|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Act II, scenes i–iii
Summary: Act II, scene i
At an inn yard in Rochester, beside the main highway about
twenty-five miles outside of London, two carriers—middlemen who
deliver goods from one merchant to another—are readying their horses
to depart in the early-morning darkness. The stableboy is slow in
coming out to help, and the carriers are annoyed. Gadshill, the
highwayman friend of Falstaff and Harry, appears out of the darkness
and asks the carriers if he may borrow a lantern. They are suspicious
of Gadshill, however, and refuse.
As soon as the carriers have gone on their way, a chamberlain
of the inn comes out to talk to Gadshill; he is Gadshill’s informer.
He tells him that some very wealthy travelers are currently having
their breakfast in the inn and will be on the road soon. Gadshill
offers him a cut of the profits, which the chamberlain refuses.
Gadshill then calls for his horse and rides off to set his ambush. Summary: Act II, scene ii
Waiting a few miles further along the highway, at Gad’s
Hill, -Falstaff searches for his horse—Poins has secretly taken
it from where it was tied and concealed it in the woods. Peto, Bardolph,
and Harry, who is in on the joke, stand by. The fat Falstaff is
very uncomfortable on foot and, puffing and panting, complains loudly. Harry
soothes Falstaff by telling him he will look for his horse (which,
of course, he does not intend to do).
Gadshill shows up to complete the party with the news
that the wealthy travelers are approaching. Harry suggests that
Falstaff, Peto, Bardolph, and Gadshill confront the travelers on
the highway; Harry and Poins will then flank them on either side
of the road to catch any who try to escape. The men put on their
masks, and Poins and Harry disappear into hiding. The travelers
appear, and Falstaff, Peto, Bardolph, and Gadshill rob them and
tie them up. Summary: Act II, scene iii
As the four split up the gold, Poins and Harry, in their
buckram disguises and new masks, charge the thieves and demand their
money. The four flee in terror without putting up a fight—only Falstaff
even tries to get in a blow or two. Laden with gold and mightily
entertained, Poins and Harry go to their horses, laughing to think
of how angry Falstaff will be when he finds out that they have gotten
rid of his horse and that he will have to walk back to London. Analysis: Act II, scenes i–iii
1 Henry IV covers
a wide range of terrain, both in terms of the literal geography
of England and in terms of the classes of people in the play. Shakespeare
interweaves high scenes, which feature noblemen engaging
in debates about the nature of kingship or the strategies of war,
with low scenes of commoners and criminals engaged
in various petty plots. This combination was something fairly new
for Shakespeare and for English drama as a whole, causing critics
and readers alike to compare the play to Geoffrey Chaucer’s great
Middle English work, The Canterbury Tales, written
at the end of the fourteenth century.
Scenes i through iii of Act II offer good examples of
this contrast. Here Shakespeare moves beyond his frequently used
locale of the Boar’s Head Tavern to conjure up the front yards of
cheap roadside inns and the highway ambushes of dangerous—if bungling
and cowardly—robbers. The robbery scene, with its lawlessness and violence,
offers a low parallel to the high rebellion
of the Percys later in the play and thus acts as both a mirror and
a subtle instance of foreshadowing, hinting at the rapid disintegration
of stability and peace in England.
The carriers’ conversation (which, although lively, is
almost unintelligible to contemporary readers without annotations)
is an example of the sort of lower-class voice not usually found
in the history plays of Shakespeare’s contemporaries. It also provides
an example of the wide range of different dialects and modes of
speech that Shakespeare presents throughout the play. These range
from the noble language of the royal characters and the wittiness
of -Falstaff to the foreign accents of Glyndwr
and the Douglas and the uneducated but lively voices of the robbers
and the tavern hostess. The sheer diversity of speech in 1 Henry
IV suggests a preoccupation with the richness and multiplicity
of the English language as it is manifested in various social and
cultural forms.
The practical joke that Poins and Harry play on Falstaff, -Bardolph,
Peto, and Gadshill, while amusing, further complicates the friendship
between Harry and Falstaff. Harry seems to have no problem insulting
Falstaff far more viciously than Falstaff ever insults him. Similarly,
he doesn’t mind causing Falstaff discomfort, as when he and Poins
steal his horse and force him to walk back to London. As Falstaff
himself puts it, “Eight yards of uneven ground is threescore and
ten [i.e., seventy] miles afoot with me, and the stony-hearted villains
know it well enough” (II.ii.23–26). The ultimate
point of the joke, moreover, is to humiliate Falstaff by catching him
in the lie that Harry and Poins know he will tell about the affair. Harry’s
attitude toward his friend and mentor is uneven: he often treats
Falstaff affectionately, but he can also be sadistic. This ambivalence
becomes increasingly important during this play and its sequel, 2 Henry
IV.
The joke also raises questions about whether Harry can
regain the all-important honor that he has lost by behaving badly—the same
honor that Hotspur currently holds in the eyes of the populace and
the king. This quest for honor becomes the central point of contention
between Harry and his rival; as Shakespeare likes to make mirrors
of important scenes and ideas, reflecting among the lowlifes what
occurs among the nobility, a concern for honor shows up among the
play’s lowlifes as well. Poins and Harry’s betrayal of the other
highwaymen supports the old saying that there is no honor among
thieves, an idea that Falstaff touches on when he says, “A plague
upon’t when thieves cannot be true one to another!” (II.ii.25–26).
Ironically, it is Harry—the crown prince himself—who is among the
worst of the crew, not only participating in a robbery but also
stabbing his friends in the back. This betrayal is done as a joke,
but it is strangely at odds with Harry’s alleged goal of becoming
the most honorable character of all, one worthy of being a king.
The questions raised here eventually culminate in the full-scale
assault that Shakespeare (in the voice of Falstaff) launches, in Act
V, scene i, on the ideal of honor, which Harry and the other noblemen
claim to follow. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | About
©2006 SparkNotes LLC, All Rights Reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||