism). This hypocritical
life, in which he sought both material gain and (false) spiritual purity,
was nothing but a form of "self-destruction."
Chief among Augustine's regrets about this period are his career as a
"salesman" of the "tricks of rhetoric" (he was an instructor in rhetoric, partly
to students at the law courts) and his persistence in keeping a concubine.
Although he doesn't say much about this unnamed woman, she stayed with Augustine
for nearly ten years, eventually bearing him a son (Adeodatus, who would die
at age seventeen).
Augustine does recall, however, making some progress toward truth. In part
through the influence of his close friend Nebridius, Augustine concluded
that astrology is "utterly bogus." (This will prove an important first step in
discarding the colorful Manichee mythology, which contains a number of
bizarre accounts of the heavenly bodies). Shunning this dubious form of
prediction and the elaborate sacrificial rituals that often accompanied it,
Augustine began to attribute its occasional success almost entirely to chance,
which he sees as "a power everywhere diffused in the nature of things."
[IV.8-18] Such considerations were interrupted for a while when a close
friend of Augustine suddenly passed away, leaving him grief-stricken:
"everything on which I set my gaze was death." Realizing now that his grief
would have been alleviated by faith in God, Augustine concludes that his grief
meant he had "become to myself a vast problem." Attached to the transient,
embodied things of the world (rather than to God), he suffered grief when they
disappeared.
This theme gets a lengthy treatment here, as Augustine investigates the
unreliability and transience of things and the permanence of God. Misery, he
writes, is due to an unreasonable attachment to "mortal things." Further, this
is always the state of the soul without God--misery is everywhere
when there is nothing eternal to depend on. "Where," Augustine asks, "should I
go to escape from myself?... Wherever the human soul turns itself, other than
you, it is fixed in sorrows."
With everything around him looking like death, Augustine again left Thagaste
for Carthage. His state of mind at this point was not good, but the lessons
he learned from his grief are still with him. The chief lesson, again, is
transience. Every material thing, no matter how beautiful, is demarcated by a
beginning and an end--no sooner does anything come to be than it is "rush[ing]
toward non-being." These things, then, should only be the object of love in as
much as one is loving the presence of God in them.
God, on the other hand, is "a place of undisturbed quietness." Though the
things of the world pass away, taken together they are part of a timeless whole.
Through God, one can perceive this whole, since God is the ground for all
existence. If this is recognized, temporality shouldn't be a concern.
There are a few references here to speech and language in the context of
transience. Speech for Augustine is problematic in two deeply intertwined ways.
Firstly, it is always successive--one cannot say anything all at once. Thus,
speech (and writing, for that matter) is always bound in temporality, that state
which is unknown to God but suffered by his estranged creation. In addition,
speech is incapable of accurately describing God (a concern of the first pages
of the Confessions). In both form and content, then, language is a poor
tool with which to pursue the truth of God. There is an exception, however:
prayer or confessions, forms of direct address to God's mercy. (The Latin
for this word carries the double meaning of admitting guilt to God and
praising God.) God is always listening, and direct address to him is the format
for the Confessions as a whole.
[IV.19-27] Augustine devotes some time to a reappraisal of a book he
wrote during this period in Carthage, called The Beautiful and the
Fitting. The book argued that there were two kinds of beauty: beauty
inherent in the thing itself and beauty by virtue of the thing's use value.
There are a number of retractions Augustine wants to make concerning this
work, most of which he now considers "miserable folly." First to go is the
dedication, which was made to Hierius, a Roman orator well known at the time.
Augustine recognizes that he dedicated his work to this man solely because
Hierius was popular: "I used to love people on the basis of human judgement,
not your judgement, my God."
In The Beautiful and the Fitting, Augustine also argued that there is
an evil substance that causes division and conflict, whereas the nature of
the good is the unity and peace whose most perfect instantiation is in pure
mind. Two things are wrong with this view, and both are Manichee
errors. First, there is the idea of evil as a substance--an impossibility if
God is to be omnipotent and omnipresent. Second, there is the idea of the mind
as "the supreme and unchangeable good."
Augustine considers his second error in particular to be "amazing madness."
The soul, he now knows, is not itself the fundamental truth or good. It
participates in God, but is not itself God or some small piece of God. The
error about evil and this error about the soul together constitute, in
Augustine's eyes, a massive arrogance characteristic of Manichee beliefs: evil
is thought to exist due to God's impotence (rather than human impotence),
and humans mistake themselves for God.
With this retraction made, Augustine moves from what he was writing at the
time to what he was reading: Aristotle's Categories. Like the
Neoplatonists, Augustine now understands Aristotle's work as a system
applicable only to this world (and to logical exercises in general), but not to
God. At the time, however, he was puzzled and misled. Trying to conceive how
God could have beauty and magnitude as attributes (following Aristotle's
system), he failed to realize that "you [God] yourself are your own magnitude
and your own beauty."
This error led Augustine further into the false problems of trying to
imagine God. With the influence of Manichee beliefs all around him, he pictured
God as "like a luminous body of immense size and myself a bit of that body.
What extraordinary perversity!"
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||