Themes, Arguments, and Ideas
The Limitations of Principles
Because of his Humanist studies of classical philosophy,
More had an ideal vision of morality that contrasted with the realities
of his world, and one of the major goals of the Humanist movement
was to integrate those ideals into real life. However, More knew
that principles alone don't get anyone very far in politics. More's
father was a notable judge and raised him amid politics and politicians,
so he had seen how corrupt political life could be. A major theme
of an early work, The History of King Richard III,
was the deception and ruthlessness of rulers. The bloody War of
the Roses, a vicious power struggle over the English throne that
had thrown the country into chaos for much of the previous century,
remained potent in English memory. In book I of Utopia,
More accuses Hythloday of being too “academic” in his attitude toward
advising rulers. More seems to be saying that one cannot simply
represent ideal principles and then despair that corrupt leaders
will never heed them. Instead, to gain influence, a conscientious
political advisor must learn to play the game and to accept the
realities of a world dominated by power and greed.
The Importance of Social Critique
In Utopia, More contends that thorough
scrutiny of institutions is valuable and that conceiving of ideal
or imaginary alternatives to reality may yield important insights
into how institutions can improve. While some scholars have been
tempted to read More's Utopia as a set of recommendations
for the conduct of real-world affairs, an outright critique of contemporary
rulers and laws would not have been possible for More, who was a
respected statesmen and close advisor to Henry VIII. The narrator
More criticizes the fantastical accounts of the Utopians, effectively
distancing the author More from Hythloday's provocative recommendations, which
include the abolition of private property. However, the extent to
which the author More favors Utopian practices is unclear. In Utopia, More
contrasts the problems of the real world, such as poverty, crime,
and political corruption, with the harmony, equality, and prosperity
of Utopian society, which suggests that More believes that at least
some of the principles underlying Utopian practices are noble, even
if the practices themselves are far fetched. In any case, in describing
and critiquing Utopian society, More gives new perspectives on the
problems and strengths of his own society.
